Effect of Testing Factors on Rietveld Quantitative Analysis of Cement-Matrix Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

For cement-matrix materials, the microstructure plays a vital important role in the research. Recently, quantitative phase analysis of cementitious materials can be performed using the Rietveld method by fitting the calculated X-ray diffraction (XRD) profile with the observed one. The aim of this paper is to further perform the quantitative analysis by the Rietveld method and discuss the influence of testing factors on the Rietveld quantitative phase analysis. The factors included the collection range of pattern, step size and the scan time of per step. In this study, the chemical composition of the samples was determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry. And their phase composition was calculated by X-ray powder diffraction and Rietveld analysis. The results showed that the collection range of pattern depended on the tested materials , and the scanning range should include the main diffraction peak of the sample. Smaller step size and longer scan time of each step made the fitting factor smaller, also the calculated pattern coincided with the measured pattern, better enhance the precision of the analyses.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2054-2059

Citation:

Online since:

June 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K.L. Scrivener, T. Fu llmann, E. Gallucci, G. Walent, E. Bermejo. Quantitative study of Portland cement hydration by X-ray diffraction /Rietveld analysis and independent methods, Cem. Concr. Res. 34 (2004) 1541-1547.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.014

Google Scholar

[2] R.H. Bogue. Calculation of the compounds in Portland cement, Ind. Eng. Chem. 1 (1929) 192–197.

Google Scholar

[3] H.F.W. Taylor. Modification of the Bogue calculation, Adv. Cem. Res. 2 (1989) 73–77.

Google Scholar

[4] D. Sorrentino, F. Sorrentino, E. Gartner. Prediction of a Portland cement's properties from its chemical and mineralogical composition, in: F. Young, J. Skalny (Eds. ), Materials Science of Concrete VII, The American Ceramic Society, (2005)1–35.

Google Scholar

[5] Piqi Zhao, Xianping Liu, Ángeles G. De la Torre, Peiming Wang. Rietveld quantitative analysis of Portland cement by internal standard and Gfactor methods, Proceedings of the 14th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, (2010).

Google Scholar

[6] P. Stutzman, S. Leigh. Phase analysis of hydraulic cements by X-ray powder diffraction: precision, bias, and qualification, J. ASTM Int. 4 (2007) 1–11.

DOI: 10.1520/jai101085

Google Scholar

[7] L. León-Reina, A.G. de la Torre, J.M. Porras-Vásquez. Round robin on Rietveld quantitative phase analysis of Portland cements, J. Appl. Cryst. 42 (2009) 1–11.

DOI: 10.1107/s0021889809028374

Google Scholar

[8] Jin yong, Sun xiaosong, Xue qi. X-ray Diffraction Analysis Technology. Defense industry press, beijing, (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] Gwenn Le Saoût, Vanessa Kocab, Karen Scrivener. Application of the Rietveld method to the analysis of anhydrous cement, Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (2011) 133–148.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.10.003

Google Scholar

[10] L. P. Aldridge. Accuracy and precision of phase analysis in portland cement by bogue,microscopic and X-ray diffraction methods. Cement and Concrete Research, 12(1983): 381.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(82)90087-4

Google Scholar