Multi-Phase Microstructures for Materials with Extreme Bulk Modulus or Thermal Conductivity

Abstract:

This paper describes a methodology based on “Bidirectional Evolutionary Structural Optimization” (BESO) for topological design of microstructures of materials with more than two constituent phases. The composite material is made by repeating microstructures known as periodic base cells. The aim is to achieve appropriate topology of microstructure phases that enhances the material’s bulk or thermal conductivity performance in macro-scale. Constituent phases are divided into some groups and by performing finite element analyses on microstructure, sensitivity numbers are calculated with the application of Homogenization theory. Properties of elements are gradually changed in the finite element model based on their sensitivity numbers and controlling volume of each constituent phase in the model. Some sample microstructures are generated and presented to show the capability of the approach. The results indicate that the proposed approach is very cost efficient. Moreover, there are distinctive boundaries between the constituent phases in the generated microstructures; which is an inherent advantage of application of BESO approach.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 909)
• Pages: 306-310
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.909.306
• Online since: November 2017
• Authors: Arash Radman*, Xiao Dong Huang, Yi Min Xie
• Keywords: Bulk Modulus, Homogenization Theory, Periodic Composites, Thermal Conductivity, Topology Optimization

References

[1] J. Yang, H. Ouyang and Y. Wang: The Int. J. of Adv. Manu. Tech Vol. 46 (9-12), pp.1133-1143.

[2] S. Zhou, Q. Li: J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys Vol. 40 (2007): 6083-6093.

[3] X. Huang, Y. Xie, B. Jia, Q. Li and S. Zhou: Struct. and Multidiscip Opt. (2012): pp.1-14.

[4] B. Hassani, E. Hinton: Comput. and Struct Vol. 69(1998). pp. (707-717) (719-738) (739-756).

[5] M. P. Kamat: Structural optimization: status and promise (American Instiitute of Aeronautics and Astronautics , Inc., USA 1993).

[6] G.I.N. Rozvany: Structural Design via Optimality Criteria (Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands 1989).

[7] M.P. Bendsøe, N. Kikuchi: Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng Vol. 71 (2) (1988), pp.197-224.

[8] O. Sigmund, and J. Petersson: Struct. and Multidiscip Opt Vol. 16(1)(1998): pp.68-75.

[9] K. Schittkowski, C. Zillober and R. Zotemantel: Struct. and Multidisc. Opt Vol. 7(1)(1994), pp.1-19.

[10] S. Zhou and M. Wang: Struct. Multidiscip. Opt Vol. 33 (2) (2007), p.89–111.

[11] J.K. Guest, J.H. Prévost and T. Belytschko: Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng Vol. 61 (2) (2004), p.238–254.

[12] M.Y. Wang, S. Zhou and H. Ding: Struct. Multidiscip. Opt Vol. 28 (4) (2004), p.262–276.

[13] X. Huang and Y.M. Xie: Evolutionary Topology Optimization of Continuum Structures: Methods and Applications (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2010).

[14] X. Huang and Y.M. Xie: Comput. Mech Vol. 43 (3) (2009), p.393–401.

[15] E.J. Haug, K.K. Choi and V. Komkov: Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems (Academic Press, Orlando, 1986).

[16] Z. Hashin, S. Shtrikman: J. Mech. Phys. Solids Vol. 11(2) (1963), p.127–140.