Manufacturing of Long-Length Rods of Ultrafine-Grained Ti-Ni Shape Memory Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ti-Ni shape memory alloys were subjected to a rotary forging (RF) from the diameter of 20 or 12 mm to 5 mm at relatively low temperatures of 450 and 350 °C. The structure was studied using X-ray diffraction analysis and transmission electron microscopy. Mechanical properties were determined by uniaxial tensile and Vickers hardness tests, and the maximum completely recoverable strain by a thermomechanical method. The obtained results showed that RF at low temperatures allows manufacturing 3 m-long Ti-Ni rods. A mixed submicrocrystalline and nanosubgrained structure with an average size of structural elements of 118 ± 7 nm after forging from 20 mm, and 126 ± 7 nm after forging from 12 mm at 350 °С provides the highest mechanical (σв = 1113 MPa after forging from 20 mm, and 1065 MPa after forging from 12 mm) and functional (maximum completely recoverable strain of 8.0 %, after post-deformation annealing at 400 °С, 1 h) properties as compared to the initial state before RF (700 MPa, and 4.4 %, respectively).

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T.W. Duerig, K.N. Melton, D. Stöckel, and C.M. Wayman, Eds., Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys, Butterworth-Heineman, London, (1990).

Google Scholar

[2] K. Otsuka, C.M. Wayman, Eds., Shape Memory Materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1998).

Google Scholar

[3] N. Resnina, V. Rubanik, Eds., Shape Memory Alloys: Properties, Technologies, Opportunities, Trans. Tech. Publications, Praffikon, (2015).

Google Scholar

[4] J. M. Jani, M. Leary, A. Subic, and M. A. Gibson, Mater. Des. 56 (2014) 1078-1113.

Google Scholar

[5] I.Y. Khmelevskaya, R.D. Karelin, S.D. Prokoshkin, V.A. Andreev, V.S. Yusupov, M.M. Perkas, V.V. Prosvirnin, A.N. Shelest, V.S. Komarov, Phys. Met. Metallogr. 118 (2017) 279–287.

DOI: 10.1134/s0031918x17030073

Google Scholar

[6] I.Y. Khmelevskaya, R. Kawalla, S.D. Prokoshkin, and V.S. Komarov, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 63 (2014) 012108.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/63/1/012108

Google Scholar

[7] I. Khmelevskaya, V. Komarov, R. Kawalla, S. Prokoshkin, G. Korpala, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 26 (2017) 4011.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-017-2841-1

Google Scholar

[8] A. Lotkov, V. Grishkov, O. Kashin, A. Baturin, D. Zhapova, and V. Timkin, Mater. Sci. Found. 81–82 (2015) 245–259.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msfo.81-82.245

Google Scholar

[9] A.K. Srivastava, D. Schryvers, J. Van Humbeeck, Intermetallics 15 (2007) 1538–1547.

Google Scholar

[10] V. Brailovski, S. Prokoshkin, K. Inaekyan, and V. Demers, J. Alloys Compd. 509 (2011) 2066–(2075).

Google Scholar

[11] K.A. Polyakova-Vachiyan, E.P. Ryklina, S.D. Prokoshkin, and S.M. Dubinskii, Phys. Met. Metallogr. 117 (2016) 817–827.

DOI: 10.1134/s0031918x16080123

Google Scholar