Properties of Low Water/Cement Ratio and High Compressive Strength Pervious Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to discuss the properties of low water/cement ratio and high compressive strength pervious concrete. Two sizes of air-cooling electric arc furnace slag (EAFS), for the same size of 0.24 - 0.48 cm and 0.48 - 0.96 cm, were prepared as the coarse aggregates. Two water-to-cement ratios and three filled percentages (70, 80, and 90%) of voids by cement pastes were selected as variables. The unit weight, connected porosity, water permeability coefficient, compressive strength, and flexural strength of pervious concrete were conducted. Test results show that the pervious concrete with higher filled percentage of voids by cement paste has higher unit weight, compressive strength, and flexural strength and smaller connected porosity and water permeability coefficient. The lower the water/cement ratio and EAFS size, the superior the properties. At the water/cement ratio of 0.25, pervious concrete with EAFS size of 0.24 – 0.48 cm and 90% filled percentage of voids by cement pastes had the highest compressive strength of 35 MPa and flexural strength of 7 MPa.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

136-140

Citation:

Online since:

September 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P.W. Barnhouse and W.V. SrubarIII: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 110 ( 2016), pp.89-97.

Google Scholar

[2] L. Haselbach: in Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] J.J. Chang, W. Yeih, T.J. Chung, and R. Huang: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol.109 (2016),pp.34-40.

Google Scholar

[4] O. Deo and N. Neithalath: Mater. Sci. Engin. A Vol. 528(2010), pp.402-412.

Google Scholar

[5] B. Huang, H. Wu, X. Shu, and E. G.Burdette: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 24 (2010), pp.818-823.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Yang and G. Jiang: Cem. Concr. Res. Vol. 33 (2003), pp.381-386.

Google Scholar

[7] T.C. Fu,R. Huang, W. Yeih, J.J. Chang, P.C. Lee: Adv. Mater. Res. Vol. 1089 (2015),pp.253-264.

Google Scholar

[8] L. Crouch, J. Pitt, and R. Hewitt: J Mater. Civil Engin. Vol. 19 (2007), pp.561-568.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Joshaghani, A.A. Ramezanianpour, and A.G. Omid Ataei: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 101 ( 2015), pp.317-325.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Ibrahim, E. Mahmoud, M. Yamin, and V.C. Patibandla: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol.50 (2014), pp.524-529.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Yahia and K.D. Kabagire: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 62 (2014), pp.38-46.

Google Scholar

[12] C. Gaedicke, A. Marines, and F. Miankodila: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 68 (2014), pp.701-708.

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM C 150. Standard Specification for Portland Cement. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2017).

Google Scholar

[14] ASTM C138. Standard Test Method for Density (Unit Weight), Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete. (2016).

DOI: 10.1520/c0138_c0138m-13

Google Scholar

[15] J.J. Chang, W. Yeih, T.J. Chung, and R. Huang: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol.109 (2016), pp.34-40.

Google Scholar

[16] ASTM C 39. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2016).

Google Scholar

[17] ASTM D790. Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. (2015).

DOI: 10.1520/d0790-07

Google Scholar