X-Ray Diffraction Evaluation of the Average Number of Layers in Thermal Reduced Graphene Powder for Supercapacitor Nanomaterial

Article Preview

Abstract:

Graphene oxide (GO) can be partially reduced to graphene-like sheets by removing the oxygen-containing groups and recovering the conjugated structure. In this work, the thermal reduction of GO powder has been carried out using back pumping vacuum pressures and investigated employing X-ray diffraction analysis. The experimental results of estimating the number of graphene layers on the reduced powder at various temperatures (200 – 1000 °C) have been reported. Electrical changes have been produced in a graphene oxide with the vacuum reduction process. This study has shown that the ideal processing temperature for reducing graphene oxide nanomaterial was about 400 °C. It has also been shown that at 600 °C the number of layers in the reduced nanomaterial increased. The internal series equivalent resistance (ESR) has been improved substantially with the vacuum thermal treatment even at temperatures above 400 °C. ESR was reduced from 95.0 to about 13.8 Ω cm2 with this processing. These results showed that the process can be applied to the reduction of graphene oxide to produce supercapacitor nanomaterials. The advantage of employing this method is that the processing is a straightforward and low cost thermal treatment that might be used for large amount of nanocomposite material.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

117-122

Citation:

Online since:

June 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Pei, H. Cheng, Carbon 50 (9) (2012) pp.3210-3228.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Qiu, F. Guo, R. Hurt, I. Kulaots, Carbon 72 (2014) pp.215-223.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Liu: PhD Thesis (2014). Modified thermal reduction of graphene oxide. University of Nottingham.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Yang, S. Gunasekaran: Carbon Vol. 51 (2013), p.36.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Kumar, K. S. Subrahmanyam, C.N.R. Rao: International Journal of Nanoscience Vol. 4 (4-5) (2011), p.559.

Google Scholar

[6] W.S. Hummers, R.E. Offeman: J. Am. Chem. Soc. Vol. 80 (1958), p.1339.

Google Scholar

[7] S.H. Huh: Thermal Reduction of Graphene Oxide, Physics and Applications of graphene – Experiments, Dr.Sergey Mikhailov (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-217-3, InTech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/physics-and-applications-of-graphene-experiments/thermal-reduction-of-graphene-oxide.

DOI: 10.5772/14156

Google Scholar

[8] N. Iwashita, C.R. Park, H. Fujimoto, M. Shiraishi, M. Inagaki: Carbon Vol. 42 (2004), p.701.

Google Scholar

[9] L. Stobinski, B.Lesiak, A. Malalepszy, M. Mazurkiewicz, B. Mierzwa, J. Zemek, P. Jiricek, I. Bieloshapka: J. Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena Vol. 195 (2014), p.145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.elspec.2014.07.003

Google Scholar

[10] H.M. Ju, S.H. Choi, S.H. Huh: Journal of the Korean Physical Society Vol. 57 (6) (2010), p.1649.

Google Scholar

[11] X. Li, G. Zhang, X. Bai, X. Sun, X. Wang, E. Wang, H. Dai: Nature Nanotechnology Vol. 3 (9) (2008), p.538.

Google Scholar

[12] Q. Su, S. Pang, V. Alijani, C. Li, X. Feng, K. Müllen: Advanced Materials Vol. 21 (31) (2009), p.3191.

Google Scholar

[13] D.A. Dikin, S. Stankovich, E.J. Zimney, R.D. Piner, G.H. Dommett, G. Evmenenko, R.S. Ruoff: Nature Vol. 448 (7152) (2007), p.457.

DOI: 10.1038/nature06016

Google Scholar

[14] F. Li, X. Jiang, J. Zhao, S. Zhang: Energy Vol. 16 (2015), p.488.

Google Scholar