Mechanical Properties of Graphene Nanoplatelets-Reinforced Epoxy Grout in Repairing Damaged Pipelines

Article Preview

Abstract:

The use of Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites together with infill grout has been proven effective for repairing damaged steel pipelines. This paper study the mechanical properties of epoxy grouts where an amount of 0.2% and 0.8% of graphene nanoplatelets particles were added to commercial epoxy resin to evaluate their behaviour regarding neat epoxy resin. Compressive tests, tensile tests and flexural tests were conducted to study the effect of graphene nanoplatelets towards neat epoxy resin. By comparing graphene-modified grouts and neat epoxy grout, there is no increment of strength under compression and tensile test due to poor dispersion of graphene nanoplatelets. Nevertheless, the addition of graphene has produced a noticeable improvement in flexural properties. This signifies that with the inclusion of graphene nanoplatelets, the properties of epoxy grout can be improved if a better dispersion can be achieved.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

242-248

Citation:

Online since:

July 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Bruce, W. A., and Keifner, J. (2015). Pipeline Repair Using Full-Encirclement Repair Sleeves. In Winston Reive, R. (Ed.). Oil and Gas Pipelines: Integrity and Safety Handbook. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp.635-654.

DOI: 10.1002/9781119019213.ch44

Google Scholar

[2] Salim, U.S., Valipour, A., Azraai, S.N.A., Lim, K.S., Zardasti, L., Noor, M.N., and Yahaya, N. (2016). Compressive, flexural and tensile properties of graphene modified grouts for pipeline rehabilitation, Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28-Special Issue (2), 102-111.

Google Scholar

[3] Li, Y., Li, T. X., Cai, G. W., Yang, L. H. (2013). Influence of AC interference to corrosion of Q235 carbon steel. Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, 48(5), 322-326.

DOI: 10.1179/1743278212y.0000000076

Google Scholar

[4] Othman, S.R., Yahaya, N., Noor, M.N., Lim, K.S., Zardasti, L., and Rashid, A.S.A. (2017). Modelling of external metal loss for corroded buried pipeline. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 139(3), 031702.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4035463

Google Scholar

[5] Tahir, S.N.F.M.M., Noor, M.N., and Yahaya, N., and Lim, K.S. (2015). Relationship between in-situ measurement of soil parameters and metal loss volume of x70 carbon steel coupon. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 8(2), 205-211.

DOI: 10.3923/ajsr.2015.205.211

Google Scholar

[6] Haladuick, S., and Dann, M.R. (2018). Decision making for long-term pipeline system repair or replacement. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering System, Part A: Civil Engineering, 4(2), 04018009.

DOI: 10.1061/ajrua6.0000956

Google Scholar

[7] Bernardo, G., Laterza, M., D'Amato, M., Andrisani., G., Diaz, A., and Laguna, E. (2016). ELARCH Project: the use of innovative product based on the nanotechnologies for the protection of architectural heritage. Proceeding of the XII Congresso International Sobre Patologia e Reabilitacao de Estruturas, 26th – 29th October 2016, Portugal.

Google Scholar

[8] Tahir, S.N.F.M.M., Yahaya, N., Noor, M.N., Lim, K.S., and Rahman, A.A. (2015). Underground corrosion model of steel pipelines using in-situ parameters of soil. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 137(5), 051701.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4028424

Google Scholar

[9] Pereira, J. C. R., de Jesus, A. M. P., Fernandes, A. A., and Varelis, G. (2016). Monotonic, low-cycle fatigue, and ultralow-cycle fatigue behaviors of the X52, X60, and X65 piping steel grades. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 138(3), 031403.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4032277

Google Scholar

[10] Shamsuddoha, M., Islam, M.M., Aravinthan, T., Manalo, A., and Lau, K.T. (2013). Effectiveness of using fibre-reinforced polymer composites for underwater steel pipeline repairs. Composite Structures, 100,40-54.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.019

Google Scholar

[11] Saeed, N., Ronagh, H., and Virk, A. (2014). Composite repair of pipelines, considering the effect of live pressure - Analytical and numerical models with respect to ISO/TS 24817 and ASME PCC-2. Composites: Part B, 58, 605-610.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.035

Google Scholar

[12] Duell, J.M., Wilson, J.M., and Kessler, M.R. (2008). Analysis of a carbon composite overwrap pipeline repair system. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 85, 782-788.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.08.001

Google Scholar

[13] Leong, A.Y.L., Leong, K.H., Tan, Y.C., Liew, P.F.M., Wood, C.D., Tian, W. and Kozielski, K.A. (2011). Overwrap composite repairs of offshore risers at topside and splash zone. Proceedings of 18th International Committee on Composite Materials (ICCM-18). 21st - 26th August 2011. Jeju Island, Korea.

Google Scholar

[14] Chan, P.H., Tshai, K.Y., Johnson, M., Choo, H.L., Li, S., and Zakaria, K. (2015). Burst strength of carbon fibre reinforced polyethylene strip pipeline repair system – A numerical and experimental approach. Journal of Composite Materials, 49(6), 749-756.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998314525652

Google Scholar

[15] ASME International. (2011). ASME PCC-2-2011. Repair of Pressure Equipment and Piping. New York, USA: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

Google Scholar

[16] ISO. (2006). ISO/TS 2481. Petroleum, Petrochemical and Natural Gas Industries – Composite Repairs of Pipework – Qualification and Design, Installation, Testing and Inspection. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.

DOI: 10.3403/30141798u

Google Scholar

[17] Farrag, K. (2013). Selection of Pipe Repair Methods. Final Report GTI - Project Number 21087, Gas Technology Institute.

Google Scholar

[18] Lim, K.S., Azraai, S.N.A., Yahaya, N., Zardasti, L., and Noor, M.N. (2017). Strength development of epoxy grouts for pipeline rehabilitation. Jurnal Teknologi (Science & Engineering), 79(1), 9-14.

DOI: 10.11113/jt.v79.9339

Google Scholar

[19] Tang, L. C., Wan, Y. J., Yan, D., Pei, Y. B., Zhao, L., Li, Y. B., and Lai, G. Q. (2013). The effect of graphene dispersion on the mechanical properties of graphene/epoxy composites. Carbon, 60, 16-27.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.050

Google Scholar

[20] Ugent Tech Sdn. Bhd. (2014). Graphene Nanoplatelets UG Pro 680 technical data sheet.

Google Scholar

[21] Antaki, G. A. (2003). Piping and Pipeline Engineering: Design, Construction, Maintenance, Integrity, and Repair. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, U.S.A.

DOI: 10.1201/9780203911150.fmatt

Google Scholar

[22] Liu, H. (2003). Pipeline Engineering. Lewis Publishers, New York, U.S.A.

Google Scholar

[23] Chatterjee, S., Nafazarefi, F., Tai, N.H., Schlagenhauf, L., and Chu, B.T.T. (2012). Size and synergy effects of nanofiller hybrids including graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes in mechanical properties of epoxy composites. Carbon, 50, 5380-5386.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.021

Google Scholar