Investigation of Carbon Composition for Electrochemical Properties as PEMFC Cathode Catalyst

Article Preview

Abstract:

Nitrogen –doped carbon material using non-precious metal was developed as catalyst fuel cell (PEMFC). In the PEMFC, the cathode reaction occurs three times slower than anode reaction. Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in the cathode has major limit performance. Pt/C was used as high-cost catalyst materials but many researchers concerned to improve cathode catalyst performance using high-performance and low-cost materials. Nitrogen based active sites on carbon has important role for oxygen reduction reactions process. In this study, compositions of carbon for Fe-N-C were investigated to understand the electrochemical properties and morphological analysis. Urea and PVP as nitrogen (N) source was mixed with graphite (Gt). The ratio of Gt and N were 1:1, 3:1, and 1:3. The mixture was added to FeCl3.6H2O dissolved in ethanol to produce Fe-N/C catalyst. Subsequently powder was introduced to the furnace for the pyrolysis. The catalyst products were analyzed using Potentiostat to show the electrochemical properties of catalyst, X-Ray Diffractometer (XRD) was used to know the compound or phases after catalyst syntheses, Scanning Electron Microscope – Energy Dispersive X-Ray (SEM-EDX) was used to identify the morphology and the chemical compositions of catalyst. As a result, Fe – Gt : N = 1:3 catalyst had the greatest electrochemical properties which is identified by large area of CV curve. This catalyst also had the highest current density for reduction reaction. The presence of Fe2O3 and FeS caused the degreasing of catalytic activity. As conclusions of this research, carbon composition had the important rule to improve the ORR activity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

13-18

Citation:

Online since:

July 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B. Zohuri, Application of compact heat exchangers for combined cycle driven efficiency in next generation nuclear power plants: a novel approach, Springer, (2015).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23537-0

Google Scholar

[2] O.Z. Sharaf, M.F. Orhan, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 32 (2014) 810.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Wang, S. Li, G. Zhu, W. Zhao, R. Chen, M. Pan, Journal of Power Sources 240 (2013) 381.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Serov, M.J. Workman, K. Artyushkova, P. Atanassov, G. McCool, S. McKinney, H. Romero, B. Halevi, T. Stephenson, Journal of Power Sources 327 (2016) 557.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.087

Google Scholar

[5] A. Serov, M. Padilla, A.J. Roy, P. Atanassov, T. Sakamoto, K. Asazawa, H. Tanaka, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 53 (2014) 10336.

DOI: 10.1002/anie.201404734

Google Scholar

[6] S. Stariha, K. Artyushkova, M.J. Workman, A. Serov, S. Mckinney, B. Halevi, P. Atanassov, Journal of Power Sources 326 (2016) 43.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.098

Google Scholar

[7] H. Deng, Q. Li, J. Liu, F. Wang, Carbon 112 (2017) 219.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Mukerjee, S. Srinivasan, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 357 (1993) 201.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Li, Z. Liu, F. Wang, J. Xuan, Journal of energy chemistry 26 (2017) 422.

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Tang, B.L. Allen, D.R. Kauffman, A. Star, Journal of the American Chemical Society 131 (2009) 13200.

Google Scholar

[11] P. Wang, Z. Ma, Z. Zhao, L. Jia, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 611 (2007) 87.

Google Scholar

[12] B. Huang, L. Peng, F. Yang, Y. Liu, Z. Xie, Journal of energy chemistry 26 (2017) 712.

Google Scholar

[13] V.A. Setyowati, H.-C. Huang, C.-C. Liu, C.-H. Wang, Electrochimica Acta 211 (2016) 933.

Google Scholar

[14] V. Paredes-García, D. Venegas-Yazigi, R.O. Latorre, E. Spodine, Polyhedron 25 (2006) (2026).

DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2006.01.006

Google Scholar

[15] R. Jiang, D. Chu, Journal of Power Sources 245 (2014) 352.

Google Scholar

[16] R. Zheng, Z. Mo, S. Liao, H. Song, Z. Fu, P. Huang, Carbon 69 (2014) 132.

Google Scholar

[17] F. Pérez-Alonso, M.A. Salam, T. Herranz, J.G. de La Fuente, S. Al-Thabaiti, S. Basahel, M. Peña, J. Fierro, S. Rojas, Journal of power sources 240 (2013) 494.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.086

Google Scholar

[18] H. Li, H.-J. Zhang, X. Li, S. Zheng, B. Zhao, J. Yang, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39 (2014) 3198.

Google Scholar

[19] X. Ren, B. Liao, Y. Li, P. Zhang, L. Deng, Y. Gao, Electrochimica Acta 228 (2017) 36.

Google Scholar

[20] S.-T. Chang, H.-C. Hsu, H.-C. Huang, C.-H. Wang, H.-Y. Du, L.-C. Chen, J.-F. Lee, K.-H. Chen, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37 (2012) 13755.

Google Scholar

[21] J. Zhang, D. He, H. Su, X. Chen, M. Pan, S. Mu, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2 (2014) 1242.

Google Scholar

[22] Z. Mo, H. Peng, H. Liang, S. Liao, Electrochimica Acta 99 (2013) 30.

Google Scholar

[23] G. Wu, C.M. Johnston, N.H. Mack, K. Artyushkova, M. Ferrandon, M. Nelson, J.S. Lezama-Pacheco, S.D. Conradson, K.L. More, D.J. Myers, P. Zelenay, Journal of Materials Chemistry 21 (2011) 11392.

DOI: 10.1039/c0jm03613g

Google Scholar

[24] M.-Q. Wang, C. Ye, M. Wang, T.-H. Li, Y.-N. Yu, S.-J. Bao, Energy Storage Materials 11 (2018) 112.

Google Scholar

[25] Z. Mo, H. Peng, H. Liang, S. Liao, Electrochimica Acta 99 (2013) 30.

Google Scholar