Calculation Models of the Bearing Capacity of Span Reinforced Concrete Structure Support Zones

Abstract:

Experience gained in design, erection and operation of span reinforced concrete structures has proved that practically all of them are subject to complex stress-strain state. At that, the researchers pay considerable greater attention to calculation of strength, deformation analysis and determination of crack resistance in normal cross-sections than to calculation of their support zones, including oblique sections, which results are generally taken into account for determining the section dimensions and the quantity of the cross reinforcement.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 968)
• Pages: 209-226
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.968.209
• Online since: August 2019
• Authors: Vasyl M. Karpiuk*, Yulia A. Syomina, Diana V. Antonova
• Keywords: Axial Force, Bending Moment, Failure Pattern, Oblique Section, Reinforced Concrete, Span Structure, Support Zone, Torque Moment, Transverse Force

References

[1] O.B. Golishev, Kurs lektsIy z osnov rozrahunku budIvelnih konstruktsIy I z oporu zalIzobetonu, Logos, Kiyiv, (2004).

[2] A.I. Davidenko, A.N. Bambura, S.Yu. Belyaeva, N.V. Prisyazhnyuk, K raschetu prochnosti secheniy, naklonnyih k prodolnoy osi elementa, s ispolzovaniem polnoy diagrammyi deformirovaniya betona, MehanIka I fizika ruynuvannya budIvelnih materIalIv ta konstruktsIy. 7 (2007). P. 209–216.

[3] EN 1992 – 1: 2001 (Final Draft, April, 2002) Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures. Part 1 General Rules and Rules for Buildings. (2004).

[4] A.M. Bambura , EksperimentalnI osnovi prikladnoYi deformatsIynoYi teorIYi zalIzobetonu. Avtoreferat disertatsIYi na zdobuttya naukovogo stupenya doktora tehnIchnih nauk: spets. 05.23.01 «BudIvelnI konstruktsIYi, budIvlI ta sporudi, HarkIv, (2006).

[5] V.P. Mitrofanov, V.A. Kotlyarov, Obschaya teoriya rascheta prochnosti zhelezobetonnyih elementov po naklonnyim i normalnyim treschinam, Stroitelstvo i arhitektura. 9 (1990). P.3–9.

[6] H.R. Hadzhi, Nesuschaya sposobnost i raschet po naklonnyim secheniyam zhelezobetonnyih balok, vyipolnennyih s primeneniem betona na poristyih zapolnitelyah. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie nauchnoy stepeni kandidata tehnicheskih nauk: spets. 05.23.01 Stroitelnyie konstruktsii, zdaniya i sooruzheniya,, Odessa, (1985).

[7] V.M. Karpyuk, Napryazhenno–deformirovannoe sostoyanie izgibaemyih trehsloynyih zhelezobetonnyih elementov. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na zdobuttya na soiskanie nauchnoy stepeni kandidata tehnicheskih nauk: spets. 05.23.01 Stroitelnyie konstruktsii, zdaniya i sooruzheniya,, Odessa, (1989).

[8] V.S. Dorofeev, V.M. Karpyuk, K.I. Artyushkina i dr., Modelirovanie napryazhenno–deformirovannogo sostoyaniya zhelezobetonnyih elementov pri prodolno–poperechnom izgibe, VIsnik OdeskoYi derzhavnoYi akademIYi budIvnitstva ta arhItekturi. 28 (2008). 137–148.

[9] V.S. DorofEEv, V.M. Karpyuk, K.E. Polyanska, NelInIyniy skIncheno–elementniy rozrahunok zvichaynih, nerozrIznih ta pozatsentrovo stisnutih zalIzobetonnih balok. MaterIali naukovo-tehnIchnoYi konferentsIYi «ResursozberIgayuchI tehnologIYi v proektuvannI, zemlevporyadkuvannI ta budIvnitstva». 1/2011 (66), (2011). P. 89–96.

[10] V.S. DorofEEv, V.M. Karpyuk, O.M. Petrov, Nesucha zdatnIst priopornih dIlyanok zalIzobetonnih elementIv pri poperechnomu zginI zI stisnenim ta vIlnim kruchennyam. BudIvelnI konstruktsIYi. 74 (2011). P. 118–133.

[11] V.S. DorofEEv, V.M. Karpyuk, F.R. Karp'yuk, O.V. Stepura, NelInIyniy rozrahunok poperedno napruzhenih tavrovih zalIzobetonnih elementIv z vikoristannyam PK Lira 9.6,. BudIvelnI konstruktsIYi. 74 (2011). P. 134–144.

[12] DBN V.2.6-98: 2009. KonstruktsIya budinkIv I sporud. BetonnI ta zalIzobetonnI konstruktsIYi. OsnovnI polozhennya proektuvannya, MInregIonbud UkraYini, KiYiv, (2009).

[13] DSTU B V.2.6-156: 2010. KonstruktsIYi budinkIv I sporud. BetonnI ta zalIzobetonI konstruktsIYi z vazhkogo betonu. Pravila proektuvannya, MInregIonbud UkraYini, KiYiv, (2011).

[14] A.S. Zalesov, Yu.A. Klimov, Prochnost zhelezobetonnyih konstruktsiy pri deystvii poperechnyih sil, BudIvelnik, KiYiv, (1989).

[15] A.A. Gvozdev, Novoe v proektirovanii betonnyih i zhelezobetonnyih konstruktsiy, Stroyizdat, Moskva, (1978).

[16] V.V. Novak, F.V. Vinokur, Yu.V. Novak, Sovershenstvovanie metoda rascheta prochnosti konstruktsiy po naklonnyim secheniyam. Beton i zhelezobeton. 12 (1984). P. 40 – 42.

[17] S.P. Timoshenko, Teoriya uprugosti, Nauka, Moskva, (1975).

[18] K.V. Mihaylov, Novoe o prochnosti zhelezobetona, Stroyizdat, Moskva, (1977).

[19] G.A. Geniev, V.N. Kissyuk, G.A. Tyupin, Teoriya plastichnosti betona i zhelezobetona, Stroyizdat, Moskva, (1974).

[20] V.M. Kruglov, Nelineynyie sootnosheniya i kriteriy prochnosti betona v trehosnom napryazhennom sostoyanii. Stroitelnaya mehanika i raschet sooruzheniy. 1 (1987) 40–44.

[21] N.I. Karpenko, Obschie modeli mehaniki zhelezobetona, Stroyizdat, Moskva, (1996).

[22] G.N. Stavrov, L.L. Kuksha, K opredeleniyu usiliya v prodolnoy armature v naklonnyih secheniya. Beton i zhelezobeton. 12 (1978). P. 25–26.

[23] V.S. Dorofeev, V.M. Karpyuk, F.R. Karpyuk, Prochnost, treschinostoykost i deformativnost predvaritelno napryazhennyih tavrovyih zhelezobetonnyih elementov, Even, Odessa, (2010).

[24] V.M. Karpyuk, A.I. Kostyuk, Yu.A. Semina, General Case of Nonlinear Deformation-Strength Model of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Strength of Materials. 50(3) (2018) 453–464.

DOI: 10.1007/s11223-018-9990-9

[25] SP 52.101.2003. Betonnyie i zhelezobetonnyie konstruktsii bez predvaritelnogo napryazheniya armaturyi, Moskva, (2004).

[26] V. Karpiuk, A. Kostiuk, O. Maistrenko, Yu. Somina, Influence of intermittent cyclic loading on reinforced concrete resistance model, Electronic journal of the faculty of civil engineering of Osijek, Croatia. 15 (2017). P. 59-74.

DOI: 10.13167/2017.15.6