Investigation of the Impact of Cutting Parameters on Surface Integrity in the End Milling of Inconel 625

Article Preview

Abstract:

Nickel based super alloys, such as Inconel 625 is amongst the most difficult to machine, due to its low thermal conductivity and high strength at higher temperature. Although, they are used in aerospace exhaust systems and other applications, the strain hardening that results during the machining operation, which adversely affects surface integrity of machined surface of such materials especially in extensive applications, is a cause for concern. In this context, this study was carried out, involving the milling operation, using solid carbide tools coated with TiAlSiN, under specifically developed conditions for dry machining of the difficult to cut materials. The cutting parameters were 4 in number, namely radial rake angle, feed per tooth, cutting speed and radial depth of cut and the response parameters included surface integrity characteristics, such as residual stresses, surface roughness and micro-hardness. Based on the experimental analyses, it was found that the micro-hardness of machined surface was higher. Micro hardness of sub surface decreases with the depth (50,100,150,250μm) due to a reduction in the work hardening of the Inconel 625, underneath the surface layer. The residual stresses were analyzed using main effect plot, and it was seen that the residual stresses were significantly influenced by the radial rake angle, followed by feed per tooth.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

762-767

Citation:

Online since:

August 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Chandra Nath, Zachary Brooks and Thomas R. Kurfess, On Machinability Study and Process Optimization in Face Milling of stone Alloys with Indexable Copy Face Mill Insrts, Procedia Manufacturing Volume 1, 2015, Pages 487-500.

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.008

Google Scholar

[2] Yuan Gao, Xin Huang, Mingjie Lin, Zhengguo Wang and Ronglei Sun, Analysis and prediction of surface integrity in machining: a review, Applied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 610 (2014) pp.1002-1020.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.610.1002

Google Scholar

[3] T.Kitagawa, A. Kubo, K. Maekawa, Temperature and wear of cutting tools in high speed machining of Inconel 718 and Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn, Wear 202 (1997) 142-148.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(96)07255-9

Google Scholar

[4] Adrien Cellier, Florent Chalon, Virginie Grimal-Perrigouas, David Bonhoure & RenéLeroy, Effects of Cutting Angles in Ti-6al-4v Milling Process on Surface Integrity: Influence of Roughness and Residual Stresses on Fatigue Limit, Machining Science and Technology, An International Journal, 18:4, 565-584.

DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2014.955369

Google Scholar

[5] I.A. Choudhury, M.A.EI-Baradie, Machinability of nickel base super alloys: a general review, Journal of materials processing technology 77 (1998) 278-284.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(97)00429-9

Google Scholar

[6] D.G. Thakur, B. Ramamoorthy, L.Vijayaraghavan, Effect of cutting parameters on the degree of work hardening and tool life during high-speed machining of Inconel 718, Int.J.Adv.Manuf. 59 (2012) 483-489.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3529-6

Google Scholar

[7] M. Dogra, V.S. Sharma, A. Sachdeva, N.M. Suri, J.S. Dureja, Tool wear, chip formation and workpiece surface issues in CBN hard turning: A review, Int.J. Precis. Eng. Man. 11 (2010) 341- 358.

DOI: 10.1007/s12541-010-0040-1

Google Scholar

[8] R. M. Arunachalam, M. A. Mannan and A. C. Spowage, Residual stress and surface roughness when facing age hardened Inconel 718 with CBN and ceramic cutting tools, International journal of machine tool and manufacturing 44 (2004) 879 – 887.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.02.016

Google Scholar

[9] R.S. Pawade, Suhas S. Joshi, P.K. Brahmankar, Effect of machining parameters and cutting edge geometry on surface integrity of high speed turned Inconel 718, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 48 (2008) 15–28.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.08.004

Google Scholar