Adapting ANFIS to Improve Field Rebound Hammer Test for Concrete Compressive Strength Estimation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Rebound hammer tests are one of the most popular non-destructive testing methods to examine the concrete compressive strength in the field. Rebound hammer tests are relatively easy to conduct and low cost. More importantly, it will not cause damage to the existing structure and can obtain the results in a short time. However, concrete compressive strength estimations provided by rebound hammer tests have an average of around 20% mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) when comparing to the results from destructive tests. This research proposes an alternative approach to estimate the concrete compressive strengths using the rebound hammer test data. The alternative approach is to adopt the Artificial Neural Fuzzy Inference Systems, ANFIS, to develop an AI-based prediction model for the rebound hammer tests. A total of 100 rebound hammer tests are conducted in a 24-story residential building. Core samples are carefully taken to obtain the actual compressive tests. The data collected are used to train and validate the ANFIS prediction model. The results show that the proposed ANFIS model has successfully reduced the MAPE to 10.01%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

191-196

Citation:

Online since:

January 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H.Y. Qasrawi, Concrete strength by combined nondestructive methods simply and reliably predicted, "Cement and Concrete Research,, vol. 30, no. 5 (2000), pp.739-746.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00226-x

Google Scholar

[2] I.A. Basheer, and M. Hajmeer, Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application,, Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 43, no. 1 (2000) , pp.3-31.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00201-3

Google Scholar

[3] W. L. Huang, C. Y. Chang, W. C. Chen, C. N. We: Using ANNs to Improve Prediction Accuracy for Rebound Hammers, Taiwan Highway Engineering, vol. 37, no. 2 (2001), pp.2-18.

Google Scholar

[4] Sousa, S. I. V., Martins, F. G., Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M. and Pereira, M. C.: Multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks based on principal components to predict ozone concentrations. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(1) (2007), pp.97-103.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.002

Google Scholar

[5] Sadrmomtazi, A., J. Sobhani, and M. A. Mirgozar: Modeling compressive strength of EPS lightweight concrete using regression, neural network and ANFIS, Construction and Building Materials 42 (2013), pp.205-216.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.016

Google Scholar

[6] Brencich, A., Cassini, G., Pera, D. and Riotto, G.: Calibration and reliability of the rebound (Schmidt) hammer test. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 1(3) (2013), pp.66-78.

DOI: 10.13189/cea.2013.010303

Google Scholar

[7] Information on https://theconstructor.org/concrete/rebound-hammer-test-concrete-ndt/2837/.

Google Scholar

[8] Qasrawi, H. Y.: Concrete strength by combined nondestructive methods simply and reliably predicted, Cement and concrete research 30.5 (2000), pp.739-746.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00226-x

Google Scholar

[9] Breysse, D., and Martínez-Fernández, J. L.: Assessing concrete strength with rebound hammer: review of key issues and ideas for more reliable conclusions. Materials and structures, 47(9) (2014), pp.1589-1604.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-013-0139-9

Google Scholar

[10] Brencich, A., Cassini, G., Pera, D., & Riotto, G.: Calibration and reliability of the rebound (Schmidt) hammer test. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 1(3) (2013), pp.66-78.

DOI: 10.13189/cea.2013.010303

Google Scholar

[11] Jang, J. S. R.: ANFIS:Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 23 (3) (1993), pp.665-685.

DOI: 10.1109/21.256541

Google Scholar

[12] Abraham, A.: Adaptation of Fuzzy Inference System Using Neural Learning, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 181 (2005), pp.53-83.

DOI: 10.1007/11339366_3

Google Scholar

[13] Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M., & Mousazadeh, H.: Development of an intelligent system based on ANFIS for predicting wheat grain yield on the basis of energy inputs. Information processing in agriculture, 1(1) (2014), pp.14-22.

DOI: 10.1016/j.inpa.2014.04.001

Google Scholar

[14] Abdulshahed, A. M., Longstaff, P. and Fletcher, A.: The application of ANFIS prediction models for thermal error compensation on CNC machine tools, Applied Soft Computing 27 (2015), pp.158-168.

DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.012

Google Scholar

[15] Vural, Y., Ingham, D. B., and Pourkashanian, M.: Performance prediction of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell using the ANFIS model, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(22) (2009), pp.9181-9187.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.096

Google Scholar

[16] Boyacioglu, M. A., and Avci, D.: An adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for the prediction of stock market return: the case of the Istanbul stock exchange, Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12) (2010), pp.7908-7912.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.045

Google Scholar