Failure Analysis and Service Life Prediction of 80SH Casing Steel under Thermal Cycle Service Environment

Article Preview

Abstract:

The main exploitation process of heavy oil is cyclic steam huff and puff. Cyclic operation causes cumulative damage to thermal recovery casing and causes a large number of failures. Failure analysis shows that the main failure factor of thermal recovery casing is the low cycle fatigue process caused by thermal cycle, which results in the decrease of strength of casing material, thus causing casing fracture and failure. Based on the failure analysis results, the low cycle fatigue tests of 80SH thermal recovery casing steel under different temperature, strain, pre-strain and other conditions were carried out. The influencing factors, life prediction model and criterion of service safety of casing materials under thermal recovery service conditions were first proposed, which provides a strong theoretical basis for the service safety design theory of thermal recovery casing materials. The research shows that the strain limit and low cycle fatigue life are the two core issues of service life. Life predictions need to satisfy two criteria. The first is the strain criterion. The strain limit should be lower than the total strain during the long service life. And the second is the low cycle fatigue criterion, which satisfies the expectation of low cycle fatigue life under double conditions of strain amplitude and mean strain.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1293-1300

Citation:

Online since:

May 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Jianjun Wang, Shangyu Yang, Chengwen Xue, et al. Strain design method for casing strings in heavy oil thermal recovery well [J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2017, 41(1): 150-155.

Google Scholar

[2] Laiju Han, Jianghong Jia, Zhenlai Yan. A casing design method based on strain variations for wells in thermal recovery processes [J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2014, 38(3): 68-72.

Google Scholar

[3] Long Yu. Study on the creep - fatigue interaction of high - NbTiAl alloys [D]; University of Science and Technology Beijing, (2016).

Google Scholar

[4] Tiecheng Yang. Investigation of fatigue creep behavior and lief estimation of pressure vessel steel 1.25Cr0.5Mo at high temperature [D]; Zhejiang University, (2006).

Google Scholar

[5] Cerri E, Evangelista E, Spigarelli S, et al. Evolution of microstructure in a modified 9Cr–1Mo steel during short term creep [J]. Materials Science & Engineering A, 1998, 245(2): 285-292.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(97)00717-x

Google Scholar

[6] Bouvard J L, Chaboche J L, Feyel F, et al. A cohesive zone model for fatigue and creep–fatigue crack growth in single crystal superalloys [J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2009, 31(5): 868-879.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.002

Google Scholar

[7] Fan Z, Chen X, Chen L, et al. Fatigue–creep behavior of 1.25Cr0.5Mo steel at high temperature and its life prediction [J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2007, 29(6): 1174-83.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.07.008

Google Scholar

[8] Hong J W, Nam S W, Rie K T. A model for life prediction in low-cycle fatigue with hold time [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1985, 20(10): 3763-3770.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01113785

Google Scholar

[9] Wei W, Feng Y, Han L, et al. Cyclic hardening and dynamic strain aging during low-cycle fatigue of Cr-Mo tempered martensitic steel at elevated temperatures [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A-structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 2018, 734: 20-26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.07.084

Google Scholar

[10] Wei W, Feng Y, Han L, et al. High-Temperature Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of HS80H Ferritic–Martensitic Steel Under Dynamic Strain Aging [J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2018, 27(12): 6629-6635.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-018-3726-7

Google Scholar

[11] Talemi R H, Chhith S, Waele W D. Experimental and numerical study on effect of forming process on low‐cycle fatigue behaviour of high‐strength steel [J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, (2017).

DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12625

Google Scholar

[12] Lei H, Akebono H, Kato M, et al. Fatigue life prediction method for AISI 316 stainless steel under variable-amplitude loading considering low-amplitude loading below the endurance limit in the ultrahigh cycle regime [J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2017, 101: 18-26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.04.006

Google Scholar

[13] Brnic J, Canadija M, Turkalj G, et al. Structural Steel ASTM A709-Behavior at Uniaxial Tests Conducted at Lowered and Elevated Temperatures, Short-Time Creep Response, and Fracture Toughness Calculation [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 136(9): 1083-1089.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000152

Google Scholar

[14] Goll W, Spilker H, Toscano E H. Short-time creep and rupture tests on high burnup fuel rod cladding [J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2001, 289(3): 247-253.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(01)00438-x

Google Scholar

[15] Lihong Han, Bin Xie, Hang Wang, et al. Strain-based design of casing strings for serving cyclic steam stimulation thermal well [J]. Steel pipe, 2016, 45(3): 11-18.

Google Scholar

[16] Kassner M E, Smith K. Low temperature creep plasticity [J]. Journal of Materials Research & Technology, 2014, 3(3): 280-288.

Google Scholar

[17] Kaiser T M V. Post-Yield Material Characterization for Strain-Based Design[J]. Spe Journal, 2009, 14(1): 128-134.

DOI: 10.2118/97730-pa

Google Scholar

[18] Jing Li, Chengyan Lin, Shaochun Yang, et al. Analysis on mechanism of casing damage and strength design for heavy oil wells[J].Oil Field Equipment,2009,38(01):9-13.

Google Scholar

[19] Nowinka J, Kaiser T M V, Lepper B. Strain-Based Design of Tubulars for Extreme-Service Wells [J]. Spe Drilling & Completion, 2008, 23(4): 353-360.

DOI: 10.2118/105717-pa

Google Scholar

[20] Niesłony A, Dsoki C E, Kaufmann H, et al. New method for evaluation of the Manson–Coffin–Basquin and Ramberg–Osgood equations with respect to compatibility [J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008, 30(10–11): 1967-1977.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.01.012

Google Scholar

[21] Shimada K, Komotori J, Shimizu M. The applicability of the Manson-Coffin law and Miner's law to extremely low cycle fatigue [J]. Nihon Kikai Gakkai RonbunshuA Hen/transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers Part A, 1987, 53(491): 1178-1185.

DOI: 10.1299/kikaia.53.1178

Google Scholar

[22] Wei W, Han L, Wang H, et al. Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior and Fracture Mechanism of HS80H Steel at Different Strain Amplitudes and Mean Strains [J]. Journal of Materials Engineering & Performance, 2017, 26(4): 1717-1725.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-017-2575-0

Google Scholar

[23] Han L, Wang H, Wang J, et al. Strain Based Design and Field Application of Thermal Well Casing String for Cyclic Steam Stimulation Production; proceedings of the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, F, 2016 [C].

DOI: 10.2118/180703-ms

Google Scholar

[24] Wenlan Wei, Hang Wang, Lihong Han, et al. Research of Steady creep rate and mechanism of 80SH steel under intermediate temperature critical stress condition [J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2019, 44(03):27-31.

Google Scholar