Quantification of Crack-Tip Constraint Effect on Master Curve Reference Temperature Based on Two-Parameter Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

The master curve has evolved into a mature technology for characterizing the fracture toughness transition of ferritic steels. However, it is well known that the master curve reference temperature (To) values estimated from small laboratory specimen may be biased low due to loss of crack-tip constraint. To quantify such variations of To resulting from differences of crack-tip constraint of testing specimen, two-parameter fracture mechanics approaches are employed in the present study. In this context, fracture toughness test and 3-dimensional finite element (FE) analysis for several standard and nonstandard test specimens are performed to quantify relationship between variations of To and constraint parameters and to find best constraint parameter representing effect of crack-tip constraint on To values evidently. Based on testing and present FE results, To and constraint parameter loci are constructed and engineering To correlation models considering crack-tip constraint are suggested

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 110)

Pages:

89-96

Citation:

Online since:

March 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] ASTM International: Test Standard E1921-03 (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] C. Betegon and J.W. Hancock: Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 58 (1991), pp.104-110.

Google Scholar

[3] M.L. Williams: Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 24 (1957), pp.109-114.

Google Scholar

[4] N.P. O'Dowd and C.F. Shih: Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 39 (1991), pp.989-1015.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Clausmeyer, K. Kussmaul and E. Roos: Journal of Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol. 44 (1991), pp.77-92.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Roos, L. Stumpfrock, X. Schuler and U. Eisele: International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, Vol. 82 (2005), pp.355-362.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.11.004

Google Scholar

[7] F.M. Beremin: Metallurgical Transactions A, Vol. 14 (1983), pp.2277-2287.

Google Scholar

[8] ABAQUS Version 6. 4-1. User's manual, ABAQUS, Inc (2003).

Google Scholar

[9] K. Wallin: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 68 (2001), pp.303-328.

Google Scholar