Influences of Elastic Stress and Interfacial Kinetic Barrier on Phase Evolution Paths of Thin-Film Diffusion Couples

Article Preview

Abstract:

An explicit, finite difference scheme was used to examine the effects of coherency stresses and interface kinetic barriers on the phase evolution of a binary, thin-film diffusion couple. Thin-films, initially consisting of alternating layers of two terminal phases, α and γ, were held at a temperature at which the formation of an intermediate phase, β, at α/γ interface was thermodynamically probable. When either the coherency stresses or interface kinetic barriers are present, the interfacial compositions become time-dependent and, thus, the formation of the thermodynamically stable β phase can be kinetically prohibited at the early stage of the evolution. Even if the initial α/γ thin-films have the same overall composition, the coherency constraint can result in different final equilibrium states depending on either the initial compositions of the α and γ phases or the relative magnitudes of the interfacial kinetic barriers. When both the coherency constraint and interfacial kinetic barriers are present, an intermediate phase can repeatedly form and disappear during the evolution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 118)

Pages:

405-412

Citation:

Online since:

December 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K.N. Tu and J.W. Mayer, in: Thin Films, Interdiffusion and Reactions, edited by J.M. Poate, K.N. Tu, and J.W. Mayer, chapter 10, Wiley-Interscience, New York (1978).

DOI: 10.1002/pol.1979.130170107

Google Scholar

[2] V.I. Dybkov: Growth Kinetics of Chemical Compound Layers (Cambridge International Science, Cambridge, 1998).

Google Scholar

[3] F.M. d'Heurle: J. Mater. Res. Vol. 3 (1988), p.167.

Google Scholar

[4] U. Gösele and K.N. Tu: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 53 (1982), p.3252.

Google Scholar

[5] W.C. Johnson and C. Martin: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 68 (1990), p.1252.

Google Scholar

[6] W.C. Johnson: Acta mater. Vol. 48 (2000), p.1021.

Google Scholar

[7] W.C. Johnson and P.H. Leo: Metall. Mater. Trans. A Vol. 33A (2002), p. (1901).

Google Scholar

[8] F.C. Larché and J.W. Cahn: Acta Metall. Vol. 21 (1973), p.1051.

Google Scholar

[9] M.E. Gurtin and P.W. Voorhees: Acta mater. Vol. 44 (1996), p.235.

Google Scholar