Microstructure and Thermal Stability of Carbon Nanotubes Dispersed Alumina Nanocomposites Prepared by Spark Plasma Sintering

Yong Ho Choa; Seung Hwa Yoo; Jae Kyo Yang; Chul Kyu Song; Sung Tag Oh; Se Joong Yoon; Sung Goon Kang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.119.59

Paper Titles

Characterization of Nano Scaled Mullite Powders Prepared by Organic-Inorganic Solution Technique
p.43

Preparation and Characterization of Anti-Fogging Low Density Polymer Film
p.47

Ion Conducting Behaviors of Polymeric Composite Electrolytes Containing Mesoporous Silicates
p.51

Preparation and Characterization of Activated Carbon Nanofiber Webs Containing Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes by Electrospinning
p.55

Microstructure and Thermal Stability of Carbon Nanotubes Dispersed Alumina Nanocomposites Prepared by Spark Plasma Sintering
p.59

Properties of Dispersion Strengthened Cu-TiB₂ Nanocomposites Prepared by Spark Plasma Sintering
p.63

Preparation of TiO₂ Nanorod Arrays by Electrophoretic Deposition of Titania Nanoparticles
p.67

Synthesis and Characterization of Co Nanoparticles by Solventless Thermal Decomposition
p.71

The Fabrication of Iron Sulfide Powders for Enhancing the Machinability and the Comparison of Machining Behavior at the Sintered Steel
p.75

HomeSolid State PhenomenaSolid State Phenomena Vol. 119Microstructure and Thermal Stability of Carbon...

Microstructure and Thermal Stability of Carbon Nanotubes Dispersed Alumina Nanocomposites Prepared by Spark Plasma Sintering

Abstract:

The influence of relative density on the thermal stability of CNTs-dispersed Al2O3 nanocomposites has been investigated by using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). TGA revealed that the onset temperature for weight loss increased with an increasing sintering temperature and CNT content. By taking account of the XRD and SEM results, it is suggested that the weight loss is caused by a decomposition of CNTs phase by oxidative atmosphere. The difference in thermal stability was explained by the porosity effect on the oxidation and decomposition behavior of CNTs, because the open pores promote the chemical reaction and gas flow of reactants.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Nanocomposites and Nanoporous Materials VII

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 119)

Pages:

59-62

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.119.59

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2007

Authors:

Yong Ho Choa, Seung Hwa Yoo, Jae Kyo Yang, Chul Kyu Song, Sung Tag Oh, Se Joong Yoon, Sung Goon Kang

Keywords:

Carbon Nanotube (CN), Microstructure, Nanocomposite, Thermo Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] S. Iijima: Nature Vol. 354 (1991), p.56.

Google Scholar

[2] R.S. Ruoff and D.C. Lorents: Carbon Vol. 33 (1995), p.925.

Google Scholar

[3] G.D. Zhan, J.D. Kuntz, J. Wan and A.K. Mukherjee: Nature Mater. Vol. 2 (2003), p.38.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Peigney, C. Laurent, F. Flahaut and A. Rousset: Ceram. Int. Vol. 26 (2000), p.677.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Peigney, C. Laurent, O Dumortier and A. Rousset: J. Eur. Cer. Soc. Vol. 18 (1998), p. (1995).

Google Scholar

[6] C. -D. Park, H. -J. Jeon, H. -J. Wang, Y. -H Choa, S. -T. Oh, K. -M. Kang and S. -G. Kang: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 449-452 (2004), p.797.

Google Scholar

[7] S. -H. Yoo, H. -J. Wang, S. -T. Oh, S. -G. Kang and Y. -H. Choa: Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 317-318 (2006), p.665.

Google Scholar

[8] L.C. Stearns, J. Zhao and M.P. Harmer: J. Eur. Cer. Soc. Vol. 10 (1992), p.473.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Q. Zhu, H. G. Zhang, J. H. Zhang, J. Liang, Z. D. Gao, B. Q. Wei, D. H. Wu and M. J. Hui: J. Mater. Sci. Lett. Vol. 13 (1994), p.1104.

Google Scholar

[10] T.I.T. Okpalugo, P. Papakonstantinou, H. Murphy, J. Mclaughlin and N.M.D. Brown: Carbon Vol. 43 (2005), P. 2951.

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Xu, G. Ray and B. Abdel-Magid: Composites Part A Vol. 37 (2006), p.114. 520 540 560 580 600 620 640 Onset Temperature ( oC) 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 Relative Density (%) 2% CNTs 8% CNTs.

Google Scholar