The Digital Pre-Operative Planning of Hip Surgical Interventions

Article Preview

Abstract:

Computer technology has many applications in different fields of industry, health care and medicine. This encompasses paper-based information processing as well as data processing machines (Hospital information system or Clinical information system) and image digitalization of a large variety of medical diagnostic equipment (e.g. computer images of X-ray, MR, CT). The aim of the computer technology in medicine is to achieve the best possible support of patient care, preoperative surgery planning and administration by electronic data processing. At the present time in many countries of the worlds preoperative planning of interventions for lumbar joint is realized with caliper, protractor, plastic templates and x-ray images. Orthopaedic surgeons use transparent template radiographs as part of pre-operative planning in order to gauge the suitability and correct size of an implant. The newly developed CoXaM software offers a simple solution of the problems by using the digital x-ray images and handmade transparent plastic templates. The CoXaM software was developed in Visual Studio 2005 in the Visual C++ programming language at the Department of Biomedical Engineering and Measurement at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Kosice. The software was designed for pre-operative planning and helps to determine on the X-ray image a length dimensions, a center of rotation, an angle values. It enables the digitalization of plastic templates from several producers, which will assess the suitability of the type of implant.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 199)

Pages:

350-355

Citation:

Online since:

March 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Bencur J., Základy RTG diagnostických metód, vol. 1., 2nd ed. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo Osveta, 1962. 158 pp.

Google Scholar

[2] Blackley HR, Howell GE, Rorabeck CH. Planning and management of the difficult primary hip replacement: preoperative planning and technical considerations. Instr Course Lect. 2000; 49: 3–11.

Google Scholar

[3] Bono, J.: Digital Templating in Total Hip Replacement: A New Gold Standard?, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 86-B, Issue SUPP_IV, 413, (2004).

Google Scholar

[4] Cech O, Fassbender M, Kirschner P, Rozkydal Z. Preoperative planning and surgical technic in achieving stability and leg length equality in total hip joint arthroplasty (in Czech). Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2002; 69: 362–368.

Google Scholar

[5] Eggli S, Pisan M, Muller ME. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80: 382–390.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b3.0800382

Google Scholar

[6] Goldstein WM, Gordon A, Branson JJ. Leg length inequality in total hip arthroplasty. Or-thopedics. 2005; 28(9 suppl): s1037– 1040.

DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20050902-06

Google Scholar

[7] Goodman SB, Huene DS, Imrie S. Preoperative templating for the equalization of leg length in total hip arthroplasty. Contemp Orthop. 1992; 24: 703–710.

Google Scholar

[8] Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. The prevention of periprosthetic fractures in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30: 191–207.

DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70074-2

Google Scholar

[9] Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: classification and preoperative planning. Instr Course Lect. 2000; 49: 83–96.

DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199910000-00013

Google Scholar

[10] Knight JL, Atwater RD. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty: quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty. 1992; 7: 403–409.

DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(07)80031-3

Google Scholar

[11] Kosashvili Y, Shasha N, Olschewski E, Safir O, White L, Gross A, Backstein D: Digital versus conventional templating techniques in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty, Can J Surg. 2009 February; 52(1): 6–11.

DOI: 10.1503/cjs.000511

Google Scholar