Comparison of Human Health and Safety Loss due to Corroded Gas Pipeline Failure in Rural and Urban Areas: A Case Study in Malaysia

Article Preview

Abstract:

Consequence assessment is an integral part of the risk assessment process. There are many types of consequences loss due to pipeline failure such as asset loss, environmental loss, production loss, and human health and safety loss (HHSL). This paper studies the comparison of HHSL between rural and urban areas due to pipeline failure subject to corrosion. The damage area of the explosion was calculated using Aloha software by considering the details of the selected sites such as atmospheric and topographical conditions. The HHSL was calculated using a mathematical equation of quantitative risk assessment in terms of the number of fatalities or injuries or both. The results of the assessments from rural and urban areas were then compared with one another to identify any significant dissimilarity. This study shows that there was a possibility to improve the decisive value of risk by implementing the proposed approach in consequence assessment in Malaysia.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 227)

Pages:

221-224

Citation:

Online since:

January 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N.S. Arunraj, J. Maiti, A methodology for overall consequences modeling in chemical industry, J. Hazard. Mater. 169 (2009) 556-574.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.133

Google Scholar

[2] M.N. Norhazilan, Y. Nordin, K.S. Lim, R.O. Siti, A.R.A. Safuan, M.H. Norhamimi, Relationship between soil properties and corrosion of carbon steel, J. . Appl. Sci. Res. 8(3) (2012) 1739-1747.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Yahaya, N.M. Noor, M.M. Din, S.H.M. Nor, Prediction of CO2 corrosion growth in submarine pipelines, Malays. J. Civ. Eng. 21(1) (2009) 69-81.

Google Scholar

[4] ALOHA User's Manual, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, 2007, information on http: /www. epa. gov/swercepp/cameo/pubs/ALOHAManual. pdf.

Google Scholar

[5] O. Ashenfelter, Measuring the value of a statistical life: problems and prospects, IZA Discussion paper no. 1911, Princeton University, (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] D. Alexander, Principles of Emergency Planning and Management, Terra Publishing, Harpended, (2002).

Google Scholar

[7] Peter Barss, G.S. Smith, S.P. Baker, D. Mohan, Injury Prevention: An International Perspective: Epidemiology, Surveillance, and Policy, Oxford University Press, (1998).

DOI: 10.1136/ip.5.2.158-b

Google Scholar