Influence of the Method of Polymerization of Composite Material for Teeth Crown Fillings on its Strength Properties

Article Preview

Abstract:

Polymerization shrinkage of composite filling materials still becomes one of the most important features which decreases strength properties of reconstructed teeth crowns. From among various methods to reduce that disadvantageous phenomenon which are used in a dental practice sandwich filling processing of crown cavity seems to be the most effective one. The paper presents the results of the strength examination of the influence of the different ways of layered polymerization processing on the mechanical properties of modern hybrid micro composite material with regards to the following quantities: compressive strength, strain to fracture, modulus of elasticity and work to fracture.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 240)

Pages:

168-173

Citation:

Online since:

August 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Brännström, O. Vojinovič, Response of the dental pulp to invasion of bacteria around three filling materials, J Dent for Children 43 (1976), pp.15-21.

Google Scholar

[2] C.L. Davidson, A.J. Feilzer, Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives, J Dent., 25(1997), pp.435-440.

DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00063-2

Google Scholar

[3] R.R. Braga, J.L. Ferracane, Alternatives in Polymerization Contraction Stress Management, Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 15(2004), p.176 – 184.

Google Scholar

[4] J.L. Ferrance, Resin composite – state of the art, Dental Materials 27 (2011), p.29 – 38.

Google Scholar

[5] C.J. Kleverlaan, A.J. Feilzer, Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites, Dental Materials 21 (2005), p.1150 – 1157.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.004

Google Scholar

[6] M. Domarecka, J. Sokołowski, et al., Shrinkage stresses of dental composites (in Polish), proceed. XIV Conf. Biomaterials and Mechanics in Dentistry, Ustroń 2014, p.33.

Google Scholar

[7] R.L. Sakaguchi, J.M. Powers, Craig's Restorative Dental Materials, 13th ed., Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, USA, (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] G. Milewski, Strength aspects of biomechanical interaction bone-implant in dentistry (in Polish), DSc thesis, Cracow Univ. Technology Publish., Cracow, (2002).

Google Scholar

[9] L. Giachetti, et al., A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations, J Contemp Dent Pract. 7 (2006), pp.79-88.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-7-4-79

Google Scholar

[10] R.R. Braga, J.L. Ferracane, T.J. Hilton, Contraction stress of flowable composites and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers, J Am Dent Assoc 134(2003), pp.721-728.

DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0258

Google Scholar

[11] M.H. Chen, et al., Low shrinkage light curable nanocomposite for dental restorative material, Dental Materials 22 (2006), p.138 – 145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.012

Google Scholar

[12] J.R. Condon, J.L. Ferracane, Reduced polymerization stress through non-bonded nanofiller particles. Biomaterials 23(2002), pp.3807-3815.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00099-6

Google Scholar

[13] S. Uno, E. Asmussen, Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dental Research 99 (1991), pp.440-444.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1991.tb01052.x

Google Scholar

[14] G. L. Unterbrink, R. Muessner, Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems, J Dent. 23 (1995), pp.183-189.

DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)93577-o

Google Scholar

[15] B.S. Lim, J.L. Ferracane, R.L. Sakaguchi, J.R. Condon, Reduction of polymerization contraction stress for dental composites by two-step light-activation, Dental Materials 18 (2002), p.436–444.

DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00066-5

Google Scholar

[16] N. Emami, K.J.M. Söderholm, L.A. Berglund, Effect of light power density variations on bulk curing properties of dental composites, J Dent. 31 (2003), p.189 – 196.

DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00015-0

Google Scholar

[17] Ch. M. Kemp-Scholte, C. L. Davidson, Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosth Dentistry, 64 (1990), pp.658-664.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90291-j

Google Scholar

[18] Ch.M. Kemp-Scholte, C.L. Davidson, Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility, J Dental Research 69 (1990), pp.1243-1249.

DOI: 10.1177/00220345900690060301

Google Scholar

[19] R.R. Braga, J.L. Ferracane, J.R. Condon, Polymerization contraction stress in dual-cure cements and its effect on interfacial integrity of bonded inlays, J. Dent 30 (2002), pp.333-340.

DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00047-7

Google Scholar

[20] A.E. Oden, K.M.G. Andersson, Methods of making artificial tooth onlays and inlays, U.S. Patent 5, 106, 303 (1992).

Google Scholar

[21] D. Alster, A.J. Feilzer, A.J. de Gee, C.L. Davidson, Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness, Dental Materials 13(1997), p.146–59.

DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80115-7

Google Scholar

[22] J.R. Condon, J.L. Ferracane, Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress, J Am Dent Assoc 131(2000), p.497–503.

Google Scholar

[23] www. micerdent. pl/index. php.

Google Scholar