Mean Stress in Algorithms Estimating Fatigue Life of Selected Structural Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper presents comparison of the mathematical models for fatigue life calculations including influence of the mean load value. Several model based on stress analysis on the critical plane and energy density parameter were investigated. In this paper three types of materials were tested and subjected to bending, torsion and combination of bending with torsion loading with the participation of mean value of the load. It was found, that the best fatigue life estimations obtained by models taking into account changes of the material behavior under fatigue loading related to the specified numbers of cycles of the load.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 250)

Pages:

50-55

Citation:

Online since:

April 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Kluger K. Fatigue life estimation for 2017A-T4 and 6082-T6 aluminium alloys subjected to bending-torsion with mean stress. Int J Fatigue 2015; 80: 22–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.05.005

Google Scholar

[2] Kluger K, Pawliczek R. Influence of the irregularity coefficient of loading on calculated fatigue life. J Theor Appl Mech 2013; Vol. 51: 791–8.

Google Scholar

[3] Karolczuk A, Nadot Y, Dragon A. Non-local stress gradient approach for multiaxial fatigue of defective material. Comput Mater Sci 2008; 44: 464–75.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.04.005

Google Scholar

[4] Gerber W. Bestimmung der zulossigne Spannungen in eisen Constructionen. ZBayer Arch Ing Ver 1974; Vol. 6.

Google Scholar

[5] Findley WN. A theory for the effect of mean stress on fatigue of metals under combined torsion and axial load or bending. J Eng Ind 1959; Nov.: 301–6.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4008327

Google Scholar

[6] Dang Van K, Cailletaud G, Flavenot JF, Le Douaron A, Lieurade HP. Criterion for high cycle fatigue failure under multiaxial loading. Mech Eng Publ Lond 1989: 459–78.

Google Scholar

[7] Carpinteri A, Spagnoli A, Vantadori S, Bagni C. Structural integrity assessment of metallic components under multiaxial fatigue: the C-S criterion and its evolution. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2013; 36: 870–83.

DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12037

Google Scholar

[8] Smith KN, Watson P, Topper T. Stress-strain function for fatigue of metals. J Mater 1970; 5: 767–78.

Google Scholar

[9] Szala G, Ligaj B. Dwuparametryczne charakterystyki zmęczeniowe stali konstrukcyjnych i ich eks-perymentalna weryfikacja. Zbiór Monogr Red J Szala Wydaw Nauk ITE (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] Gasiak G, Pawliczek R. Application of an energetic model for fatigue life prediction of the construction steels under bending, torsion and synchronous bending and torsion. Int J Fatigue 2003; Vol. 25: 1339–46.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(03)00055-0

Google Scholar

[11] Socie DF. Critical plane approaches for multiaxial fatigue damage assessment. Am Soc Test Mater 1993; ASTM STP 1191: 7–36.

DOI: 10.1520/stp24793s

Google Scholar

[12] Karolczuk A, Kluger K. Analysis of the coefficient of normal stress effect in chosen multiaxial fatigue criteria. Theor Appl Fract Mech 2014; 73: 39–47.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.07.015

Google Scholar

[13] Pawliczek R. Influence of the mean load value in fatigue block loading on strains. Key Eng Mater 2014; Vol. 598: 195–200.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.598.195

Google Scholar

[14] Socie DF. Multiaxial fatigue damage models. ASME J Engin Mat Techn 1987; 109: 292–8.

Google Scholar

[15] Niesłony A, Łagoda T, Walat K, Kurek M. Multiaxial fatigue behaviour of AA6068 and AA2017A aluminium alloys under in-phase bending with torsion loading condition. Mater Werkst 2014; 45: 947–52.

DOI: 10.1002/mawe.201400214

Google Scholar

[16] Gasiak G, Pawliczek R. Calculation of fatigue life of specimens made of 18G2A steel under bending and torsional loading with different stress ratios. Materials Engineering 2002; Vol. 9, No 4: 31-40.

Google Scholar