Deformation and Fracture of Metallic Nanowires

Article Preview

Abstract:

A many-body interatomic potential for metallic nanowires within the second-moment approximation of the tight-binding model (the Cleri-Rosato potential) was employed to carry out three dimensional molecular dynamics simulations. Molecular dynamics simulation results for metallic nanowires at various temperature are presented. The stress–time and stress length curves for nanowires are simulated. The breaking and yield stress of nanowires are dependent on the Volume and temperature. The necking, Plastic deformation, slipping domain, twins, clusters, microspores and break-up phenomena of nanowire are demonstrated. Stress decreases with increasing nanowire volume and temperature. The final breaking position occurs at the central part of the nanowire when it is short, as the nanowire length increases the breaking position gradually shifts to the ends.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 258)

Pages:

277-280

Citation:

Online since:

December 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Gang Feng, William D. Nix, Youngki Yoon, Cheol Jin Lee / J. Appl. Phys. 99, (2006)074304.

Google Scholar

[2] Z. L. Wang, Z. R. Dai, R. P. Gao, Z. G. Bai, J. L. Gole / applied physics letters, volume 77 (2000)21.

Google Scholar

[3] M.D. Starostenkov, M.M. Aish / Materials Physics and Mechanics 21(1) (2014) 1.

Google Scholar

[4] M.D. Starostenkov, M.M. Aish / Advanced Materials Research 1013 (2014) 242-248.

Google Scholar

[5] M.D. Starostenkov, M.M. Aish, A.A. Sitnikov, S.A. Kotrechko / Letters on Materials 3 (3), (2013) 180.

Google Scholar

[6] M.M. Aish, M.D. Starostenkov / Materials Physics and Mechanics 24 (2015) 139-144.

Google Scholar

[7] M.M. Aish, M.D. Starostenkov / Materials Physics and Mechanics 18(1) (2013) 53.

Google Scholar

[8] F. Cleri and V. Rosato, Phys. Rev. B 48, 22 (1993).

Google Scholar

[9] E. F. Rexer, J. Jellinek, E. B. Krissinel, and E. K. Parks, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 82 (2002).

Google Scholar

[10] S. Darby, T. V. Mortimer-Jones, R. L. Johnston, and C. Roberts, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 1536 (2002).

Google Scholar

[11] K. Michaelian, M. R. Beltran, and I. L. Garzon, Phys. Rev. B 65, 041403(R) (2002).

Google Scholar