Study of the Influence of the Opening Size and the Type of Reinforcement on the Behavior of the Reinforced Concrete Infill Shear Walls

Article Preview

Abstract:

The subject of the article is a comparison of behavior of a precast reinforced concrete infill shear walls with an opening with different types of reinforcement. These are the walls that can ensure stiffness of the frame structure against horizontal load. Studied walls with an opening represent cases of how the wall can be reinforced prior to the implementation of an additional opening. The influence of the so called “sleeping reinforcement” is studied. This is a reinforcement that would take effect only after the additional opening has been made. The wall elements are first subjected to experimental verification. Subsequently, the results from the experiments are verified by non-linear models, which represent the individual elements during the experiment. Based on these models, a parametric study is performed, where the influence of an opening size in these infill shear walls is studied on their load - bearing capacity and stiffness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 336)

Pages:

209-215

Citation:

Online since:

August 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] ČSN EN 1992-1-1 ed. 2: Eurocode 2: Design of the concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Praha: ÚNMZ, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] CEB-FIP Model Code 1990: Design Code, 1993. London: T. Telford. ISBN 0727716964.

Google Scholar

[3] ŠIMEK, Ondřej a Miloš ZICH. Load Carrying Capacity of the Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls with an Opening, JUNIORSTAV 2021. Brno, 2021, s. 207-211. ISBN 978-80-86433-75-2.

Google Scholar

[4] POLYAKOV, S. V. Masonry in framed buildings. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe isdatel'stvo Literatury pro stroitel'stvu i arckhitecture, 1956. ISBN 978-0853500803.

Google Scholar

[5] STAFFORD SMITH, B a C CARTER. A METHOD OF ANALYSIS FOR INFILLED FRAMES. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers [online]. 1969, 44(1), 31-48 [cit. 2021-5-5]. ISSN 1753-7789. Available at:.

DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1969.7290

Google Scholar

[6] MAINSTONE, RJ. ON THE STIFFNESS AND STRENGTHS OF INFILLED FRAMES. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers [online]. 1971, 49(2) [cit. 2021-5-12]. ISSN 1753-7789. Available at:.

DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1971.6267

Google Scholar

[7] MONDAL, Goutam a Sudhir K. JAIN. Lateral Stiffness of Masonry Infilled Reinforced Concrete (RC) Frames with Central Opening. Earthquake Spectra [online]. 2008, 24(3), 701-723 [cit. 2021-5-12]. ISSN 8755-2930. Available at:.

DOI: 10.1193/1.2942376

Google Scholar

[8] G. ASTERIS, Panagiotis, Ioannis P. GIANNOPOULOS a Christis Z. CHRYSOSTOMOU. Modeling of Infilled Frames with Openings. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal [online]. 2012, 6(1), 81-91 [cit. 2021-5-12]. ISSN 18748368. Available at:.

DOI: 10.2174/1874836801206010081

Google Scholar

[9] ELLIOTT, Kim S. a Colin K. JOLLY. Multi-storey precast concrete framed structures. [Second edition]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. ISBN 978-1-4051-0614-6.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118587379

Google Scholar

[10] ČERVENKA, Vladimír, Libor JENDELE a Jan ČERVENKA. ATENA Program Documentation: Part 1 – Theory [online]. [cit. 2021-05-17]. Available at: https://www.cervenka.cz/assets/files/atena-pdf/ATENA_Theory.pdf.

Google Scholar