Sort by:
Publication Type:
Open access:
Publication Date:
Periodicals:
Search results
Online since: July 2013
Authors: Rajesh J. Tayade, Kunal B. Modi, T.K. Pathak, N.H. Vasoya, Thillai Sivakumar Natarajan
Table 1.
References [1] R.
Nano Tech. 2011 (2011) 1-6
Borse, Synthasis of solar active nano crystalline ferrite, MFe2O4 (M; Ca, Zn, Mg ) photo catalyst by microwave irradiation, Solid State Commun. 151 (2011) 470-479
Tech., 87 (2012) 1-14
References [1] R.
Nano Tech. 2011 (2011) 1-6
Borse, Synthasis of solar active nano crystalline ferrite, MFe2O4 (M; Ca, Zn, Mg ) photo catalyst by microwave irradiation, Solid State Commun. 151 (2011) 470-479
Tech., 87 (2012) 1-14
Online since: May 2020
Authors: Mohamed Youssfi, Yousra Melhaoui, Abdelali Kamil, Khalifa Mansouri, Abdelmoula Ait Allal
Fig. 1.
Root nodes marginal probability distribution Root nodes state Root nodes’ MPDs P(Pp) P(Dr) P(Cl) P(Fl) P(Pi) P(Vv) P(Cp) P(Ss) P(Co) 1 1−𝑒−𝜆Pp𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Dr𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Cl𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Fl𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Pi𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Vv𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Cp𝑡 1 − 𝑒−𝜆Ss𝑡 1 − 𝑒−𝜆Co𝑡 2 𝑒−𝜆Pp𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Dr𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Cl𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Fl𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Pi𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Vv𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Cp𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Ss𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Co𝑡 Table 5.
Conditional Probability Distributions (CPDs) for the node AF Root nodes state Root nodes’ CPDs Co Fl Vv P(AF=1| Co, Fl, Vv) 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 0 Probabilistic inference.
References [1] European Maritime Safety Agency(EMSA).
Procedia, vol. 50, pp. 473–479, 2013
Root nodes marginal probability distribution Root nodes state Root nodes’ MPDs P(Pp) P(Dr) P(Cl) P(Fl) P(Pi) P(Vv) P(Cp) P(Ss) P(Co) 1 1−𝑒−𝜆Pp𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Dr𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Cl𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Fl𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Pi𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Vv𝑡 1−𝑒−𝜆Cp𝑡 1 − 𝑒−𝜆Ss𝑡 1 − 𝑒−𝜆Co𝑡 2 𝑒−𝜆Pp𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Dr𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Cl𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Fl𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Pi𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Vv𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Cp𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Ss𝑡 𝑒−𝜆Co𝑡 Table 5.
Conditional Probability Distributions (CPDs) for the node AF Root nodes state Root nodes’ CPDs Co Fl Vv P(AF=1| Co, Fl, Vv) 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 0 Probabilistic inference.
References [1] European Maritime Safety Agency(EMSA).
Procedia, vol. 50, pp. 473–479, 2013
Online since: January 2020
Authors: A.G. Barbosa de Lima, Thayze Rodrigues Bezerra Pessoa, Pierre Correa Martins, V. Campos Pereira, A. Silva do Carmo, E. da Silva
References
[1] G.V.
Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável. 6 (1) (2011) 1-7.
E.J.A.S.T.1 (1)(2010) 1–15
Food Eng. 87 (4)(2008) 479–484
Pres. 41 (3) (2017) 1-16
Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável. 6 (1) (2011) 1-7.
E.J.A.S.T.1 (1)(2010) 1–15
Food Eng. 87 (4)(2008) 479–484
Pres. 41 (3) (2017) 1-16
Online since: March 2023
Authors: El Mostafa Jalal, Abdellatif Hasnaoui, Hasnae Saadi, Nabil Hachem, Mohamed Madani, Mohammed El Bouziani, Amer Lafhal
Fig. 1 A transverse section of a cubic nanowire consisting of mixed spins: S=1 (Blue circles) and σ=2 (Brown circles).
In the following, KB=1 for simplicity. 3.
References [1] B.
Dev. 52 (2008) 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.524.0465
Badarneh, Compensation and critical behavior of Ising mixed spin (1-1/2-1) three layers system of cubic structure, Phys.
In the following, KB=1 for simplicity. 3.
References [1] B.
Dev. 52 (2008) 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.524.0465
Badarneh, Compensation and critical behavior of Ising mixed spin (1-1/2-1) three layers system of cubic structure, Phys.
Online since: July 2014
Authors: R.H. Biswas
Improving the accuracy and precision
3.1.1.
Application of luminescence to planetary sciences 5.1 Meteorite 5.1.1 Terrestrial age 5.1.2 Cosmic ray exposure age 5.1.3 Thermal metamorphism history 5.1.4 Meteoroid orbit 5.2 Mars References 1.
Improving the accuracy and precision 3.1.1.
Quaternary Geochronology 6 (2011) 468-479
Radiation Measurements 32 (2000) 479-485
Application of luminescence to planetary sciences 5.1 Meteorite 5.1.1 Terrestrial age 5.1.2 Cosmic ray exposure age 5.1.3 Thermal metamorphism history 5.1.4 Meteoroid orbit 5.2 Mars References 1.
Improving the accuracy and precision 3.1.1.
Quaternary Geochronology 6 (2011) 468-479
Radiation Measurements 32 (2000) 479-485
Online since: October 2024
Authors: Alwiyah Nurhayati, Kasarapu Venkataramana, C. Vishnuvardhan Reddy
Fig. 1. represents powder x-ray diffractograms for all materials.
The evaluated structure parameters are listed in Table 1.
References [1] J.
Alloys Compd., vol. 490, no. 1–2, pp. 472–479, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.048
Technol., vol. 1, pp. 26–35, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.susmat.2014.11.002
The evaluated structure parameters are listed in Table 1.
References [1] J.
Alloys Compd., vol. 490, no. 1–2, pp. 472–479, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.048
Technol., vol. 1, pp. 26–35, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.susmat.2014.11.002
Online since: March 2016
Authors: Jiang Li Ning, Yun Li Feng, Jie Li
Literatures
Corrected ky
parameters
using Eq. (3)
and Eq. (24)
Samples
H-P predictions
(∆σHP)
Predicted yield stresses
(∆σHP
+ ∆σOA)
Difference between measured LYS
and
(∆σHP
+ ∆σOA)
Morrison [18]
20.7
20.5
21.0
20.3
21.0
20.7
21.0
20.7
S1-1
S2-1
S1-2
S2-2
S1-4
S2-4
S1-8
S2-8
639
569
640
513
573
508
558
479
670
598
664
538
601
538
591
514
31
-6
23
42
50
23
35
30
Gurland
&
Anand
[2, 17]
22.4 / 20.1
22.2 / 19.9
22.7 / 20.4
22.0 / 19.8
22.8 / 20.4
22.4 / 20.1
22.7 / 20.4
22.5 / 20.2
S1-1
S2-1
S1-2
S2-2
S1-4
S2-4
S1-8
S2-8
691 / 614
614 / 545
690 / 614
555 / 493
620 / 549
548 / 486
602 / 535
519 / 460
722 / 645
643 / 574
714 / 638
579 / 518
648 / 577
578 / 516
635 / 568
554 / 495
-21 / 56
-51 / 18
-27 / 49
1 / 62
2 / 73
-17 / 45
-9 / 58
-10 / 49
Pickering
[19, 20];
Iza-
Mendia & Gutiérrez [22]
19.9
19.7
20.1
19.5
20.2
19.9
20.1
19.9
S1-1
S2-1
S1-2
S2-2
S1-4
S2-4
S1-8
S2-8
647
579
References [1] L.
Sci. 24(1) (1989) 281-287
A 441 (2006) 1-17
Trans. 1 (1970) 1161-1167
References [1] L.
Sci. 24(1) (1989) 281-287
A 441 (2006) 1-17
Trans. 1 (1970) 1161-1167
Online since: March 2023
Authors: R. Sudhakaran, P.S. Sivasakthivel, K.M. Eazhil, S. Narayanan, B. Balamurali
Fig. 1.
The ranges of the process parameters are shown in Table 1 Table 1.
Central Composite Rotatable Design and Experimental Values Specimen No Process Variables (Welding Parameters) Observed value of α (degrees) Predicted value of α (degrees) % error Welding current, I Welding speed, V Plate length, L Welding gun angle, θ Shielding gas flow rate, Q 01 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 3.55 3.494 1.602748 02 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 8.85 8.86 -0.11287 03 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 3.35 3.266 2.571953 04 1 1 -1 -1 1 3.22 3.028 6.340819 05 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 7.88 7.96 -1.00503 06 1 -1 1 -1 1 5.83 5.954 -2.08263 07 -1 1 1 -1 1 3.51 3.392 3.478774 08 1 1 1 -1 -1 5.68 5.774 -1.62799 09 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 5.88 6.042 -2.68123 10 1 -1 -1 1 1 4.55 4.48 1.5625 11 -1 1 -1 1 1 5.32 5.282 0.719424 12 1 1 -1 1 -1 7.32 7.22 1.385042 13 -1 -1 1 1 1 6.15 6.188 -0.61409 14 1 -1 1 1 -1 6.32 6.446 -1.9547 15 -1 1 1 1 -1 4.97 4.976 -0.12058 16 1 1 1 1 1 9.92 9.846 0.751574 17 -2 0 0 0 0 6.38 6.379 0.015676 18 2 0 0 0 0 9.1 9.131 -0.3395 19 0 -2 0 0 0 5.51 5.297 4.021144 20 0 2 0 0 0 3.39 3.637 -6.79131 21 0 0 -2 0 0 5.08 5.255
The results led to the following conclusions. 1.
Process. 813 (2015) 474 – 479
The ranges of the process parameters are shown in Table 1 Table 1.
Central Composite Rotatable Design and Experimental Values Specimen No Process Variables (Welding Parameters) Observed value of α (degrees) Predicted value of α (degrees) % error Welding current, I Welding speed, V Plate length, L Welding gun angle, θ Shielding gas flow rate, Q 01 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 3.55 3.494 1.602748 02 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 8.85 8.86 -0.11287 03 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 3.35 3.266 2.571953 04 1 1 -1 -1 1 3.22 3.028 6.340819 05 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 7.88 7.96 -1.00503 06 1 -1 1 -1 1 5.83 5.954 -2.08263 07 -1 1 1 -1 1 3.51 3.392 3.478774 08 1 1 1 -1 -1 5.68 5.774 -1.62799 09 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 5.88 6.042 -2.68123 10 1 -1 -1 1 1 4.55 4.48 1.5625 11 -1 1 -1 1 1 5.32 5.282 0.719424 12 1 1 -1 1 -1 7.32 7.22 1.385042 13 -1 -1 1 1 1 6.15 6.188 -0.61409 14 1 -1 1 1 -1 6.32 6.446 -1.9547 15 -1 1 1 1 -1 4.97 4.976 -0.12058 16 1 1 1 1 1 9.92 9.846 0.751574 17 -2 0 0 0 0 6.38 6.379 0.015676 18 2 0 0 0 0 9.1 9.131 -0.3395 19 0 -2 0 0 0 5.51 5.297 4.021144 20 0 2 0 0 0 3.39 3.637 -6.79131 21 0 0 -2 0 0 5.08 5.255
The results led to the following conclusions. 1.
Process. 813 (2015) 474 – 479