Search results

In order to investigate the effects of infilled walls with different configurations on the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete frame structures, the structural periods, the ratio of to and the maximum interstorey drifts were analyzed.
The structural natural period is reduced to consider the impact of stiffness of infilled walls on the seismic behavior of structures.
Taking the structural periods and interstorey drifts as index, the impacts of the infilled wall and its configuration on the seismic behavior of frame structures are studied by comparing with the bare frame structure and can be helpful in practical engineering applications.
The location and geometric parameters of the three-strut are calculated from the contact length among braces, beams and columns, the area of brace.
The three-strut model is used to capture the mechanical behavior of infilled walls[4,5].

The structure is laterally braced by pairs of chevron braced frames acting in both orthogonal directions.
It includes one braced frame with a leaning column representing the gravity columns laterally stabilized by the braced frame, i.e. half of the gravity columns of the building.
The same element was used for the braced frame columns as well as the gravity columns included in Model B.
They are therefore expected to improve the seismic robustness of low-ductility steel braced frames by mitigating P-delta effects and ensure minimum reserve lateral capacity in case of failure of primary SFRS components.
Tufts University, Medford, MA, 2014 [13] Sizemore, JG, Inelastic Behavior and Seismic Collapse Prevention Performance of Low-Ductility Steel Braced Frames, PhD Dissertation, Graduate College, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 2017

This paper presents an analysis on the seismic behavior of buckling-restrained brace frames (BRBFs) with different rigidity ratios by the finite element analysis software ANSYS.
Working principle of BRBs Composition and hysteretic behavior of BRBs.
Fig1 Axial force-displacement of brace Fig2 lateral stiffness contribution from BRBs Structure model and Rigidity ratio R Model structure is a 10-story plane brace frame.
Finally, the buckling restrained braces stiffness Kb is determined according to BRBs and frame rigidity ratio R= Kb /Kf, and the brace sections are calculated by Eq1.
Table1 Frame section and the lateral stiffness of each story Story Column [mm] Beam[mm] Beam-column stiffness ratio Stiffness correction coefficient Story stiffness [N/cm] 1 H500X400X15X20 H400X300X10X15 Exterior Column 0.2401 Exterior Column 0.3304 584771 Interior Column 0.4802 Interior Column 0.3952 2~5 H500X400X15X20 H400X300X10X15 Exterior Column 0.2401 Exterior Column 0.1072 242411 Interior Column 0.4802 Interior Column 0.1936 6~10 H400X350X12X18 H400X300X10X15 Exterior Column 0.4840 Exterior Column 0.1948 208288 Interior Column 0.9679 Interior Column 0.3261 Dynamic response analysis results of structural systems Input seismic load. when elastic-plastic time-history analysis, characteristics of seismic wave spectrum should be close to characteristic period of construction site , seismic wave duration should not be less 5 ~ 10 times than the fundamental natural period of structures, and should not be less than 12s, 0.01s or 0.02s is time-distance of seismic wave. 6 Types of II site

It is highlighted that in the examined case the masonry infills determine a worsening of the seismic behavior of the existing structure.
This is suggested by the obvious benefit that the structure would receive if one avoids that the structural frame interacts with the panels which determine a worsening of the post-seismic behavior of the building.
Fig. 12: Retrofitting of RC building with steel braced frame.
It can be stated that, in the post-buckling phase, the behavior of the braced structure is near to a scheme in which only extended diagonals are active.
Fig. 14: Typical non-linear behavior of the steel brace in tension and in compression.

So it is necessary to quantitative analyze various factors on the stiffness effect and the distribution of internal force of filler wall frame structure and make references to the seismic design of this structure.
Organization of the Text Filler Wall Frame Structure Stiffness Effect Analysis.
Stiffness Effect Analysis Of Filler Wall Frame Structure.
Floor slab and infilled wall effect on seismic performance of RC frame structure[D].
Behavior of Square Infilled Frames.

Moment frames and braced frames usually constitute the lateral force resisting system in steel structures in seismic regions.
However, conventional braces experiment asymmetric hysteretic behavior and degradation of strength and stiffness once buckling occurs.
The structure will use buckling-restrained braced frames as part of the structural system to resist seismic actions.
It has a lateral force resisting system comprised of a combination of concentrically braced frames (CBFs) and buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs).
In this stage, the BRBs and other structural members were modeled as frames elements with linear elastic behavior.

A Buckling-restrained braced frame (BRBF) for seismic resistance has been increasingly used in recent years.
The behavior of the brace under compression is similar to that under tension.
Seismic Responses of Braced Frames with BRBs and SCBs Six Braced Frames The time history analyses focused on evaluating the effects of BRBs and SCBs on the seismic performance of braced frames.
This behavior can be overcome by using the SCB to provide restoring forces to the frames.
Compressive behavior of dual-gusset-plate connections for buckling-restrained braced frames.

Design of Interior Joints Strength of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame of Reinforced Concrete Xiangrong Chen 1, a, Huawei Liu1, b 1School of Civil Engineering, Xian University of Architecture and Technology, Xian 710055, China acxr90@126.com,bliuhuawei211@163.com Keywords: Reinforced concrete, Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame, Design of joints Abstract.
The performance of buckling-restrained brace and the stress mechanism of interior joints in RC frame are both briefly introduced,based on which interior joints strength of buckling-restrained braced frame of reinforced concrete is studied，and contributions to the shear strength of the joint made by brace is therefore summarized.
The brace is a perfect structure seismic component, which can not only provide great stiffness and bearing capacity but also protect major structure by releasing seismic energy by means of yielding steel [1].
(Figure 2).In this model, part of the force will be transferred into the joint by means of shear flow by bonding effect, when rebar of beams and columns which transfix the joint are under combined effect of tension and compression.
The relative storey displacement of braced frame should be checked under the small seism and wind load or under great earthquake to meet the standard.

Such devices allow a significant improvement of the seismic behavior of the building.
Fig. 9: Behavior of conventional brace (left) and buckling restrained brace (right).
Buckled out unsatisfying nonlinear behaviour Unbuckled satisfying nonlinear behaviour Fig. 10: Behavior of conventional brace and buckling restrained brace (Deulkar, Modhera and Patil [20]).
[12] Di Sarno, L., Manfredi, G., Experimental tests on full scale RC frames retrofitted with buckling restrained braces, Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, STESSA 2009, Edited by Richard Sause, Federico M.
[16] Uang, C-M., Nakashima, M., Steel buckling-restrained braced frames, Chapter 16, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, (2004)

The main problem in EC8 gives a constant value for q-factor, since change in structural characteristics of building change in behaviour of braced steel structures and that affects on q-factor, since change in structural characteristics of building change in behaviour of braced steel structures and that affects on q-factor.
However, change in structural characteristics of building change in behaviour of braced steel structures and that affects on q-factor.
They studied braced steel structures having rigid and semi-rigid beam-column connections.
Fig. 6 Behaviour factor of the studied frames Brace Slenderness Ratio Effect on q-factor.
Akbari, Seismic behavior factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings, Engineering Structures. 25(2003), pp. 1505–1513