[1]
EN 1998-1-1, Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, (2005).
DOI: 10.1002/9783433609194.ch3
Google Scholar
[2]
UBC (Uniform Building Code), Vol. 2: Structural engineering design provisions. Whittier, California, (1997).
Google Scholar
[3]
M. Ferraioli, A. Lavino, A. Mandara, Behaviour Factor of Code-Designed Steel Moment-Resisting Frames, International Journal of Steel Structures. 14 (2014), p.243–254.
DOI: 10.1007/s13296-014-2005-1
Google Scholar
[4]
EN 1993-1-1, Design of steel structures-Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, (2005).
Google Scholar
[5]
T. Balendra, X. Huang, Overstrength and Ductility Factors for Steel Frames Designed According to BS 5950, Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE. 129 (2003), p.1019–1035.
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1019)
Google Scholar
[6]
M. R. Maheri, R. Akbari, Seismic behavior factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings, Engineering Structures. 25(2003), p.1505–1513.
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(03)00117-2
Google Scholar
[7]
J. Kim, H. Choi, Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames, Engineering Structures. 27 (2005), pp.285-300.
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.009
Google Scholar
[8]
M. Mahmoudi, M. Zaree, Evaluating response modification factors of concentrically braced steel frames, Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 66 (2010), pp.1196-1204.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.004
Google Scholar
[9]
B. Faggiano, L. Fiorino, A. Formisano, V. Macillo, C. Castaldo, F. M. Mazzolani, Assessment of the Design Provisions for Steel Concentric X Bracing Frames with Reference to Italian and European Codes, The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal. 8 (2014).
DOI: 10.2174/1874836801408010208
Google Scholar
[10]
F. M. Mazzolani, V. Piluso, Theory and Design of Seismic Resistant Steel Frames, E & FN Spon, An imprint of Chapman & Hall, London, (1996).
DOI: 10.4324/9780203474686
Google Scholar
[11]
ATC-34, A critical review of current approaches to earthquake-resistant design, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, (1995).
Google Scholar
[12]
A. Y. Elghazouli, Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 8 (2010), pp.65-89.
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6
Google Scholar
[13]
A. Nassar, H. Krawinkler, Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems, Report No. 95, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, California, USA, (1991).
Google Scholar
[14]
P. Fajfar, A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design, Earthquake Spectra. 16 (2000), p.573–592.
DOI: 10.1193/1.1586128
Google Scholar
[15]
M. Mahmoudi, M. Zaree, Determination the response modification factors of buckling restrained braced frames, Procedia Engineering. 54 (2013), pp.222-231.
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.020
Google Scholar
[16]
G. S. Kamaris, Y. M. Vallianatou, D. E. Beskos, Seismic damage estimation of in-plane regular steel moment resisting and x-braced frames, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 10 (2012), pp.1745-1766.
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9387-2
Google Scholar
[17]
SAP2000, Linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of three-dimensional structures, Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI), Berkeley (CA), (2010).
Google Scholar
[18]
FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, (2000).
Google Scholar