Evaluating the Behaviour Factor of Concentric X-Braced Steel Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The behaviour factor (q-factor) is a factor introduced in Eurocode-8 (EC8) to reduce the seismic elastic forces of structures obtained from an elastic analysis accounting for their ductility and overstrength. Seismic codes, especially the EC8, gives a constant value for q-factor, since change in structural characteristics of building change in behaviour of braced steel structures and that affects on q-factor. In this paper, the q-factor is evaluated for X-braced steel structures using pushover analysis. The effects of brace slenderness ratio and stories number are investigated. The results of this study indicate that the most important parameter that affects the q-factor is the brace slenderness ratio. Furthermore, the EC8 recommends a higher than actual value of q-factor, which is potentially unsafe.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

98-105

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] EN 1998-1-1, Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, (2005).

DOI: 10.1002/9783433609194.ch3

Google Scholar

[2] UBC (Uniform Building Code), Vol. 2: Structural engineering design provisions. Whittier, California, (1997).

Google Scholar

[3] M. Ferraioli, A. Lavino, A. Mandara, Behaviour Factor of Code-Designed Steel Moment-Resisting Frames, International Journal of Steel Structures. 14 (2014), p.243–254.

DOI: 10.1007/s13296-014-2005-1

Google Scholar

[4] EN 1993-1-1, Design of steel structures-Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] T. Balendra, X. Huang, Overstrength and Ductility Factors for Steel Frames Designed According to BS 5950, Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE. 129 (2003), p.1019–1035.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1019)

Google Scholar

[6] M. R. Maheri, R. Akbari, Seismic behavior factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings, Engineering Structures. 25(2003), p.1505–1513.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(03)00117-2

Google Scholar

[7] J. Kim, H. Choi, Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames, Engineering Structures. 27 (2005), pp.285-300.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.009

Google Scholar

[8] M. Mahmoudi, M. Zaree, Evaluating response modification factors of concentrically braced steel frames, Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 66 (2010), pp.1196-1204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.004

Google Scholar

[9] B. Faggiano, L. Fiorino, A. Formisano, V. Macillo, C. Castaldo, F. M. Mazzolani, Assessment of the Design Provisions for Steel Concentric X Bracing Frames with Reference to Italian and European Codes, The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal. 8 (2014).

DOI: 10.2174/1874836801408010208

Google Scholar

[10] F. M. Mazzolani, V. Piluso, Theory and Design of Seismic Resistant Steel Frames, E & FN Spon, An imprint of Chapman & Hall, London, (1996).

DOI: 10.4324/9780203474686

Google Scholar

[11] ATC-34, A critical review of current approaches to earthquake-resistant design, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, (1995).

Google Scholar

[12] A. Y. Elghazouli, Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 8 (2010), pp.65-89.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-009-9125-6

Google Scholar

[13] A. Nassar, H. Krawinkler, Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems, Report No. 95, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, California, USA, (1991).

Google Scholar

[14] P. Fajfar, A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design, Earthquake Spectra. 16 (2000), p.573–592.

DOI: 10.1193/1.1586128

Google Scholar

[15] M. Mahmoudi, M. Zaree, Determination the response modification factors of buckling restrained braced frames, Procedia Engineering. 54 (2013), pp.222-231.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.020

Google Scholar

[16] G. S. Kamaris, Y. M. Vallianatou, D. E. Beskos, Seismic damage estimation of in-plane regular steel moment resisting and x-braced frames, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 10 (2012), pp.1745-1766.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9387-2

Google Scholar

[17] SAP2000, Linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of three-dimensional structures, Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI), Berkeley (CA), (2010).

Google Scholar

[18] FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, (2000).

Google Scholar