Seismic Behavior Investigation of Prefabricated Steel Industrial Buildings

Article Preview

Abstract:

Prefabricated steel industrial buildings are designed with design standards against to earthquake loads. Several lateral systems are used to increase the strength of steel industrial buildings against earthquake loads. Most commonly used systems are braced frame systems. In the braced frame systems, the most important problem is the buckling of these members under compression loads. Currently, the cost for buckling restrained braced frame systems are too high. For steel industrial buildings, the buildings` cost are calculated by considering unit weight of steel. The main cost of the building is based on manufacturing of steel and erection of the building. On the other hand, masonry infilled wall systems are preferred to protect the inside. Masonry infill walls are the structural members resisting to compression loads. Masonry infill walls are commonly rigid systems on contrary to braced frame systems since the masonry infill walls are constructed during the both axes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the seismic behavior of prefabricated steel industrial buildings. These industrial buildings were considered in various combinations as bare, with tension strand systems as braced frame members and masonry infill walls which are used to resist lateral forces. Behavior of tension strand systems used as lateral resistance in prefabricated steel buildings comparing to bare and infill walled ones have been investigated. In the models with tension strand systems, various diameters and pretension loads were used for investigation of various cases of structural system.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

131-138

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Akcali, I. and Deniz A, (2002) Mechanism Methodology, Birsen Press, Istanbul, Turkey, 249.

Google Scholar

[2] Emmerich, D.G., (1990) Self-Tensioning Spherical Structures, International Journal of Space Structures Vol: 5, No: 3 and 4.

Google Scholar

[3] Emmerich, D.G., (1996) Emmerich on Self-Tensioning Structures International Journal of Space Structures Vol: 11.

DOI: 10.1177/026635119601-205

Google Scholar

[4] Burkhardt, R.W., (2008) A Practical Guide to Tensegrity Design, 2nd edition.

Google Scholar

[5] Furuya, H., (1992). Concept of Deployable Temsegrity Structures in Space Application Internatinal Journal of Space Structures Vol: 7.

Google Scholar

[6] Grip, R., (1992). The Correspondence Between Convex Polyhedra and Tensegrity Systems: A classification Systems, Internatinal Journal of Space Structures Vol: 7, (1992).

DOI: 10.1177/026635119200700205

Google Scholar

[7] Gómez Jàuregui, Valentín (2004). Tensegrity Stuctures and their application to Architecture", MSc thesis. Queen, s University, Belfast, Spain.

Google Scholar

[8] Hanaor, A., (1992) Aspects of Design of Double-Layer Tensegrity Domes", Internatinal Journal of Space Structures Vol: 7.

DOI: 10.1177/026635119200700204

Google Scholar

[9] Hangai, Y., (1992) Self-Equilibrated Stress Systems and Structural Behavior of Truss Structures Stabilized by Cable Tension, Internatinal Journal of Space Structures Vol: 7.

DOI: 10.1177/026635119200700203

Google Scholar

[10] Boeck, J.D., (2013) Tensegrity Bridges, Master Thesis, 2013, Delft University of Technology.

Google Scholar

[11] Sadao, S., (1996). Fuller on Tensegrity", Internatinal Journal of Space Structures V: 11, No: 1-2.

Google Scholar

[12] Chassagnoux, A., (1992) A Study of Morphological Characteristics of Tensegrity Structures", Internal Journal of Space Structures Vol. 7 No: 2.

Google Scholar

[13] Coloney, R., (1992) The Stability of Tensegrity Frameworks, International Journal of Space Structures Vol: 7, (1992).

Google Scholar

[14] Fu, F., (2005). Structural behavior and design methods of Tensegrity domes, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 61, 23-35.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.06.004

Google Scholar

[15] Fu, F., and Lan, T., (2002). A study of Tensegrity Cable Domes, Space Structures 5, Telford.

Google Scholar

[16] Juan S.H., Tur J.M.M., (2007). Tensegrity frameworks: Static analysis review, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 23 June (2007).

Google Scholar

[17] Krishna, P., (2001). Tension roofs and bridges, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 57.

Google Scholar

[18] Motro, R., and Raducanu, V. (2003). Tensegrity systems., International Journal Space Structures, 18, 77–84.

DOI: 10.1260/026635103769518198

Google Scholar

[19] Motro R., (1990) Tensegrity Systems and Geodesic Domes, Internatinal Journal of Space Structures Vol: 5.

Google Scholar

[20] Pena D. M., Lorens I., Sastre R., (2010). Application of the Tensegrity Principles on Tensile Textile Constructions, 05-02-(2010).

Google Scholar

[21] Rebielak, J., (2002). General Morphology of New Types of Tension-Strut Systems", Head of Division of Structures and Building Engineering, Department of Architecture, Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland.

Google Scholar

[22] Saidani, M and Remise, E., (1996) Research on Double Layer Tensegrity Systems.

Google Scholar

[23] Stern, I. P., (1999) Development of Design Equations for Self-Deployable N-Strut Tensegrity Systems, Master Thesis, 1999, University of Florida.

Google Scholar

[24] Turkish Standard TS-498, (2005). Design loads for buildings.

Google Scholar

[25] PEER, 2017 (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center) website (http: /peer. berkeley. edu).

Google Scholar