Effect of Column Base Flexibility on Earthquake-Induced Residual Deformations of Steel Columns

Article Preview

Abstract:

Post-earthquake residual deformations often control decisions regarding potential demolition of earthquake-damaged buildings. While residual deformations are typically assumed to be lateral, the column residual axial shortening has similar implications for such decisions. This paper investigates the effect of column base flexibility on residual axial shortening of columns in steel moment resisting frames (MRFs). The mechanistic reason for this dependency is that higher base flexibility reduces plastic rotation demands in the column, in turn mitigating local buckling-induced shortening. To investigate this issue, parametric finite element (FE) simulations interrogate various column sizes used in conventional mid-to high-rise steel MRFs. The simulations suggest at 1-2% story drifts, the base flexibility virtually eliminates the column axial shortening.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

149-156

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. -H. Hwang and D. G. Lignos, Earthquake-induced loss assessment of steel frame buildings with special moment frames designed in highly seismic regions, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., (2017).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2898

Google Scholar

[2] A. Elkady and D. G. Lignos, Analytical investigation of the cyclic behavior and plastic hinge formation in deep wide-flange steel beam-columns, Bull. Earthq. Eng., vol. 13, no. 4, p.1097–1118, (2015).

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-014-9640-y

Google Scholar

[3] A. Elkady and D. G. Lignos, Dynamic Stability of Deep and Slender Wide-Flange Steel Columns - Full Scale Experiments, in Proceedings of the Annual Stability Conference Structural Stability Research Council, Orlando, Florida, USA, (2016).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001937

Google Scholar

[4] J. Fogarty and S. El-Tawil, Collapse Resistance of Steel Columns under Combined Axial and Lateral Loading, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 142, no. 1, p.04015091, (2016).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001350

Google Scholar

[5] J. D. Newell and C. -M. Uang, Cyclic Behavior of Steel Wide-Flange Columns Subjected to Large Drift, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 134, no. 8, p.1334–1342, (2008).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2008)134:8(1334)

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Suzuki and D. G. Lignos, Large Scale Collapse Experiments of Wide Flange Steel Beam-Columns, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (STESSA), Shanghai, China, (2015).

Google Scholar

[7] C. M. Uang, G. Ozkula, and J. Harris, Observations from cyclic tests on deep, slender wide-flange structural, in Proceedings of the Annual Stability Conference Structural Stability Research Council, Tennessee, Nashville, USA, 2015, p.247–263.

DOI: 10.6028/nist.tn.2169

Google Scholar

[8] A. Elkady and D. G. Lignos, Full-Scale Cyclic Testing of Deep Slender Wide-Flange Steel Beam-Columns under Unidirectional and Bidirectional Lateral Drift Demands, 16th World Conf. Earthq. Eng. 16WCEE Santiago Chile Num 944, Jan. (2017).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001937

Google Scholar

[9] C. M. Ramirez and E. Miranda, Significance of residual drifts in building earthquake loss estimation, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 41, no. 11, p.1477–1493, Sep. (2012).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2217

Google Scholar

[10] FEMA, Seismic performance assessment of buildings, volume 1-methodology, the Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, FEMA P-58-1, (2012).

Google Scholar

[11] FEMA, Seismic performance assessment of buildings, volume 2-implementation guide, the Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, FEMA P-58-2, (2012).

Google Scholar

[12] A. Elkady and D. G. Lignos, Stability Requirements of Deep Steel Wide-Flange Columns under Cyclic Loading, in Proceedings of the Annual Stability Conference Structural Stability Research Council, San Antonio, Texas, USA, (2017).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001937

Google Scholar

[13] G. A. MacRae, C. R. Urmson, W. R. Walpole, P. Moss, K. Hyde, and C. Clifton, Axial shortening of steel columns in buildings subjected to earthquakes, Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthq. Eng., vol. 42, no. 4, p.275, (2009).

DOI: 10.5459/bnzsee.42.4.275-287

Google Scholar

[14] D. A. Grilli, R. Jones, and A. M. Kanvinde, Seismic Performance of Embedded Column Base Connections Subjected to Axial and Lateral Loads, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 143, no. 5, p.04017010, Jan. (2017).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001741

Google Scholar

[15] G. C. Clifton, M. Bruneau, G. A. MacRae, R. Leon, and A. Fussell, Steel Structures Damage from the Christchurch Earthquake Series of 2010 and 2011, Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthq. Eng., vol. 44, no. 4, p.297–318, Dec. (2011).

DOI: 10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.297-318

Google Scholar

[16] G. A. MacRae, G. C. Clifton, M. Bruneau, A. M. Kanvinde, and S. Gardiner, Lessons from Steel Structures in Christchurch Earthquakes, 8th Int. Conf. Behav. Steel Struct. Seism. Areas STESSA Shanghai China, p.1474–1481, Jul. (2015).

DOI: 10.1201/b11396-4

Google Scholar

[17] D. G. Lignos, T. Hikino, Y. Matsuoka, and M. Nakashima, Collapse Assessment of Steel Moment Frames Based on E-Defense Full-Scale Shake Table Collapse Tests, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 139, no. 1, p.120–132, (2013).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000608

Google Scholar

[18] H. Inamasu, A. M. Kanvinde, and D. G. Lignos, The Seismic Stability and Ductility of Steel Columns Interacting with Concrete Footings, in Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete VIII, Wyoming, USA, (2017).

Google Scholar

[19] J. Liu and A. Astaneh-Asl, Moment–Rotation Parameters for Composite Shear Tab Connections, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 130, no. 9, p.1371–1380, (2004).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1371)

Google Scholar

[20] X. Zhang and J. M. Ricles, Experimental Evaluation of Reduced Beam Section Connections to Deep Columns, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 132, no. 3, p.346–357, (2006).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2006)132:3(346)

Google Scholar

[21] B. Chi and C. M. Uang, Cyclic Response and Design Recommendations of Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections with Deep Columns, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 128, no. 4, p.464–473, (2002).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:4(464)

Google Scholar

[22] D. G. Lignos, D. Kolios, and E. Miranda, Fragility assessment of reduced beam section moment connections, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 136, no. 9, p.1140–1150, (2010).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000214

Google Scholar

[23] D. G. Lignos and H. Krawinkler, Development and utilization of structural component databases for performance-based earthquake engineering, J. Struct. Eng., vol. 139, no. 8, p.1382–1394, (2012).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000646

Google Scholar

[24] AISC, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. ANSI/AISC-341-16. American Institute of Steel Construction, (2016).

DOI: 10.1201/b11248-16

Google Scholar