Effect of Beam-Column Connection Fixity on Collapse Performance of a Six-Storey Special Concentrically Braced Frame

Abstract:

Concentrically braced frames are one of the most common seismic force resisting systems because of their high strength and stiffness. In current practice, the gusset plates that connect the brace to the adjacent beams and columns can increase the strength and stiffness of the connection significantly. This strength and stiffness can provide a reserve of lateral force resisting capacity during a large earthquake, which may play a role in the seismic collapse behaviour of the braced frame. An alternative connection has recently been proposed as a means of ensuring that brace buckling occurs only in-plane, that no field welding is required, and that all damage is confined to a replaceable brace module. However, the proposed connection does not include a gusset plate that can provide a similar stiffness and reserve capacity. In order to investigate the potential influence of the range of possible beam-column-gusset plate designs, this paper assesses the effect of the fixity of these connections on the behavior of a six-storey special concentrically braced frame. Nonlinear dynamic analyses have been conducted to determine the seismic performance of the frame with this connection modelled using three different assumptions (pinned, shear tab and fixed), and the collapse risk is assessed using the FEMA P695 methodology. The results show that when the gravity framing is not modelled, the fixity of the beam-column connections is important in avoiding the formation of a soft storey under extreme earthquakes, thereby reducing the probability of collapse of the building.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 763)
• Pages: 157-164
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.763.157
• Online since: February 2018
• Authors: Vahid Mohsenzadeh*, Lydell D.A. Wiebe
• Keywords: Collapse Performance, Connection Fixity, Multiple Stripe Analysis, Nonlinear Time History Analysis, Special Concentrically Braced Frames

References

[1] A. Astaneh-Asl, Seismic Behavior and Design of Gusset Plates, Steel TIPS, Structural Steel Educational Council, Moraga, California, December, (1998).

[2] C. W. Roeder, E. J. Lumpkin, and D. E. Lehman, A balanced design procedure for special concentrically braced frame connections, J. Constr. Steel Res. 67 (2011) 1760–1772.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.04.016

[3] D. Stevens and L. Wiebe, Large-Scale Testing of a Replaceable Connection for Concentrically Braced Frames, in 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, (2017).

[4] C. Stoakes and L. Fahnestock, Cyclic flexural testing of concentrically braced frame beam-column connections, J. Struct. Eng. 137 (2011) 739–747.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000326

[5] E. M. Hines, M. E. Appel, and P. J. Cheever, Collapse performance of low-ductility chevron braced steel frames in moderate seismic regions, AISC Engineering J., 46 (2009) 149–180.

[6] D. E. Lehman, C. W. Roeder, D. Herman, S. Johnson, and B. Kotulka, Improved seismic performance of gusset plate connections, J. Struct. Eng., 134 (2008) 890–901.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2008)134:6(890)

[7] NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture, Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 Methodology for Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors (NIST GCR 10-917-8), (2010).

[8] Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 341–16, Chicago, IL, (2016).

DOI: 10.1201/b11248-16

[9] McKenna FT, Object-oriented finite element programming: Frameworks for analysis, algorithms and parallel computing. Ph.D., University of California, CA, (1997).

[10] P. Uriz and S. Mahin, Toward earthquake-resistant design of concentrically braced steel-frame structures, UCB/PEER-2008/08, University of California, Berkeley, CA., (2008).

[11] E. Karamanci and D. Lignos, Computational approach for collapse assessment of concentrically Braced Frames in Seismic Regions, J. Struct. Eng., 140 (2014).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001011

[12] P. C. Hsiao, D. E. Lehman, and C. W. Roeder, Improved analytical model for special concentrically braced frames, J. Constr. Steel Res., 73 (2012) 80–94.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.01.010

[13] A. Elkady and D. G. Lignos, Effect of gravity framing on the overstrength and collapse capacity of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frame, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44 (2015), 1289–1307.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2519

[14] FEMA P695, Quantification of building seismic performance factors FEMA P695 ATC-63 project report, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., (2009).

DOI: 10.1061/41130(369)116

[15] J. W. Baker, Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis, Earthq. Spectra, 31 (2015) 579–599.

DOI: 10.1193/021113eqs025m

[16] P. C. Hsiao, Dawn E. Lehman, and Charles W. Roeder, Evaluation of the response modification coefficient and collapse potential of special concentrically braced frames, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44 (2013) 657–675.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2286

[17] E. J. Lumpkin, P. C. Hsiao, C. W. Roeder, D. E. Lehman, C. Y. Tsai, A. C. Wu, C. Y. Wei, and K. C. Tsai, Investigation of the seismic response of three-story special concentrically braced frames, J. Constr. Steel Res., 77 (2012), 131–144.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.04.003