Search results

At present, the studies both at home and abroad are more about ironing [1], a rare about fabric performance impacting on shaping effect.
Experiment The sample Selection of cylinder cloth which weaved by seamless fabric common materials as experimental samples, which weaved by the saint Tony SM8 - TOP2S 14 seamless knitting machine, the organizational structure for the 1 + 1 rib, a total of 16 kinds of fabrics, see table 1.
Experimental l apparatus and methods Seven mechanics index: use the FAST system , including FAST-1 compression tester, FAST-2 bending tester, FAST–3 extensibility tester.
Table 2 The Pearson analysis Correlations y T2 T100 F0 C B E5 G y Pearson Correlation 1 .483 .563* .616* -.282 .245 -.488 .630** Sig. (2-tailed) .058 .023 .011 .290 .361 .055 .009 T2 Pearson Correlation .483 1 .984** .144 -.223 .213 -.311 .081 Sig. (2-tailed) .058 .000 .594 .406 .428 .241 .764 T100 Pearson Correlation .563* .984** 1 .191 -.205 .283 -.343 .139 Sig. (2-tailed) .023 .000 .478 .447 .289 .193 .607 F0 Pearson Correlation .616* .144 .191 1 -.210 -.056 -.831** .813** Sig. (2-tailed) .011 .594 .478 .435 .837 .000 .000 C Pearson Correlation -.282 -.223 -.205 -.210 1 .540* .135 -.034 Sig. (2-tailed) .290 .406 .447 .435 .031 .619 .902 B Pearson Correlation .245 .213 .283 -.056 .540* 1 -.148 .321 Sig. (2-tailed) .361 .428 .289 .837 .031 .584 .226 E5 Pearson Correlation -.448 -.311 -.343 -.831** .135 -.148 1 -.805** Sig. (2-tailed) .055 .241 .193 .000 .619 .584 .000 G Pearson Correlation .630** .081 .139 .813** -.034 .321 -.805** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .009 .764 .607 .000 .902 .226
Table 3 The partial correlation analysis Correlations (Control Variables：F0) y T2 T100 C B E5 G Y Correlation 1.000 .505 .576 -.198 .355 .052 .284 Significance (2-tailed) . .055 .025 .479 .195 .853 .306 T2 Correlation .505 1.000 .985 -.199 .224 -.347 -.062 Significance (2-tailed) .055 .000 .477 .422 .205 .825 T100 Correlation .576 .985 1.000 -.172 .299 -.338 -.028 Significance (2-tailed) .025 .000 . .541 .278 .218 .921 C Correlation -.198 -.199 -.172 1.000 .541 -.073 .241 Significance (2-tailed) .479 .477 .541 . .037 .796 .388 B Correlation .355 .224 .299 .541 1.000 -.350 .630 Significance (2-tailed) .195 .422 .278 .037 . .201 .012 E5 Correlation .052 -.347 -.338 -.073 -.350 1.000 -.401 Significance (2-tailed) .853 .205 .218 .796 .201 . .139 G Correlation .284 -.062 -.028 .241 .630 -.401 1.000 Significance (2-tailed) .306 .825 .921 .388 .012 .139 .

The committee with combined connections of Architectural Institute of Japan [1]. 
（a）Combined connections with high–strength bolts and longitudinal welds （b）Combined connections with high–strength bolts, transverse welds, and longitudinal welds 1——L-weld, 2——T-weld, 3——Continuously around welded  Fig 1.
According to Table 1, the strength ratio of bolts and welds is a key factor of the capacity of combined connections.
Table 1.Results of FEA (kN) Specimen designation Nb Nfs Nb/ Nfs Nv Nb' Nfs' Nb'/Nb Nfs'/Nfs 4LW6-100-2M20-8.8 197 538 0.37 551 194 357 0.98 0.66 4LW10-60-2M20-8.8 197 524 0.38 546 199 347 1.01 0.66 4LW8-60-2M20-8.8 197 444 0.44 497 196 301 0.99 0.68 4LW6-80-2M20-8.8 197 439 0.45 521 196 325 0.99 0.74 4LW6-60-2M20-8.8 197 331 0.60 485 197 288 1.00 0.87 4LW4-80-2M20-8.8 197 316 0.62 459 194 265 0.98 0.84 4LW6-40-2M20-8.8 197 225 0.88 413 201 212 1.02 0.94 4LW4-40-2M20-8.8 197 171 1.15 358 197 161 1.00 0.94 4LW6-60-2M24-10.9 383 331 1.16 699 365 334 0.95 1.01 4LW6-60-2M27-8.8 479 331 1.45 786 456 330 0.95 1.00 4LW6-40-2M24-10.9 383 225 1.70 585 359 226 0.94 1.00 4LW6-40-2M27-8.8 479 225 2.13 668 447 221 0.93 0.98 4LW6-40-2M27-10.9 574 225 2.55 770 537 233 0.94 1.04 4LW4-40-2M27-10.9 574 171 3.36 647 477 170 0.83 0.99 where Nb=strength of bolts alone; Nfs =strength of longitudinal welds alone; Nv=strength of combined connection; Nb'=strength of bolts in combined connection; Nfs'= strength
References [1] The committee with combined connections of Japan in connection of high-strength bolts, edited by Y.

The FT-IR spectra of all samples show major adsorption bands at 3720, 3442, 1620, 1094, 792, 620, and 479 cm-1, as shown in Fig. 2.
On the surface, the band at 1620 cm-1 represents the H-O-H bending vibration of water, that at 1094 cm-1 may be attributed to siloxane (-Si-O-Si-) group stretching, the peak at 792 cm-1 may correspond to SiO-H vibration, and the band at 479 cm-1 may be attributed to the O-Si-O stretching vibration of SiO4 tetrahedron [6].
These groups appear as a broad band with the middle wavelength at 3400 cm-1 to 3500 cm-1 [7].
The same results were detected by XRF in Table 1.
References [1] E.

Alloy 2 is modified by PrxOy and LaxOy with a proportion of 1:1.
Fig. 1 OM images of as-cast microstructures of (a) Alloy 0, (b) Alloy 1, (c) Alloy 2.
References [1] Z.J.
Alloys Compd. 479 (2009) 30–35
Alloys Compd. 479 (2009) 342–347

Compared with conventional energy such as coal and petroleum, solar energy is inexhaustible and clean [1].
Figure 1 is a pictorial diagram brush.
Fig. 1 Rolling brush Fig. 2 The movement direction of tipped bristles Figure 2 indicates: (1) (2) Wherein, A is the angle between the axis of the spiral brush with the brush bristles.
Fig. 11 Particles 1 longitudinal displacement Fig. 12 Particles 2longitudinal displacement Fig. 13 Particles 3 longitudinal displacement Particle movement displacement is obtained by figure 8 and figure 13 as table 1 Table 1 Unit :mm displacement way Particles1 Particles2 Particles3 Top-down 474 479 474 From left to right 476 470 479 dust From table 1 it can be seen that dust particles in the top-down dust removal device and the dust removal device longitudinal displacement distance from left to right are almost the same, so it is concluded that under the same roller, pulling speed, rotation speed, these two kinds of dust removal effect is close to each other. 5 Conclusion Through the analysis of the rolling brush of the photovoltaic modules, it can be concluded that the main factor influencing the cleaning effect is the movement
References: [1] Guanjun.Bao，Linwei.Zhang,Shibo.Cai.

Fig. 1.
References [1] K.
Morsi, “Review: reaction synthesis processing of Ni–Al intermetallic materials”, Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 299, no. 1–2, pp. 1–15, Feb. 2001
[4] Wei Li Ren, Jian Ting Guo, Gu Song Li, Jian Sheng Wu., "Tensile Creep Behavior of NiAl-9Mo Eutectic Alloy", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 475-479, pp. 763-766, 2005 [5] N.
Stoloff (eds.), Pittsburgh Penn.: Materials Research Society 460 (1997) 479–486

Host phonon energy can be obtained by the phonon sideband (PSB) of Eu3+ ions [12] and Raman spectra [13,14].Fig. 1 displayed Stokes scattered Raman spectra for Yb3+-Ho3+-codoped GP80 and GP08 glass samples.
It can be seen from Fig.4 the energy difference of the 2F5/2 and 5I5 level was about 800cm-1, while the energy difference of the 2F5/2 and 5I6 level is about 1800cm-1.
It suggested that to populate 5I5 level from phonon-assisted energy transfer process from Yb3+ ions only one phonon is needed, while more than two phonons are needed to populate 5I6 level in germanium glass samples whose phonon energy is about 800cm-1 (shown in Figs.1 and 2).
Alloys Compd., Vol. 479(2009),p.557 [5] B.V.
Alloys Compd., Vol.479(2009), p. 883 [12] S.

References [1] W.
Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1996, 23(1):74-78
Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1996, 23(1):79-81
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Steel Rolling, Beijing, 2010 : 473-479
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Steel Rolling, Beijing, 2010 : 473-479

Kim and Lee (2005) asserted that the image distortion had occurred due to the characteristics of wood and ultrasound traveling when they reconstructed the CT image of wood with ultrasound, so these characteristics must be reflected during the process of CT image composition [1].
After perforating wood specimen as Fig. 1, the decayed wood strip was inserted at the center of cylinder.
��FP ��FP �QVHUW�GHFD�HG� �RRG�FRUH�DQG� VHD�HG���W�� VWHU����HG��RRG Fig. 1 Preparation of the test specimen
Table 1 indicate the measured result of moisture content for small specimen and Table 2 indicate the measured result of oven dried specific gravity.
References [1] K.M.

Table 1 The chemical composition of metakaolin (%).
Fig. 1 The XRD spectrum of metakaolin.
References [1] A.M.
Compos. 23 (2001) 479-484
Mater. 30 (2012) 470-479