Effects of Truck Impacts on Bridge Piers

Article Preview

Abstract:

According to Federal Highway Administration, impact by moving trucks is the 3rd leading cause of bridge failure or collapse in the country. Although current AASHTO LRFD Guide Specifications prescribe designing bridge piers by applying a 400 kips static load at a height of 4ft to improve their impact resistance, recent studies have shown that the dynamic forces because of truck impacts may be significantly higher than that recommended by the AASHTO Guide Specifications. In this paper, we present an extensive investigation on the impact of a three-span steel girder bridge with reinforced concrete piers by trucks running at different speeds through models of bridge and the truck in LS-DYNA, including a correlation between seismic and impact resistance of bridge piers. Results also present a comparison between static load prescribed by AASHTO Guide Specifications and dynamic impacts loads observed during numerical simulations. A performance based approach is proposed to design bridge piers against truck impacts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 639-640)

Pages:

13-25

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. Wardhana and F.C. Hadipriono, Analysis of Recent Bridge Failures in the United States. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol.17, No. 3, 2003.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144)

Google Scholar

[2] New York State Department of Transportation. 1996. Bridge safety assurance, Collision Vulnerability Manual, Albany, New York.

Google Scholar

[3] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Load and Resistance Factor Design. 2007. AASHTO-LRFD Bridge Design Specifications-fourth edition, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.

DOI: 10.3141/trr.11s.k535736t40586402

Google Scholar

[4] E.-T. Sherif and E. Severino, Vehicle Collision with Bridge Piers, Journal of Structure Engineering, Vol. (10), 2005, pp: 345-353.

Google Scholar

[5] Z. Yi, A.K. Agrawal, M. Ettouney, and S. Alampalli, Finite Element Simulation of Blast Loads on Reinforced Concrete Structures using LS-DYNA. 2007 Structures Congress: New Horizons and Better Practices, Long Beach, CA.

DOI: 10.1061/40946(248)3

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Yi, Blast Load Effects on Highway Bridges, Ph.D Dissertation, City University of New York, New York, 2009.

Google Scholar

[7] A.K. Zaouk, and D. Marzoughi, Validation of a non-linear finite element vehicle model using multiple impact data. Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection In Transportation Systems, AMD,Vol(218), PP: 91–106, 1996, ASME, New York.

DOI: 10.1115/imece1996-1017

Google Scholar

[8] Y.D. Hose, Seismic Performance and Flexural Behavior of Plastic Hinge Regions in Flexural Bridge Columns, PhD Dissertation, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 2000.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Krauthammer, and R.K. Otani, Mesh, gravity and load effects on finite element simulations of blast loads reinforced concrete structures, Computers and Structures, 63(6), 1997, p.1113.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(96)00406-3

Google Scholar

[10] LS-DYNA; theory manual for version 971.(2007). Livermore Software Technology Corporation.

Google Scholar

[11] Minnesota Department of Transportation, Bridge Office Substructure Protection Policy. Saint Paul, Minnesota, , 2007.

Google Scholar

[12] National Transportation Research Center & Heave Vehicle Research Center, 2005. Heavy Vehicle Infrastructure Asset Interaction and Collision. University of Tennessee Knoxville.

Google Scholar

[13] Texas Transportation Institute, Guidelines for Designing Bridge Piers and Abutments for Vehicle Collisions, College Station, Texas, 2008.

Google Scholar

[14] D.M. Yvonne and R. Bligh, Evaluation of LS-DYNA Concrete Material Model 159. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX, 2007.

Google Scholar