Critical Success Factors of New Product Development and Impact on Performance of Malaysian Automotive Industry

Article Preview

Abstract:

This research paper shows a framework to conduct an empirical study in Malaysian automotive industry in order to improve their performance. There are factors which are effective factors in improving performance of Malaysian automotive companies namely top management support, cross functional teamwork, new product development (NPD) process, NPD strategies, and market research activities. The critical success factor of NPD is playing a fundamental role in determining the performance in Malaysian automotive companies. In this research study, a framework has been developed that includes critical success factors of NPD and project achievement to study their influence on the performance of Malaysian automotive companies. It is hoped that this paper can provide an academic source for both academicians and managers due to investigate the relationship between critical success factors of total NPD, project achievement and company performance in a systematic manner to increase successful rate of NPD progress.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

431-437

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Booz, Allen, & Hamilton. New product management for the 1980's. New York: Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc. (1982).

DOI: 10.2172/12227106

Google Scholar

[2] Vrawford, C, New product failure rate-facts and fallacies. Research Management, (1979) 9-13.

Google Scholar

[3] Urban, C., & Hauser, J., Design and marketing of new products. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall (1993).

Google Scholar

[4] Cooper, r., Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch (3rd Ed. ). Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] Ulrich, K.T. & Eppinger, S. D, Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] Meybodi, Mohammad Z., Strategic Manufacturing Benchmarking. The TQM Megazine 17(3) (2003): 249-258.

Google Scholar

[7] Mobey, A., and Parker, D., Risk evaluation and its importance to project implementation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 51(4) (2002): 202-208.

DOI: 10.1108/00438020210430760

Google Scholar

[8] Malaysian-German Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Market Watch 2012, The Malaysian Automotive & Supplier Industry (2012).

Google Scholar

[9] MIDF Equity Beat, Automotive Sector, (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] Chen HH, Kang YK, Xing X, Lee AHI, Tong Y, Developing new products with knowledge management methods and process development management in a network. Comp. Ind (2008). 59 : 242-253.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2007.06.020

Google Scholar

[11] Johansen K, Collaborative product introduction within extended enterprises, Phd, Linkopings University, (2005).

Google Scholar

[12] Loch C, Kavadias S, Handbook of new product development management, Butterworth-Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier, (2008).

Google Scholar

[13] Ramasehan B., Caruana A., Loo S.P., The effect of market orientation on new product performance, a study among singaporeans frims, Journal of product and brand management. 11(5) (2002) : 399-409.

DOI: 10.1108/10610420210445514

Google Scholar

[14] Cooper, Robert G., Kleinschmidt, Elko J., Winning businesses in product development, the critical success factors, Research technology management. 7 (2007) 52-66.

DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2007.11657441

Google Scholar

[15] Ozer M., Production, manufacturing and logistics factors which influence decision making in new product evaluation, European journal of operational research, in press (2003).

Google Scholar

[16] Debruyne M., Moenaert R., Griffin A., Hart S., Hultink E.J., Robben H., The impact of new product launch strategies on competitive reaction in industrial markets, Journal of product innovation management, 19 (2002) : 159-170.

DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.1920159

Google Scholar

[17] Spivey, W. A, Munson, J. M, Wolcott, J.H., Improving the new product development process: Fractal paradigm for high technology products, Journal of product innovation management 14 (1997) : 203-218.

DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.1430203

Google Scholar

[18] Zirger B., Maidique M., A model of new product development : an empirical test, management science, 36 (1990): 867-883.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.36.7.867

Google Scholar

[19] Chorda M.I., Gunasekaran A., Aramburo L.B., Product development process in Spanish SMES: en empirical research, Technovation 22 (5), (2002): 301-312.

DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4972(01)00021-9

Google Scholar

[20] Varela J., Benito L., New product development process in Spanish firms: Typology, antecedents and technical/marketing activities, Technovation, In press (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.08.001

Google Scholar

[21] Cohen S.G., Bailey D.E., What makes team work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite, Journal of management, 23(3), (1997): 239-290.

DOI: 10.1177/014920639702300303

Google Scholar

[22] Ancona D.G., Caldwell D., Speeding product development: making teamwork, Cambridge MA, Sloan school management (1992).

Google Scholar

[23] Tzokas N., Hultink E. J, Hart S., Navigating the new product development process, Industrial marketing management, 33 (2004) : 619-626.

DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.09.004

Google Scholar

[24] Lu L.,Y.Y., Yang C., The R&D and marketing cooperation across new product development stages: and empirical study of Taiwan's industries, Industrial marketing management 31 (2004): 593-605.

DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.11.002

Google Scholar

[25] Firth R.W., Narayanan V.K., New product strategies of large, dominant product manufacturing frims: An exploratory analysis, Journal of product innovation management, 13 (4), (1996): 334-347.

DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.1340334

Google Scholar

[26] Hart S.J., Tzokas., The imapact of marketing research activity on SME export performance: evidence from UK, Journal of small business management, 18(5), (1999): 63-75.

Google Scholar