Paper Titles
Three-Dimensional Spatial Simulation and Distribution Characteristics of Soil Organic Matter in Coal Mining Subsidence Area
p.437
Process Simulation of Carboniferous Volcanic in Jinlong Area, Junggar Basin
p.449
Environmental Assessment of Xinhe Beach Development
p.459
Mud-Sand Flow Hazard Spatial Simulation and Analysis of Tailing Dam-Break under Different Preventive Measures
p.469
Analysis of Fractured Sections in Shale Gas Wells Based on PCA - Logistic Regression Model
p.483
Air Purification System on Reduction of CO2 Concentration Using Low Temperature Liquefaction
p.493
Response Surface Method Analysis on Electro-Enhanced Technique for Remediation of Cadmium Contaminated Soil
p.502
Numberical Simulation of Evapotranspiration with Limited Data in the Pearl River Basin
p.512
Three-Dimensional Simulation of the Influences of Operational Parameters on Stability of Formation-Cement Sheath-Casing Combination
p.525

Numberical Simulation of Evapotranspiration with Limited Data in the Pearl River Basin

Article Preview

Abstract:

This research compared and analyzed the adaptation of four evapotranspiration equations: the FAO56 Penman-Monteith (PM), Priestley-Taylor, Hargreaves-Samani and Thornthwaite equations by using the day-to-day meteorological data of the 42 observation stations in the Pearl River basin. Numberical simulation of the four equations in different seasons and regions was made in order to find out the most suitable one for the evapotranspiration estimate in the Pearl River basin. Results show that the calculation results of the PM equation seem more stable in different seasons and regions, and is closer to the actual observation, due to the detailed consideration of the effects of aerodynamics and energy supply on evapotranspiration in its calculation procedure. The missing data of relative humidity, sunshine duration, wind speed and air pressure would have influence on the calculation accuracy of the PM equation. Temperature can be used to instead of the above variable in the PM equation, which is called the PMT equation. The applicability and the calculation accuracy is explored in this study. And the results show that the calculation results of the PMT equation is larger than those of the PM equation. By setting a correction coefficient in the PMT equation, the calculation accuracy can be obviously improved. Therefore, in the absence of other data, the PMT equation calculated only using temperature data can be use as an ideal equation for the evapotranspiration calculation and research in the Pearl River basin.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Energetic Materials and Processes View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 980)

Pages:

512-524

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.980.512

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2020

Authors:

Qi Ang Huang, Chang Yuan Tang*, Zi Shen Chen, Shao Feng Li, Jia Han Li

Keywords:

Evapotranspiration, Numberical Simulation, Pearl River Basin, Penman-Monteith Equation

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Q. Liu, Z.F. Yang, B.S. Cui, et al., The temporal trends of reference evapotranspiration and its sensitivity to key meteorological variables in the Yellow River Basin, China, Hydrological Process, 24 (2010) 2171-2181.

DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7649

Google Scholar

[2] W.G. Wang, Q.X. Shao, S.Z. Peng, et al., Reference evapotranspiration change and the causes across the Yellow River Basin during 1957-2008 and their spatial and seasonal differences, Water Resources Research, 48, W05530 (2012).

DOI: 10.1029/2011wr010724

Google Scholar

[3] M.L. Roderick, M.T. Hobbins, G.D. Farquhar, Pan evaporation trends and the terrestrial water balance. I. Energy balance and interpretation, Geography Compass, 3 (2009) 746-760.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00213.x

Google Scholar

[4] M.L. Roderick, M.T. Hobbins, G.D. Farquhar, Pan evaporation trends and the terrestrial water balance. II. Energy balance and interpretation, Geography Compass, 3 (2009) 761-780.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00214.x

Google Scholar

[5] J. Shiri, Modeling reference evapotranspiration in island environments: Assessing the practical implications, Journal of Hydrology, 570 (2019) 265-280.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.068

Google Scholar

[6] Q. Liu, Z.F. Yang, Quantitative estimation of the impact of climate change on actual evapotranspiration in the Yellow River Basin, China, Journal of Hydrology, 395 (2010) 226-334.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.031

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Yang, R.S. Chen, Y.X. Song, et al., Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to meteorological factors and their elevational gradients in the Qilian Mountains, northwestern China, Journal of Hydrology, 568 (2019) 147-159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.069

Google Scholar

[8] C.Y. Xu, V.P. Singh, Evaluation and generalization of radiation-based methods for calculating evaporation. Hydrological Processes, 14 (2000) 339-349.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(20000215)14:2<339::aid-hyp928>3.0.co;2-o

Google Scholar

[9] C.Y. Xu, V.P. Singh, Evaluation and generalization of temperature methods for calculating evaporation, Hydrological Processes, 15 (2001) 305-319.

DOI: 10.1002/hyp.119

Google Scholar

[10] W. Wang, J.A. Smith, P. Ramamurthy, et al., On the correlation of water vapor and CO2: Application to flux partitioning of evapotranspiration, Water Resources Research, 52 (2015) 9452-9469.

DOI: 10.1002/2015wr018161

Google Scholar

[11] H. Zheng, Z.L. Yang, P.R. Lin. On the sensitivity of the precipitation partitioning into evapotranspiration and runoff in land surface parameterizations. Water Resources Research, 55 (2017) 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022236.

DOI: 10.1029/2017wr022236

Google Scholar

[12] Q. Zhang, C.Y. Xu, X.H. Chen, et al., Statistical behaviors of precipitation regimes in China and their links with atmospheric circulation 1960-2005, International Journal of Climatology, 31 (2011) 1665-1678.

DOI: 10.1002/joc.2193

Google Scholar

[13] M.G. Exner-Kittridge, M. ASCE, M.C. Rain, Case study on the accuracy and cost/effectiveness in simulating reference evapotranspiration in West-Central Florida, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15 (2010) 696-703.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000239

Google Scholar

[14] D.P. Zuo, Z.X. Xu, H. Yang, et al., Spatio-temporal variations and abrupt changes of potential evapotranspiration and its sensitivity to key meteorological variables in the Wei River basin, China, Hydrological Process, 26 (2012) 1149-1160.

DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8206

Google Scholar

[15] M.T. Pham, H. Vernieuwe, B. De Baets, et al., A coupled stochastic rainfall-evapotranspiration model for hydrological impact analysis, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22 (2018) 1263-1283.

DOI: 10.5194/hess-22-1263-2018

Google Scholar

[16] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al., Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, (1998).

Google Scholar

[17] M. Todorovic, B. Karic, L.S. Pereira, Reference evapotranspiration estimate with limited weather data across a rang of Mediterranean climates, Journal of Hydrology, 481 (2013) 166-176.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.034

Google Scholar

[18] M. Valiantzas, B. Karic, L.S. Pereira, Reference evapotranspiration estimate with limited weather data across a range of Mediterranean climates, Journal of Hydrology, 481 (2013) 166-176.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.034

Google Scholar

[19] C.H.B. Priestley, R.J. Taylor, On the assessment of the surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters, Monthly Weather Review, 100 (1972) 81-92.

DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:otaosh>2.3.co;2

Google Scholar

[20] G.H. Hargreaves, Z.A. Samani, Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 1 (1985) 96-109.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.26773

Google Scholar

[21] C.W. Thornthwaite, An approach toward a rational classification of climate, Geographical Review, 38 (1948) 55-94.

DOI: 10.2307/210739

Google Scholar

[22] H.B. Yang, D.W. Yang, Climatic factors influence changing pan evaporation across China from 1961 to 2001, Journal of Hydrology, 414-415 (2018) 184-193.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.043

Google Scholar

[23] Z. Li, Y.N. Chen, Y.J. Chen, et al., Analysis of changing pan evaporation in the arid region of Northwest China, Water Resources Research, 49 (2013) 2205-2212.

DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20202

Google Scholar

[24] B.H. Liu, M. Xu, M. Henderson, et al., A spatial analysis of pan evaporation trends in China, 1955-2000, Journal of Geophysical Research, 109 (2004) D15101.

DOI: 10.1029/2004jd004511

Google Scholar