Comparative Study on the Materials Removal Mechanism of Ceramics and Steels

Jian Qiang Guo; Hitoshi Ohmori; Kazutoshi Katahira; Yoshihiro Uehara

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.389-390.18

Paper Titles

Preface

Prediction of Grinding Force Distribution in Wheel and Workpiece Contact Zone
p.1

Study on the Subsurface Damage of Single Crystal MgO Substrates
p.7

Study on Improvement of Material Removal Rate in Chemo-Mechanical Grinding (CMG) of Si Wafer
p.13

Comparative Study on the Materials Removal Mechanism of Ceramics and Steels
p.18

Grinding of Carbon/Epoxy Composites Using Electroplated CBN Wheel with Controlled Abrasive Clusters
p.24

Experimental Analysis of Elastic and Plastic Behavior in Ductile-Regime Machining of Glass Quartz Utilizing a Diamond Tool
p.30

Characteristics of the Wheel Surface Topography in Ultra-precision Grinding of Silicon Wafers
p.36

Fractal Analysis of Self-Sharpening Phenomenon in cBN Grinding
p.42

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 389-390Comparative Study on the Materials Removal...

Comparative Study on the Materials Removal Mechanism of Ceramics and Steels

Abstract:

Ceramics has many advantages that cannot be substituted by metals, but its machining induced defects, such as crack and crater, are the obstacle of using ceramics in engineering. Thus, the further studies on the materials removal mechanism of ceramics should be done. As known, the cutting theory of metals is very successful and it is helpful to understand the material removal mechanism of ceramics. Through doing comparative experiments, the material removal mechanism of ceramics may be more deeply ascertained. Four types of material, such as ZrO2, SiC, STAVAX and SKD11, were ground by ELID (ELectrolytic In-process Dressing) method in this study. The grinding forces, roughness and topography of the ground surface were investigated. On the basis of this experiment, the difference of material removal mechanism between ceramics and steels was explained.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 389-390)

Pages:

18-23

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.389-390.18

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2008

Authors:

Jian Qiang Guo, Hitoshi Ohmori, Kazutoshi Katahira, Yoshihiro Uehara

Keywords:

Ceramic, Ductile Brittle Transition, ELID (ELectrolytic In-Process Dressing) Grinding, Material Removal Mechanism

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Lawn, B. R., Evans, A. G., and Marshall, D. B., 1980, Elastic/Plastic Indentation Damage in Ceramics: The Median/Radial Crack System, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 63(9-10), pp.574-581.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1980.tb10768.x

Google Scholar

[2] Marshall, D. B., Lawn, B. R., and Evans, A. G., 1982, Elastic/Plastic Indentation Damage in Ceramics: The Lateral Crack System, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 65(11), pp.561-566.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10782.x

Google Scholar

[3] Bifano, T. G., Dow, T. A., and Scattergood, R. O., 1991, Ductile-Regime Grinding: A New Technology for Machining Brittle materials, ASME J. Eng. Ind., 113(2), pp.184-189.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2899676

Google Scholar

[4] Ohmori, H., and Nakagawa, T., 1990, Mirror Surface Grinding of Silicon Wafers With Electrolytic In-Process Dressing, Annals of the CIRP, 39(1), pp.329-333. fl fl fl fl fl fl fl fl.

DOI: 10.7554/elife.21392.009

Google Scholar