Characterization and Antibacterial Effect of a Novel Nanocomposite Membrane

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this experiment, un-dried silver-hydroxyapatite-titania nanoparticles slurry was used to make membrane with Polyamide-66 by co-polymerization method. The morphology, chemical components and structures of the membrane were characterized by AAS, XRD, SEM and EDX. S. aureus, E. eoli, P.gingivalis, F.nucleatum and S.mutans were utilized to test the antibacterial effect. XRD results demonstrated that the membrane have characteristic diffraction peaks of pure HA. A homogeneous distribution of the Ca, P, Ti, and Ag element in the membrane was confirmed by EDX. Both surface and section showed porous structure which was confirmed by SEM and the holes size was average 20-30μm. The bacteria assay reflects to the antibacterial effect, 56.31 % of S. aureus and 50.10 % of E. eoli were killed after 24 hours incubation. However, 91.84 % of P. gingivalis, 90.64 % of F. nucleatum and 90.49 % of S. mutans were killed and pictures of SEM showed obviously fewer cells on the surface. So the nanocomposite membrane could be one of the bioactive materials with antibacterial properties for oral GBR technique.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 330-332)

Pages:

325-328

Citation:

Online since:

February 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] De Sanctis M, Zucchelli G and Clauser C: J Clin Periodontol. Vol. 23 (1996), p.1039.

Google Scholar

[2] Lin S. J, Hou L. T, Liu C. M, Liao C. S, Wong M. Y and Chang W. K: J Dent. Vol. 28 (2000) p.199.

Google Scholar

[3] Rominger JW and Triplett RG: J Oral Maxillofac Surg, Vol. 52 (1994), p.106.

Google Scholar

[4] Engelke W, Diederichs C and Deckwer I: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Vol. 12(1997), p.310.

Google Scholar

[5] Williams RL, Doherty PJ, Vince DG, Grashoff GJ and Williams DF: Crit Rev Biocompat. Vol. 5(1989), p.221.

Google Scholar

[6] Warriner R and Burrell R: Advances in Skin & Wound Care. Vol. 18(2005), p.2.

Google Scholar

[7] Nishioka M. Nishimura T. Ookubo A. Taya M : Biotechnology Letters. 25 (2003), p.1263.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1025031111800

Google Scholar

[8] Fujishima A and Honda K: Nature. Vol. 238 (1972), p.37.

Google Scholar

[9] Suketa N, Sawase T, Kitaura H, Naito M, Baba K, Nakayama K, Wennerberg A and Atsuta M: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. Vol. 7(2005), p.105.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00053.x

Google Scholar

[10] Meng C. Y, Hong A. N, Jian D. M and Gao P. F: Chin J Orthop Trauma, Vol. 7(2005) p.749.

Google Scholar

[11] Satoshi Imazato: Dental Materials. Vol. 19 (2003), p.449.

Google Scholar

[12] Dobosz A and Sobczynski A: Water Research. Vol. 37(2000), p.1489 a b c d.

Google Scholar