Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization with Dynamic Crowding Entropy-Based Diversity Measure

Article Preview

Abstract:

A multi-objective particle swarm optimization with dynamic crowding entropy-based diversity measure is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the elitist strategy is used in external archive in order to improve the convergence of this algorithm. Then the new diversity strategy called dynamic crowding entropy strategy and the global optimization update strategy are used to ensure sufficient diversity and uniform distribution amongst the solution of the non-dominated fronts. The results show that the proposed algorithm is able to find better spread of solutions with the better convergence to the Pareto front and preserve diversity of Pareto optimal solutions the more efficiently.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

[1] JD Schaffer. Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Lawrencee Erlbaum, 1985, 93-100.

Google Scholar

[2] CM Fonseca, PJ Fleming. Genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: formulation, discussion and generation. Forrest S. Proc. of the 5th Int'l Conf. on Genetic Algorithms. San Mateo: Morgan Kauffman Publishers, 1993, 416−423.

Google Scholar

[3] N . Srinivas, and K. Deb , Multiobjective optimization using non-dominated sorting in genetic algorithms, Evolutionary Computation, 2(1994)221−248.

DOI: 10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221

Google Scholar

[4] J. Horn, N. Nafpliotis, DE Goldberg. A niched pareto genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization. Fogarty TC. Proc. of the 1st IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway: IEEE, 1994, 82−87.

DOI: 10.1109/icec.1994.350037

Google Scholar

[5] M. Erickson, A. Mayer, J. Horn. The Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm -2 applied to the design of groundwater remediation systems. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. LNCS, 1993 (2001) 681−695.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44719-9_48

Google Scholar

[6] K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, T. Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. On Evolutionary Computation, 6 (2002)182−197.

DOI: 10.1109/4235.996017

Google Scholar

[7] Liu Liqin, Zhang Xueliang, Xie Liming, etc. Multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on dynamic crowding distance and it application. Agricultural Machinery. 41 (2010)189-194. ) (in china).

DOI: 10.1109/icicisys.2009.5357798

Google Scholar

[8] Yaonan Wang, Lianghong Wu, Xiaofang Yuan. Multi-objective self-adaptive differential evolution with elitist archive and crowding entropy-based diversity measure. Soft Comput. 14(2010)193–209.

DOI: 10.1007/s00500-008-0394-9

Google Scholar

[9] CA Coello, GT Pulido, MS Lechuga. Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 8(2004)256–279.

DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2004.826067

Google Scholar

[10] Weiyi Qian, Ajun li. Adaptive differential evolution algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 201(2008)431-440.

DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.12.052

Google Scholar

[11] I. Kennedy and R. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE Intentional Conference on Neural Networks. 1995, 1942-(1948).

Google Scholar

[12] K.T. Praveen, B. Sanghamitra, K.P. Sankar. Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization with time variant inertia and acceleration coefficients. Information Sciences, 177 (2007)5033–5049.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.06.018

Google Scholar

[13] N.K. Madavan. Multio-bjective optimization using a Pareto differential evolution approach. Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway: IEEE Service Center, 2(2002)1145-1150.

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2002.1004404

Google Scholar

[14] F. Xue, A.C. Sanderson, R.J. Graves. Pareto-based multi-objective differential evolution, Proceedings of the 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE Press, Canberra, Australia, 2(2003)862–869.

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2003.1299757

Google Scholar