Urban Regeneration and New Partnerships among Public Institutions, Local Entrepreneurs and Communities

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper aims at investigating how different approaches in the interaction among public institutions, (local) entrepreneurs and communities lead to better perform effective urban regeneration processes. At this aim, purposely selected urban regeneration programs undertaken in some neighbourhoods of Boston are discussed against a conceptual frame drawn from the civic economics theory, trying to unveil the potential of innovative forms of multiple actors’ partnerships acting together to achieve urban regeneration goals. The paper demonstrates how both a conceptual shift of the role of private investors in partnerships for urban regeneration, capable to incorporate traditionally public- led goals into private duties, and a conceptual shift of public and private partnerships mechanisms, capable to incorporate not exclusively market-oriented values but also the value of reciprocity, can led to achieve: a) territorial concentration, obtained through place-based, community- based organisations enacting also central policies; b) continuity over time, obtained through the overlapping actions of multiple- stakeholders organisations covering different goals and areas that complement each other.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

303-313

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Etzioni (ed. ): The Essential Communitarian Reader, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc. (1998).

Google Scholar

[2] A. Etzioni: The Road to the Good Society, New York, Basic Books (2001).

Google Scholar

[3] T.A. Spragens: Communitarian Liberalism, in: Etzioni A. (1995) (ed. ) New Communitarian Thinking , Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia (1995).

Google Scholar

[4] S. Zamagni: L'economia del bene comune, Roma, CittàNuova Editrice (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] R. Stoeker: The CDC model of urban redevelopment: a political economy critique and an alternative, in: Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 19, N°1, (1997), pp.1-22.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.1997.tb00392.x

Google Scholar

[6] B. Glaser, A. Strauss: The Discovery of the Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Chicago, Aldine (1967).

Google Scholar

[7] R. Johansson: Case Study Methodology, Key-note speech at the International Conference Methodologies in Housing Research, organised by the Royal Institute of Technology in cooperation with the International Association of People- Environment Studies, Stockholm, 22-24 September (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] R. Yin: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, (Fourth edition), Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage (2009).

Google Scholar

[9] B. Flyvbjerg: Five misunderstandings about case-study research, in: Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), (2006), pp.219-245.

DOI: 10.1177/1077800405284363

Google Scholar

[10] H. Gans: The Urban Villagers, The Free Press, New York (1962).

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http: /www. bostonredevelopmentauthority. org/planning/community- planning, accessed February (2014).

Google Scholar

[12] Information on http: /www. irs. gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Charitable-Organizations /Exemption-Requirements- Section-501(c)(3)-Organizations, accessed March (2014).

Google Scholar

[13] B. Cullingworth: Town and Country Planning in the UK, Routledge, London (2002).

Google Scholar

[14] Interview with Don Bianchi, MACDC, 25th April (2012).

Google Scholar

[15] Interview with Joe Krieger, MACDC, 1stMay (2012).

Google Scholar

[16] Information onhttp: /www. macdc. org/, accessed February (2014).

Google Scholar

[17] Interview with Jennifer Effron, Washington Gateway, 23rd April (2012).

Google Scholar

[18] Interview with Steve Brookes, 23rd April (2012).

Google Scholar

[19] V. Akula: A fistful of rice, Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA (2011).

Google Scholar

[20] M. Nowak: Supercooperators, New York, Free Press (2011).

Google Scholar