Transfer of Development Rights as Incentives for Regeneration of Illegal Settlements

Article Preview

Abstract:

In Italy, southern cities are often characterized by widespread phenomena of illegal settlements, that have resulted among other things in a worsening of the quality of life of the urban-rural interface, and the decline of the considerable architectural interest of the entire city. .The goal of this paper is to propose an approach that would help requalify what is already built, to make the best of what has been realized by focusing on the quality and liveability of the city. This approach is based on a particular methodology based on the promotion of Urban Complex Programs (PUC), which provide a system of development rights resulting from the demolition of unfinished illegal settlements . The benefits of this approach are many, including improvements in efficiencies and safety, meeting demands of environmental protection and reducing consumption of energy, responding to the highest standards of protection and seismic risk prevention. They can be obtained only on one condition: that they are based on a system of collective and public conveniences in accordance with the principle of sustainability in multiple dimensions (environmental, cultural, technological, political, institutional, social and economic). But for this approach to be viable it needs also to be convenient for the private actors as well. With this paper we hope to provide first an original approach that can improve the conditions of cities burdened with the problems of illegal settlements that is both sustainable and convenient and, second, an instrument that can provide information for both the public and private sectors on the fairness of the procedure and their mutual interest in pursuing this approach.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Censis: 47° Rapporto annuale sulla situazione sociale del Paese, Milano, Franco Angeli, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Stanghellini: Incentivare la rigenerazione urbana contrastando il consumo del suolo. In: Dossier su rendite ed economia urban. Information on http: /www. italianieuropei. it/it/ leiniziative/convegni/item/download/48. html‎. (2012).

Google Scholar

[3] J. Costonis: Development Rights Transfer: An Exploratory Essay, 83 Yale Law Jornal 75, 85, (1973).

DOI: 10.2307/795319

Google Scholar

[4] R. Camagni: Il finanziamento della città pubblica: la cattura dei plusvalori fondiari e il modello perequativo, in F. Curti, Urbanistica e fiscalità locale, Maggioli, Rimini (1999).

Google Scholar

[5] F. Chiodelli, S. Moroni: Indice unico e trasferibilità indifferenziata dei diritti edificatori. In: AISRe Associazione Italiana di Scienze Regionali, XXXII Conferenza Scientifica Annuale, Torino, 15-17 Settembre 2011, Il ruolo delle città nell'economia della conoscenza, (2011).

DOI: 10.3280/scre2013-002008

Google Scholar

[6] A. Duany, E. Plater-Zyberk, J. Speck: Suburban Nation: The Rise of sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York, North Point Press (2000).

DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2011.588556

Google Scholar

[7] Preliminary Document Piano Strutturale Comunale (PSC) of Reggio Calabria, (2011).

Google Scholar

[8] S. Ombuen, M. Ricci, O. Segnalino: I programmi complessi, Milano. Il sole 24 Ore (2000).

Google Scholar

[9] P. Morano, F. Tajani, The transfer of development rights for the regeneration of developments sites. In: The 2nd International Conference on Civil, Architectural and Hydraulic Engineering (ICCAHE 2013). APPLIED MECHANICS AND MATERIALS, vol. 409-410, pp.971-978, Trans Teach Publications Ltd, ISSN: 1660-9336, doi: 10. 4028/http. www. scientific. net/AMM. 409-410. 971, (2013).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.409-410.971

Google Scholar

[10] P. Morano: Un modello di perequazione urbanistico estimativo, Graffiti. Napoli (1998).

Google Scholar

[11] F. Calabrò, L. Della Spina, The cultural and environmental resources for sustainable development of rural areas in economically disadvantaged contexts. Economic-appraisals issues of a model of management for the valorisation of public assets. In: 3rd International Conference on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (ICEESD 2013). Advanced Materials Research Vols. 869-870 (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.869-870.43

Google Scholar

[12] F. Calabrò, L. Della Spina: The public-private partnerships in buildings regeneration: a model appraisal of the benefits and for land value capture. In: 5nd KKU International Engineering Conference 2014 (KKU-IENC 2014). ADVANCED MATERIALS RESEARCH, Vols. 931-932 (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.931-932.555

Google Scholar

[13] Regione Calabria, Assessorato LL. PP, Unioncamere Calabria - Prezzario opere civili, (2012).

Google Scholar

[14] C. Forte, B. de' Rossi: Principi di economia e di estimo. Milano. Etas (1992).

Google Scholar

[15] A. Realfonso: Teoria e metodo dell'estimo urbano, Roma. Nis (1994).

Google Scholar

[16] D. Lgs. n. 163/2010, art. 32 c. 2.

Google Scholar

[17] D.P.R. 207/(2011).

Google Scholar