A Fuzzy Behavioral TOPSIS Model in Manufacturing Environment

Abstract:

In this study, a novel fuzzy behavioral TOPSIS model was proposed. Sensitivity analysis is conducted according to the behavioral TOPSIS model parameter (λ) for the different case studies taken from the literature. The ranking results are slightly different according to different λ values. The results of the study can be used in material and manufacturing method selection problems.

• Periodical: Advanced Engineering Forum (Volume 31)
• Pages: 70-80
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.31.70
• Online since: February 2019
• Authors: Mehmet Alper Sofuoğlu*
• Keywords: Behavioral TOPSIS, Fuzzy Logic, Manufacturing Method Selection, Material Selection, Non-Traditional Machining

References

[1] Lootsma, F.A., Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference judgement,, Kluwer Academic Publishers,(1999).

DOI: 10.1007/b102374

[2] Roy, B.,In: J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys, (pp.3-24). Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.,(2005).

[3] Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R.B., Aghdasi, M., Albadvi, A., PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review of applications and methodologies,, European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198–215, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021

[4] Vaidya, O.S. and Kumar, S., Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications,, European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028

[5] Ho, W., Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – a literature review,, European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211–228, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004

[6] Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K.P., Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications,, New York: Springer-Verlag.,(1981).

[7] Banaitiene, N., Banaitis, A., Kaklauskas, A., & Zavadskas, E.K., Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach,, Omega, 36, 429–441,(2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.10.010

[8] Behzadian, M., Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, S., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J., A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications,, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 13051–13069, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056

[9] Zavadskas, E.K., Skibniewski, M.J., & Antucheviciene, J.,Performance analysis of Civil Engineering J. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering,, 14, 519–527,(2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2014.05.008

[10] Dadelo, S., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., & Dadeliene, R., Multi-criteria assessment and ranking system of sport team formation based on objective measured values of criteria set,, Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 6106–6113, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.036

[11] Shyur, H.-J. and Shih, H.-S., A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection,, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44, 749–761,(2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018

[12] Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Shariati, S., Haji Yakhchali, S., & Zavadskas, E. K., Proposing a new methodology for prioritising the investment strategies in the private sector of Iran,, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazˇivanja, 27, 320–345, (2014).

DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2014.947150

[13] Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Hajiagha, S. H. R., & Hashemi, S. S., Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF),, Applied Soft Computing, 24, 1013–1021, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.031

[14] Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., Krisciukaitiene, I., & Balezentis, A., Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach,, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 3302–3311, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.067

[15] Yang, S.H. and Ju, Y.B., A novel multiple attributematerial selection approachwith uncertain membership linguistic information,, Mater. Des. 63, 664–671, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.049

[16] Anojkumar, L., Ilangkumaran, M., Sasirekha, V., Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry,, Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 2964–2980, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.028

[17] Yoon, K.P. and Kim, W.K., The behavioral TOPSIS,, Expert Syst. Appl. 89, 266–272, (2017).

[18] Rathod, M.K. and Kanzaria, H.V., A methodological concept for phase change material selection based on multiple criteria decision analysis with and without fuzzy environment,, Mater. Des. 32, 3578–3585, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.040

[19] Maity, S.R. and Chakraborty, S., Turbine blade material selection using fuzzy analytic network process,, Int. J. Mater. Struct. Integr. 6 (2/3/4), 169–189, (2012).

DOI: 10.1504/ijmsi.2012.049954

[20] Kahraman, C., Öztayşi, B., Sari, I.U, Turanoğlu, E., Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets,, Knowl.-Based Syst. 59, 48–57, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.02.001

[21] Liao, T.W., A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making method for material selection,, J. Manuf. Syst. 15 (1), 1–12, (1996).

[22] Kul, Y., Şeker, A., Yurdakul, M., Usage of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methods in selection of nontraditional manufacturing methods,, Journal of the faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 29 (3), 589-603, (2014).

[23] Yurdakul, M. and Çoğun, C.,Development of a multi-attribute selection procedure for nontraditional machining processes,, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers-- Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 17, 993-1009, (2003).

DOI: 10.1243/09544050360686851