Impact Mechanics of Football Helmet with Various Shell Liner Configurations

Abstract:

The structure of the skull reveals that the cranial is made up of a number of bones. These bones, except the temporomandibular joint, are joined by sutures. The adjacent bones are strongly united by a matrix of connective tissues consisting of bundles of strong collagenous fibres connecting periosteum to the bones. The little movement at the sutures contributes to the elasticity and compliance of the cranial. This composition serves as a shock absorber and distributes impact force evenly around the skull. Frequent head impacts by footballers cause concussion which leads to brain and neurological disorders such as; Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), dementia, depression, and a loss of attention span. These disorders are primarily caused by shock waves following impact, which moves from the front to the back of the brain. As such, the effort is geared at reducing head injuries from concussion by optimising helmet design through shock absorption increase and stress amplification reduction during impact. In this paper, the suture structure is mimicked in the design of a football helmet. A fibre-reinforced composite liner is introduced in the shell of the helmet. The liner runs from the front to the back of the helmet and bisects the shell into two equal parts. Hyperelastic material model is employed in the modelling of the composite liner while the polycarbonate helmet shell is modelled as a nonlinear elastoplastic material. A finite element model based on realistic geometric features of a football helmet was carried out, and an explicit finite element code LS-DYNA® is employed to simulate dynamic responses at different impact velocities of the helmet. The simulation was repeated for various compositions of the composite liner. Impact loads are applied on one side of the helmet shell while the responses are taken on the other side of the shell body of the helmet. To establish the validity of the model, the liner, and the shell materials are made to be the same. The results revealed that the responses of the helmet during impact are the same when the two components are of the same material compared with when there is no liner on the helmet shell. It was also shown that the dynamic response curve of the helmet emanating from different impacting conditions is judged by the maximum principal stress, Von Mises stress, and acceleration monitored within the impact period. The helmet composition with a sinusoidal liner form on the shell absorbed more impact load than other liner configurations.

• Periodical: Advanced Engineering Forum (Volume 32)
• Pages: 27-39
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.32.27
• Online since: April 2019
• Authors: Theddeus Akano*, Omotayo Abayomi Fakinlede
• Keywords: Fibre-Reinforced Composite Liner, Football Helmet, Helmet Liner, Skull Sutures, Traumatic Brain Injury

References

[1] J. S. Rogers and P. L. Witt, The controversy of cranial bone motion,, J. Orthop. Sport. Phys. Ther., vol. 26, no. 2, p.95–103, (1997).

DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1997.26.2.95

[2] R. Graham et al., Sports-Related Concussions in Youth. National Academies Press (US), (2014).

[3] T. B. Hoshizaki and S. E. Brien, The Science and Design of Head Protection in Sport,, Neurosurgery, vol. 55, no. 4, p.956–967, Oct. (2004).

DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000137275.50246.0b

[4] S. Rowson et al., Can helmet design reduce the risk of concussion in football?,, J. Neurosurg., vol. 120, no. 4, p.919–922, Apr. (2014).

[5] C. Lambert, New football helmet protects the brain | Harvard Magazine,, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://harvardmagazine.com/2010/01/xenith-football-helmet-counters-concussions. [Accessed: 20-Apr-2017].

[6] K. Hansen et al., Angular Impact Mitigation system for bicycle helmets to reduce head acceleration and risk of traumatic brain injury,, Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 59, p.109–117, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.019

[7] D. Comrie and S. J. Morey, Letters to the Editor: Football helmet design and concussion,, J. Neurosurg., vol. 121, no. 2, p.491–494, Aug. (2014).

DOI: 10.3171/2014.2.jns14294

[8] A. M. Spiotta, A. J. Bartsch, and E. C. Benzel, Heading in Soccer,, Neurosurgery, vol. 70, no. 1, p.1–11, Jan. (2012).

DOI: 10.1227/neu.0b013e31823021b2

[9] M. W. Niedfeldt, Head Injuries, Heading, and the Use of Headgear in Soccer,, Curr. Sports Med. Rep., vol. 10, no. 6, p.324–329, Nov. (2011).

DOI: 10.1249/jsr.0b013e318237be53

[10] C. Withnall, Effectiveness of headgear in football,, Br. J. Sports Med., vol. 39, no. Supplement 1, pp. i40–i48, Aug. (2005).

DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.019174

[11] R. R. Navarro, Protective equipment and the prevention of concussion - what is the evidence?,, Curr. Sports Med. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, p.27–31, (2011).

[12] J. S. Delaney, A. Al-Kashmiri, R. Drummond, and J. A. Correa, The effect of protective headgear on head injuries and concussions in adolescent football (soccer) players,, Br. J. Sports Med., vol. 42, no. 2, p.110–115, Jun. (2007).

DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.037689

[13] E. J. Pellman, D. C. Viano, C. Withnall, N. Shewchenko, C. A. Bir, and P. D. Halstead, Concussion in professional football: helmet testing to assess impact performance--part 11.,, Neurosurgery, vol. 58, no. 1, pp.78-96; discussion 78-96, Jan. (2006).

DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000196265.35238.7c

[14] D. C. Viano, C. Withnall, and D. Halstead, Impact Performance of Modern Football Helmets,, Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 40, no. 1, p.160–174, Jan. (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0384-4

[15] A. Bartsch, E. Benzel, V. Miele, and V. Prakash, Impact test comparisons of 20th and 21st century American football helmets,, J. Neurosurg., vol. 116, no. 1, p.222–233, Jan. (2012).

DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.jns111059

[16] D. C. Viano, C. Withnall, and M. Wonnacott, Effect of Mouthguards on Head Responses and Mandible Forces in Football Helmet Impacts,, Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 40, no. 1, p.47–69, Jan. (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0399-x

[17] W. C. Moss, M. J. King, and E. G. Blackman, Towards reducing impact-induced brain injury: lessons from a computational study of army and football helmet pads,, Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin., vol. 17, no. 11, p.1173–1184, Aug. (2014).

DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2012.739162

[18] A. S. Nakatsuka and L. G. Yamamoto, External foam layers to football helmets reduce head impact severity.,, Hawaii. J. Med. Public Health, vol. 73, no. 8, p.256–61, Aug. (2014).

[19] J. . Hallquist, LS-DYNA keywords user's manual – Volume II (version 960),, (2012).

[20] J. . Hallquist, LS-DYNA theory manual,, (2006).

[21] Feng, Private communication,, (1993).

[22] N. Jones, Structural aspects of ship collisions,, p.308–337, (1983).

[23] A. F. Bower and CRC Press, Applied mechanics of solids. (2009).

[24] J. Cournoyer, A. Post, P. Rousseau, and B. Hoshizaki, The ability of American football helmets to manage linear acceleration with repeated high-energy impacts,, J. Athl. Train., vol. 51, no. 3, p.258–263, (2016).

DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.4.08

[25] G. S. Nusholtz, P. S. Kaiker, and W. S. Gould, Two factors critical in the pressure response of the impacted head.,, Aviat. Space. Environ. Med., vol. 58, no. 12, p.1157–1164, (1987).

[26] High Energy Impact Dispersion System | Impact Dispersal Systems, LLC (IDS)., [Online]. Available: https://www.impactdispersalsystems.com/high-energy-impact-dispersion-system. [Accessed: 26-Jul-2018].