Comparative Study between Two Substrates of Constructed Wetlands in the Treatment of Domestic Wastewater in Arid Regions

Article Preview

Abstract:

This work aims to conduct a comparative study between two natural substrates (clay and gravel) used in constructed wetlands to treat domestic wastewater effluent in arid regions. Experiments were carried out using four basins planted with phragmites australis, where two were filled with clay and two with gravel substrates. The efficiency of filtration systems has been studied by monitoring several physicochemical and organic parameters. This study is of great importance in determining the most effective type of local substrate in light of the lack of previous studies and the low spread of CWs in arid regions.Results showed that the clay filters clogged very fast, and the total Suspended Solids increased in the planted clay filter by 4 % and decreased in the planted gravel filter, where the removal efficiency was 73%. The pH was generally around neutral, with values between 6.8 and 7.2 regardless of the substrate, and the temperature was related solely to local weather conditions. The electrical conductivity was higher in the effluent from clay than the gravel filters, with 9.72 and 5.47 mS/cm, respectively. The nitrate concentration increased in all filters due to the complete transformation of ammonium to nitrate. After five days, nitrite and chemical oxygen demand removal efficiencies were 38.33%, 75% in the planted clay filter, and 60%, 88% in the planted gravel filter, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

65-75

Citation:

Online since:

April 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Tietz, et al., Characterisation of microbial biocoenosis in vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Science of the total environment, 2007. 380(1-3): pp.163-172.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.11.034

Google Scholar

[2] A.K. Choudhary, S. Kumar, and C. Sharma, Constructed wetlands: an approach for wastewater treatment. Elixir Pollution, 2011. 37(8): pp.3666-3672.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Kamble, et al., Environmental and economic performance evaluation of municipal wastewater treatment plants in India: a life cycle approach. Water Science and Technology, 2019. 79(6): pp.1102-1112.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2019.110

Google Scholar

[4] P.M. Giri, and S. Kumar, constructed wetlands for water quality improvement, recycling and reuse. Journal of aquatic biology and fisheries, 2014. 2: pp.759-763.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Corzo, and O. Sanabria, Adaptation of vegetation in high-rate constructed wetland using artificial carriers for bacterial growth: Assessment using phytopathological indicators. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2019. 32: p.100974.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100974

Google Scholar

[6] J. Vymazal, Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecological engineering, 2005. 25(5): pp.478-490.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.010

Google Scholar

[7] C. Shiwei, et al., Performance of constructed wetlands with different substrates for the treated effluent from the municipal sewage plant. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, 2019. 9(4): pp.452-462.

DOI: 10.2166/wrd.2019.032

Google Scholar

[8] J. Garcia, et al., Contaminant removal processes in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2010. 40(7): pp.561-661.

DOI: 10.1080/10643380802471076

Google Scholar

[9] B. Pucher, and G. Langergraber, Influence of design parameters on the treatment performance of VF wetlands–a simulation study. Water Science and Technology, 2019. 80(2): pp.265-273.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2019.268

Google Scholar

[10] T. Saeed, and G. Sun, A review on nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions and supporting media. Journal of environmental management, 2012. 112: pp.429-448.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.011

Google Scholar

[11] D. Ventura, et al., On the performance of a pilot hybrid constructed wetland for stormwater recovery in Mediterranean climate. Water Science and Technology, 2019. 79(6): pp.1051-1059.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2019.103

Google Scholar

[12] J. Vymazal, Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water, 2010. 2(3): pp.530-549.

DOI: 10.3390/w2030530

Google Scholar

[13] K. Kraiem, et al., Comparative study on pilots between ANAMMOX favored conditions in a partially saturated vertical flow constructed wetland and a hybrid system for rural wastewater treatment. Science of the total environment, 2019. 670: pp.644-653.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.220

Google Scholar

[14] M.G. Healy, M. Rodgers, and J. Mulqueen, Treatment of dairy wastewater using constructed wetlands and intermittent sand filters. Bioresource technology, 2007. 98(12): pp.2268-2281.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.036

Google Scholar

[15] P. Foladori, L. Bruni, and S. Tamburini, Bacteria viability and decay in water and soil of vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecological engineering, 2015. 82: pp.49-56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.058

Google Scholar

[16] F. García-Ávila, et al., Performance of Phragmites Australis and Cyperus Papyrus in the treatment of municipal wastewater by vertical flow subsurface constructed wetlands. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2019. 7: pp.286-296.

DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.04.001

Google Scholar

[17] P. Luo, et al., Nitrogen removal performance and needed area estimation of surface-flow constructed wetlands using a probabilistic approach. Journal of environmental management, 2020. 255: p.109881.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109881

Google Scholar

[18] Y. Wang, et al., Comprehensive evaluation of substrate materials for contaminants removal in constructed wetlands. Science of the total environment, 2019: p.134736.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134736

Google Scholar

[19] C.S. Akratos, and V.A. Tsihrintzis, Effect of temperature, HRT, vegetation and porous media on removal efficiency of pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecological engineering, 2007. 29(2): pp.173-191.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.06.013

Google Scholar

[20] K. Yahiaoui, et al. Domestic wastewater treatment by vertical-flow filter grown with juncus maritimus in arid region. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa. 2020, 47: pp.109-117.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jera.47.109

Google Scholar

[21] S.I. Abou-Elela, and M.S. Hellal, Municipal wastewater treatment using vertical flow constructed wetlands planted with Canna, Phragmites and Cyprus. Ecological engineering, 2012. 47: pp.209-213.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.044

Google Scholar

[22] L. Bensmina-Mimeche, M. Debabeche, and N. Benameur, capacite de filtres plantes de macrophytes pour l'epuration des eaux usees dans le climat semi-aride. Courrier du Savoir, 2013. 17: pp.33-37.

Google Scholar

[23] L. Mimeche, et al., possibilite d'elimination des polluants des eaux usees urbains sous climat aride par filtre plante du cyperus papyrus. Courrier du Savoir, 2016, 21: pp.61-66.

Google Scholar

[24] J. Vymazal, Plants used in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow: a review. Hydrobiologia, 2011. 674(1): pp.133-156.

DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0738-9

Google Scholar

[25] M. Abissy, and L. Mandi, Utilisation des plantes aquatiques enracinées pour le traitement des eaux usées urbaines: cas du roseau. Revue des sciences de l'eau/Journal of Water Science, 1999. 12(2): pp.285-315.

DOI: 10.7202/705353ar

Google Scholar

[26] J. Rodier, B. Legube, and N. Merlet, Analyse de l'eau Rodier. 9ème edition, 9th editio, 2009, Paris.

Google Scholar

[27] R. Blazejewski, and S. Murat-Blazejewska, Soil clogging phenomena in constructed wetlands with subsurface flow. Water Science and Technology, 1997. 35(5): pp.183-188.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.1997.0193

Google Scholar

[28] I. Bruch, et al., Influence of soil physical parameters on removal efficiency and hydraulic conductivity of vertical flow constructed wetlands. Ecological engineering, 2014. 68: pp.124-132.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.069

Google Scholar

[29] G. Hua, et al., An integrated model of substrate clogging in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Journal of environmental management, 2013. 119: pp.67-75.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.023

Google Scholar

[30] P. Knowles, et al., Clogging in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands: occurrence and contributing factors. Ecological engineering, 2011. 37(2): pp.99-112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.08.005

Google Scholar

[31] L.L. Zhuang, et al., The configuration, purification effect and mechanism of intensified constructed wetland for wastewater treatment from the aspect of nitrogen removal: A review. Bioresource technology, 2019. 293: p.122086.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122086

Google Scholar

[32] D. Belkhiri, Traitement des eaux usées urbaines (Aspect environnemental). Mém. Ing. Eco et Env. Eco. Forestier Université de Sétif, 115p, (1999).

Google Scholar

[33] A.I. Stefanakis, et al., Effluent quality improvement of two pilot-scale, horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands using natural zeolite (clinoptilolite). Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2009. 124(1-3): pp.131-143.

DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.05.005

Google Scholar

[34] D. Belghyti, et al., Caractérisation physico-chimique des eaux usées d'abattoir en vue de la mise en oeuvre d'un traitement adéquat: cas de Kénitra au Maroc. Afrique Science: Revue Internationale des Sciences et Technologie, 2009. 5(2): pp.199-216.

DOI: 10.4314/afsci.v5i2.61730

Google Scholar

[35] J. Rodier, L'analyse de l'eau naturelle, eaux résiduaires, eaux de mer, 8ème Edition DUNOD technique. Paris, 2005: pp.1008-1043.

Google Scholar

[36] J. Vymazal, Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the total environment, 2007. 380(1-3): pp.48-65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.014

Google Scholar

[37] S. Xinshan, L. Qin, and Y. Denghua, Nutrient removal by hybrid subsurface flow constructed wetlands for high concentration ammonia nitrogen wastewater. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2010. 2: pp.1461-1468.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.159

Google Scholar

[38] C. Keffala, and A. Ghrabi, Nitrogen and bacterial removal in constructed wetlands treating domestic waste water. Desalination, 2005. 185(1-3): pp.383-389.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.045

Google Scholar

[39] N. Seghairi, et al., Possibilités d'élimination des phosphates et de l'azote à partir des eaux usées domestiques en utilisant un filtre planté de papyrus. (2013).

DOI: 10.7202/705238ar

Google Scholar

[40] G. Sun, and D. Austin, Completely autotrophic nitrogen-removal over nitrite in lab-scale constructed wetlands: Evidence from a mass balance study. Chemosphere, 2007. 68(6): pp.1120-1128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.060

Google Scholar

[41] J.G. Kuenen, and L. Robertson, Ecology of nitrification and denitrification. (1988).

Google Scholar

[42] E. Paul, and F. Clark, Soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego. Soil microbiology and biochemistry. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego., (1996).

DOI: 10.1017/s0014479797213128

Google Scholar

[43] C.G. Lee, T.D. Fletcher, and G. Sun, Nitrogen removal in constructed wetland systems. Engineering in Life Sciences, 2009. 9(1): pp.11-22.

Google Scholar

[44] R. Hauck, Atmospheric Nitrogen. Chemistry, Nitrification, Denitrification, and their Interrelationships, in The Natural Environment and the Biogeochemical Cycles1984, Springer. pp.105-125.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-38829-6_5

Google Scholar

[45] L. Huang, et al., Interactive effect of carbon source with influent COD/N on nitrogen removal and microbial community structure in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Journal of environmental management, 2019. 250: p.109491.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109491

Google Scholar

[46] Q. He, and K.R. Mankin, performance variations of cod and nitrogen removal by vegetated submerged bed wetlands 1. Jawra. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2002. 38(6): pp.1679-1689.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04373.x

Google Scholar