Influence of Modeling Approaches on the Response of a Retaining Wall

Abstract:

In this article, the evaluation of the behavior of a gravity retaining wall is analyzed by considering different modeling approaches. The influence of taking into account the spatial variability of soil parameters in modeling approaches on the response of a retaining wall, assessed through horizontal displacements behind the wall and vertical displacements at the base of the wall. The displacements were evaluated with the finite element software CESAR, developed by the Central Laboratory of Bridges and Roads in France (LCPC), and the statistical analysis of the results was performed with Microsoft Excel. The results indicated that the effects of modeling the soil as a heterogeneous case on the wall displacements were much more significant than when the soil is modeled considering the statistically homogeneous case or the analysis case of a multilayer. This influence of the modeling of the soil as being totally heterogeneous is expressed through the lower standard deviations of the displacements, and also through the narrowness of the band defined by the maximums and the minimums of the results of the displacements, with respect to the two other modeling cases. This result leads towards a gain in terms of accuracy of the results, considering the spatial variability of the soil parameters in both directions, horizontal and vertical.

• Periodical: Advanced Engineering Forum (Volume 49)
• Pages: 103-112
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-7wfmni
• Online since: May 2023
• Authors: Kahil Amar*, Baziz Karim
• Keywords: CESAR-LCPC, Gravity Retaining Wall, Modeling Approach, Spatial Variability, Uncertainty, Wall Displacements

References

[1] He P, Fenton GA, Griffiths D. Calibration of resistance factors for gravity retaining walls. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 2022:1-9.

DOI: 10.1080/17499518.2022.2083180

[2] Goh A, Zhang F, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Liu H. A simple estimation model for 3D braced excavation wall deflection. Computers and Geotechnics 2017;83:106-13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.10.022

[3] Zhou X, Xie Y, Huang X, He H. Antislip stability analysis of gravity retaining wall by probabilistic approach. International Journal of Geomechanics 2019;19:04019045.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001413

[4] Sert S, Luo Z, Xiao J, Gong W, Juang CH. Probabilistic analysis of responses of cantilever wall-supported excavations in sands considering vertical spatial variability. Computers and Geotechnics 2016;75:182-91.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.02.004

[5] Luo Z, Li Y, Zhou S, Di H. Effects of vertical spatial variability on supported excavations in sands considering multiple geotechnical and structural failure modes. Computers and Geotechnics 2018;95:16-29.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.11.017

[6] Guha Ray A, Baidya D. Reliability coupled sensitivity based design approach for gravity retaining walls. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A 2012;93:193-201.

DOI: 10.1007/s40030-013-0023-1

[7] Baidya D, GuhaRay A. Geotechnical Engineering Reliability Aspects". 2017.

[8] Magnan J-P. Les méthodes statistiques et probabilistes en mécanique des sols: Presses Ponts et Chaussées; 1982.

[9] Amouzou GY, Soulaïmani A. Numerical Algorithms for Elastoplacity: Finite Elements Code Development and Implementation of the Mohr–Coulomb Law. Applied Sciences 2021;11:4637.

DOI: 10.3390/app11104637

[10] MAGNAN J-P, MESTAT P. Lois de comportement et modélisation des sols: Ed. Techniques Ingénieur; 1997.

DOI: 10.51257/a-v1-c218

[11] Mokeddem A. Modélisation géomécanique et probabiliste des rideaux de palplanches: prise en compte de l'interaction sol-structure et de la variabilité spatiale du sol: Université de Bordeaux; 2018.

DOI: 10.3406/ecoru.1999.5135

[12] Costet J, Sanglerat G. Cours pratique de mécanique des sols, Tome 2, Calcul des ouvrages. Imprimerie Gauthier-Villars, Paris 1983.

[13] Mestat P, Humbert P, Dubouchet A. Recommandations pour la vérification de modèles d'éléments finis en géotechnique. BULLETIN-LABORATOIRES DES PONTS ET CHAUSSEES 2000:33-52.

[14] Dhatt G, Touzot G, Lefrançois E. Méthode des éléments finis: Lavoisier; 2005.

[15] Mestat P. Maillages d'éléments finis pour les ouvrages de géotechnique. Conseils et recommandations. Bulletin-Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées 1997:39-64.

[16] Debard Y. Méthode des éléments finis: élasticité plane. Institut Universitaire de Technologie du Mans 2009.

[17] Humbert P, Dubouchet A, Fezans G, Remaud D. CESAR-LCPC, un progiciel de calcul dédié au génie civil. Bulletin des laboratoires des ponts et chaussées 2005;256:7-37.

[18] Varga R, Jelušič P. Failure Probability of an Optimally Designed Gravity Retaining Wall. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering 2022;8:04022007.

DOI: 10.1061/ajrua6.0001223