Information Assessment Model Based on Low-Carbon Theory

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper integrates the fuzzy mathematics theory, finance theory, assessment theory and etc., using a variety of tools such as MATLAB, SPSS and Excel, under the consideration of the uncertainty and volatility of the IT investment and the diversification and intangibility of the IT profit, and builds the IT real options assessment model under the fuzzy environment. The expected investment costs and benefits are represented by fuzzy numbers, because the ambiguity of IT cost-benefit makes parameters of the model difficult to be accurately predicted. Based on the above study, taking into account of the low-carbon indicator, the paper optimizes the fuzzy real options model. Through using manufacturing enterprise samples, the IT real option values are calculated and detail analysis for the results are made. And by studying the relationship and mutual influence pattern between IT and low-carbon index, this paper provides theoretical guidance for the low-carbon IT development and enhances the construction of resource-saving society and low-carbon economy in China.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

652-658

Citation:

Online since:

September 2012

Export:

Share:

Citation:

[1] Paul M. Tuten. A Model for the Evaluation of IS/IT Investments[D], Nova Southeastern University, (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] Solow R, We'd better watch out [Z]. New York Times Book Review, 1987, 12: 36.

Google Scholar

[3] Mckinsey, IT and productivity[R], 2001, 10, 17.

Google Scholar

[4] Moschella D C. Wave of power: Dynamics of Global Technology Leadership 1964-2010, [M]. New York: AMACOM, (1997).

Google Scholar

[5] Brian L. Information Technology investments: Characteristics, choices, market risk and value[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2003, (5): 289~301.

Google Scholar

[6] Lee B. An intergrated assessment of productivity and efficiency impacts of information technology investments, old data, new analysis and evidence[J]. Journal of Producticity Analysis, 1999, (12): 21~43.

Google Scholar

[7] Olafssan S. Making decisions under uncertainty-implications for high technology investments[J]. BT TechnologyJournal, 2003, (2): 170~183.

Google Scholar

[8] Karl Westerlind. Evaluating Return On Information Technology Investment, Gothenburg University[D], (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] Greenpeace International. Make It Green--Cloud Computing and its Contribution to Climate Change, March, (2010).

Google Scholar

[10] Stern, N. etc. Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change, HM Treasury, London, (2006).

Google Scholar

[11] Microsoft. Information Technology: A Key to Strengthening Economies and Advancing National Priorities, (2010).

Google Scholar

[12] Tapio P. Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001[J]. Transport Policy, 2005 , 12: 137-151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001

Google Scholar

[13] Daniel Castro. Learning from the Korean Green IT Strategy, The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, August, (2009).

Google Scholar

[14] Tiansheng Xu, Hong Qiao. Month Effect Research of SSE A-share Based on Balanced Influence. The 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering Proceedings. 2010, 451~453.

DOI: 10.1109/icime.2010.5478113

Google Scholar