Dynamic Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio for Threshold Strain in Cohesionless Soils

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on modern ideas of thermomechanics, small strain dynamic dissipation function of Hardin-Drnevich model for soils is formulated using the assumptions of the beeline and the skeleton curve shift laws. Fundamentally, for cohesionless soils, two types of cyclic strain thresholds are identified: first threshold strain and second threshold strain represent boundaries between fundamentally different dynamic characteristics of cyclic soil behavior. Comparison between the two threshold shear strain values and dynamic degradation curves obtained on exactly the same soils, the results showed that the ratio of secant modulus and maximum dynamic shear modulus for the first threshold strain are almost 1.0, and the damping ratio is almost constant. When dynamic strain level exceeds the second threshold strain, the soil behavior is considerably at nonlinear, and the primary deformation mechanism is related to fabric changes during cyclic loading. The first and the second threshold strains are therefore essential for the understanding and solving soil dynamic problems.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1603-1606

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Vucetic. Cyclic threshold shear strains in soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 120(1994), P. 2208.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2208)

Google Scholar

[2] J.A. Díaz-Rodríguez and J.A. López-Molina. Strain thresholds in soil dynamics. In Proceeding: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing (2008).

Google Scholar

[3] D.S. Robert and K. Lembit. Threshold of dilation under cyclic loading. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 103(1977), P. 1174.

Google Scholar

[4] G. Lanzo, M. Vucetic and M. Doroudian. Reduction of shear modulus at small strains in simple shear. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 123(1997), P. 1035.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1997)123:11(1035)

Google Scholar

[5] C.C. Hsu and M. Vucetic. Threshold Shear Strain for Cyclic Pore-Water Pressure in Cohesive Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 132(2006), P. 1325.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2006)132:10(1325)

Google Scholar

[6] B.O. Hardin and V.P. Drnevich. Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equations and curves. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 98(1972), P. 667.

DOI: 10.1061/jsfeaq.0001760

Google Scholar

[7] X.X. Guo, S.C. Chi, J. Yang and G. Lin. Strain threshold dynamic model for soils based on generalized thermodynamics. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 39(2008), P. 1037(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] X.X. Guo, S.C. Chi and G. Lin. Recognition of dynamic Hardin-Drnevich model for soils based on generalized thermodynamics. Rock and Soil Mechanics, Vol. 29(2008), P. 2335(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] X.J. Kong , S.L. Lou, D.G. Zou , G.X. Jia and G.C. Han. The equivalent dynamic shear modulus and equivalent damping ratio of rockf ill material for dam. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 8(2001), P. 20 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar