The Effects of Fuel Injection Angle and Injection Velocity on Propulsive Droplets Sizing in a Duct

Article Preview

Abstract:

— The effects of fuel injection angles on the average diameter of fuel propulsive droplets sizing and efficient mass fraction in combustion chamber of a ramjet are numerically investigated in the present paper. We named the mass of fuel vapor inside the flammability limit as the efficient mass fraction. In order to investigate the effects of fuel injection angle on the mean diameter of fuel propulsive droplets sizing, there are conducted two sets of calculation. The fuel injection angle of part I is varied as 30°, 45°, and 60° in flow direction, also the fuel injection angle of part II is counter-flow and varied as 0°, 30°, 45° and 60° to examine its effects on the fuel droplets and fuel/air mixing phenomena, as well as we have increased the fuel injection velocity from 40 to 45, 50 and 55m/s respectively and we have inspected the needed data again. To fulfill the calculation we used a modified version of KIVA-3V.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2879-2887

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] KIVA-II: A Computer Program for Chemically Reactive Flows with Sprays, Los Alamos, National laboratory.

Google Scholar

[2] S. R. Turns, An introduction to Combustion Concepts and Applications, Second edition, Chapter 10 , 369-410 (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] L. Hubbard, V. E. Denny and A. F. Mills, Droplet Evaporation: Effects of Transiments and Variable Properties, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, U.S. A.

Google Scholar

[4] F. R. Newbold and N. R. Amundson. A model for evaporation of a multi-component droplet, A.Z. Ch.E. JI, 19, 22-30 (1973).

Google Scholar

[5] K. Prommersberger, G. Maier, S. Wittig, Validation and Application of a Droplet Evaporation Model for Real Aviation Fuel.

Google Scholar

[6] B. E. Gelfand, Droplet Breakup Phenomena in Flows With Velocity Lag, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. Vol. 22. pp.201-265, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1285(96)00005-6

Google Scholar

[7] Salah Addin B. Al-Omari, Numerical simulation of liquid fuel sprays evolution and the subsequent vapor/air mixture formation in a duct with a 90°-bend, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 35 (2008) 1397–1402.

DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2008.09.006

Google Scholar

[8] V. M. Alipchenkov, L. I. Zaichik, Yu. A. Zeigarnik, S. L. Solov'ev, and O. G. Stonik, The Development of a Three-Fluid Model of Two Phase Flow for a Dispersed-Annular Mode of Flow in Channels: Size of Droplets, High Temperature, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2002, p.594.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.07.011

Google Scholar

[9] J. C. Kent, Quasi-steady diffusion-controlled droplet evaporation and condensation, Appl. Scent. Res., Ser. AD, 315-359 (1973).

DOI: 10.1007/bf00413076

Google Scholar

[10] Williams, Combustion of droplets of liquid fuels: a review, Comber. Flume 21, l-31 (1973).

Google Scholar

[11] Amsden, P. J. O'Rourke, T. D. Butler, KIVA-II: A Computer Program for Chemically Reactive Flows with Sprays, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, LA-11560-MS, May (1989).

DOI: 10.2172/6228444

Google Scholar