Analysis of the Relationship between CTOD Toughness and Micromechanism of Marine Steel Weld Joints

Article Preview

Abstract:

Several tests including CTOD and Charpy impact have been performed on the weld joints of high strength low alloy steel S335G10+N to identify the toughness. The fracture surface and microstructure of samples extracted from the weld joints are characterized using scanning electron microscopy. Based on all data obtained some relationships between toughness and microstructure has been detected. (1) The tendency of Charpy impact energy distribution with the position of notch is similar to the CTOD values in WP and FL but different in FL+2.CTOD values of FL+2 are greater than those of FL, but the Charpy impact energy has an opposite tendency. (2) The appearance of Pearlite and upper bainite found in WP sample S3554 is regarded as one of the reasons for the lowest CTOD values. The cavity and quasi-cleavage in S35510 fracture surface indicate an inferior toughness compared with some dimples and ripple morphology of slip separation in S3552. (3)Grains close to the fracture surface in the 35511 (Stable crack growth) of FL +2 were elongated owing to plastic deformation caused by crack growth. (4)Hardness of the HAZ is equal to fusion zone and lower than base metal or weld position in S35511. Hardness of fusion zone increases with the depth. (5)A big difference of Average Grain Size is found in microstructure close to the fracture surface among S3557, S3556 and S3559.The greater the Average Grain Size is, the lower the CTOD value will appear.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1867-1873

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhangmu Miao, Jin Cao, Tao Ma, Yongxin Li and Bingquan Chen: Ship Building of China. Vol. 48(2007),p.73

Google Scholar

[2] J. Spurrier, P. Hancock and J.P. Chubb: Engineering Fracture Mechanics .Vol.53 (1996), p.581

Google Scholar

[3] J.J. Coronado and C. Cerón: Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics .53 (2010), p.145

Google Scholar

[4] W.W. Bose Filho, A.L.M. Carvalho and P.Bowen: Materials Science and Engineering .A .452 (2007), p.401

Google Scholar

[5] BS EN 10225: Weldable structural steels for fixed offshore structures — Technical delivery conditions. London: British Standard Institution, (2009)

DOI: 10.3403/02338491

Google Scholar

[6] BS7448:Part2: Method for Determination of KIC, Critical CTOD and Critical J Values of Welds in Metallic Materials. London: British Standard Institution, (1997)

DOI: 10.3403/01124251

Google Scholar

[7] Materials and NDE: Materials and Qualification Procedures for Ships. Lloyd's Register, (2010)

Google Scholar

[8] DNV-OS-C401: Fabrication and Testing of Offshore Structures. DET NORSKE VERITAS, (2008)

Google Scholar

[9] Jae-il Jang, Jung-Suk Lee and Jang-Bog Jub:Materials Science and Engineering.A351 (2003), p.183

Google Scholar

[10] ASTM_E1382-97: Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size Using Semiautomatic and Automatic Image Analysis. ASTM, (2004)

DOI: 10.1520/e1382-97r10

Google Scholar