Aero-Elastic Active Control Modeling via Improved POD Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The main goal of present paper is to construct an efficient reduced order model (ROM) for aerodynamic system modeling. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) is presented to address the problem. First, the snapshots are collected to form the POD kernel, and then Singular Values Decomposition (SVD) is used to obtain POD modes, finally POD-ROM can be constructed by projecting full order aerodynamic system to POD modes subspace. However, the robustness of ROM constructed via conventional POD method is not guaranteed. To improve the robustness of conventional POD method, balanced truncation modification was introduced. Aero-elastic active control case was chosen for this new method validation. The results demonstrate POD method with balanced modification is efficient and accurate enough for aeroelastic system analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

339-346

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Rosenfeld A, Kark A C. Digital Picture Processing [M]. Academic Press, 1982.

Google Scholar

[2] Algazi V R, Sakrison D J. On the optimality of the Karhunen Loéve expansion [J]. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 1969, 15:319-321.

DOI: 10.1109/tit.1969.1054286

Google Scholar

[3] Andrews C A,Davies J M,Schwartz G R. Adaptive Data Compression [J]. In Proc.IEEE,1967,55:267-277.

Google Scholar

[4] Krysl P,Lall S,Marsden J E. Dimensional Model Reduction in Nonlinear Finite element dynamics of solids and structures [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,2001,51:479-504.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.167

Google Scholar

[5] Lumley J L. The Structure of Inhomogeneous turbulence [J]. Atmospheric Turbulence and Wave Propagations,1967,pp.166-178.

Google Scholar

[6] Pablo Hidalgo. POD Study of the Coherent Structures with a Turbulent Spot [J]. AIAA 2006-1099, 2006.

Google Scholar

[7] Zhenkun Feng. Investigations of Nonlinear Aeroelasticity Using a Reduced Order Fluid Model Based on POD method [J]. AIAA 2007-4305, 2007.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-4305

Google Scholar

[8] K.L. Lai, K.S. Won. Flutter Simulation and Prediction with CFD-based Reduced-Order Model [J]. AIAA 2006-2026, 2006.

Google Scholar

[9] Grigorios Dimitriadis, Gareth A. Vio. Flight-Regime Dependent Reduced Order Models of CFD/FE aeroelastic systems in transonic flow [J]. AIAA 2007-1989, 2007.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-1989

Google Scholar

[10] Piergionvanni Marzocca, Walter A. Silva, Liviu Librescu, Open/Closed-Loop Nonlinear Aeroelasticity for Airfoils via Volterra Series Approach. AIAA-2002-1484

DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-1484

Google Scholar

[11] Sorin Munteanu, John Rajadas, A Volterra Kernel Reduced-Order Model Approach for Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis, AIAA 2005-1854

DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-1854

Google Scholar

[12] Jeffrey P. Thomas, Earl H. Dowell, Virtual Aeroelastic Flight Testing for the F-16 Fighter with Stores, AIAA 2007-1640

Google Scholar

[13] Jeffrey P. Thomas, Kennth C. Hall, Early H. Dowell, Modeling Limit Cycle Oscillation Behavior of the F-16 Fighter Using a Harmonic Balance Approach, AIAA 2004-1696

DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-1696

Google Scholar

[14] Li Jie, Huang Shouzhi, Jiang Shengju, Li Fengwei, Unsteady Viscous Flow Simulation by a Fully Implicit Method with Deforming Grid. AIAA 2005-1221

DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-1221

Google Scholar

[15] Moore B C. Principle Component Analysis in Linear System Controllability, Observability, and Model Reduction, IEEE Trans on Automatic Control, 1981, 26(1): 17-31

DOI: 10.1109/tac.1981.1102568

Google Scholar

[16] Yao Weigang, Xu Min, Ye Mao. Unsteady Aerodynamic Force Modeling via Proper Orthogonal Decompostion, Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics[J].42(4):638-644

Google Scholar