Multivariate Statistical Process Control with Multi-Dots Alarm Rules

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper mainly studied to building multivariate control charts of multi-dots alarm rules. For different multi-dots alarm rules, control limit parameters can be given by a kind of method of calculating average run length. Then the performances of those kinds of multivariate control schemes under different alarm rules were compared with Hotelling T2 chart, MCUSUM and MEWMA. We can find from this compare that those charts under different alarm rules have advantage in detecting small changes in the mean vector of a multivariate process. At last, an example is used to illustrate how this method can be used in practice.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

275-279

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Montgomery, D. C. and Mastrangelo, C. M., Some statistical process control methods for autocorrelated data. Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 23(1991), p.179.

DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1991.11979321

Google Scholar

[2] Lowry, C.A. A Review of Multivariate Control Charts. IIE Transactions, Vol.27 (1995), p.800.

Google Scholar

[3] Hotelling, H. Multivariate Quality Control. Techniques of Statistical Analysis, (1947), p.113.

Google Scholar

[4] Alt, F.A. Multivariate Quality Control. The Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, (1984), p.110.

Google Scholar

[5] Jackson, J.E. Multivariate Quality Control. Communications in Statistic, Vol.14 (1985), p.2657.

Google Scholar

[6] Wierda, S.J. Multivariate Statistical Process Control – Recent Results and Directions for Further Research. Statistical Neerlandica, Vol.48 (1994), p.147.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1994.tb01439.x

Google Scholar

[7] Mcgregor, J.F. SPC of Multivariate Processes. Control Engineering Practice, Vol.3(1995), p.403.

Google Scholar

[8] Healy, J.D. A Note on Multivariate CUSUM Procedures. Technometrics, Vol.29 (1987), p.409

DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1987.10488268

Google Scholar

[9] Crosier, R.B. Multivariate Generalizations of CUSUM. Technometrics, Vol.30 (1988), p.291

Google Scholar

[10] Pignatiello, J.J, Runger, G.C. Comparisons of Multivariate CUMSUM Charts. Journal of Quality Technology, Vol.22 (1990), p.173

DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1990.11979237

Google Scholar

[11] Woodall, W.H. Multivariate CUSUM Qualtiy Control Procedures. Technometrics, Vol.27 (1985), p.285

DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1985.10488053

Google Scholar

[12] Lowry, C.A. and W.H. Woodall, A Multivariate Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Control Chart. Technometrics, Vol.34 (1992), p.46

DOI: 10.2307/1269551

Google Scholar

[13] Amir J. and Ali A. Houshmand, Average Run Length Comparison of Multivariate Control Charts. Journal of Statistical Computer, Vol.69 (2001), p.125.

DOI: 10.1080/00949650108812086

Google Scholar

[14] Michael B.C. Khoo and S.H. Quah, Alternatives to the Multivariate Control Chart for Process Dispersion. Quality Engineering, Vol.16 (2004), p.423.

DOI: 10.1081/qen-120027944

Google Scholar

[15] Arthur B. Yeh, etc. A Multivariate Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Control Chart for Monitoring Process Variability. Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol.30 (2003), p.507.

DOI: 10.1080/0266476032000053655

Google Scholar