The Motion-Overlap Scheme for Reducing the Time between Continuous Scans of Wafer Stage for Step-and-Scan Lithography

Article Preview

Abstract:

During the exposure process of a step-and-scan lithography, the transitional time between continuous scans does not produce production efficiency in which no scanning occurs. To minimize the transitional time and therefore to improve the productivity we introduce the motion-overlap scheme, which inserts a step-move between the overrun phase and the phase before exposure of next field along the scanning direction for wafer stage during the continuous exposure process. The simulation results show that the motion-overlap scheme enables the total time of two continuous scans of four different exposure field sizes reduce 8.28%, 7.11%, 5.87% and 4.53%, respectively, compared with the conventional motion planning method. This indicates that the theoretical derivation of motion-overlap planning method is effective.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

110-115

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] V.B. Martin, J. Hans, S. Steve, et al. Proc. SPIE Vol. 2726(1996), pp.734-753.

Google Scholar

[2] J. D Buckley,. and C. Karatzas, Proc. SPIE Vol. 1088 (1989), pp.424-433.

Google Scholar

[3] G. de. Zwart, M. van. den Brink, R. George et al. Proc. SPIE Vol. 3051(1997), pp.817-835.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Rothschild, T.M. Bloomstein, T.H. Fedynyshyn et al. Lincoln Laboratory Journal Vol. 14 (2003), pp.221-236.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Mack, S. Consiglio, J. Bright et al. Proc. SPIE Vol. 6153(2006), 61530T.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Hempel, S. Volt and W. Grundke. Lithography White Papers 01 December (2006).

Google Scholar

[7] AV. Ferris-Prabhu. IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine Vol. 5 (1989) , pp.37-39.

Google Scholar

[8] C.F. Chien., S.C. Hsu, and C.P. Chen. IEEE Trans Semiconductor Manufacture Vol. 14(2001), pp.157-162.

Google Scholar

[9] C.M.H. Kuijpers, C.A.J. Hurkens, and M.J.B. Melissen. Statistica Neerlandica Vol. 51(1997), pp.55-71.

DOI: 10.1111/1467-9574.00037

Google Scholar

[10] D.S.J. J Van. EUROPEAN Patent. EP 1452920A3 (2006).

Google Scholar

[11] P.H. Meckl and P.B. Arestides. Proceedings of the American Control Conference Vol. 5 (1998), pp.2627-2631.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Lambrechts, M. Boerlage and M. Steinbuch: Control Engineering Practice Vol. 13 (2005), pp.145-157.

Google Scholar

[13] K.D. Nguyen, I. M. Chen and T.C. Ng: Proc. of IEEE/ASME (2007) pp.1-6.

Google Scholar

[14] L.S. Lu, H.H. Pan: Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique Vol. 5(2006), pp.8-10, 14, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[15] H.H. Pan, X.Q. Li, S.J. Yan et. al. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 44(2008), pp.154-161, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[16] H.H. Pan, L. Chen, X.Q. Li et. al. High Technology Letters Vol. 14(2008), pp.282-288.

Google Scholar