Experimental Investigation on Cavitation Noise of Water Jet and its Chaotic Behaviour

Article Preview

Abstract:

The cavitation noise signals were collected separately for the cavitation nozzle and general nozzle at the target position and the nozzle exit in the condition of different standoff distance. The features of signal’s frequency spectrum and power spectrum were analyzed for different nozzles. Based on chaotic theory, phase space reconstruction was processed and the maximum Lyapunov exponent was calculated separately for each cavitation signal’s time series. Under the condition of this experiment, the difference between the general nozzle and cavitation nozzle was mostly marked at the target position while the standoff distance is 35 mm, which mainly displayed at the high frequency segment. The maximum Lyapunov exponent calculated appeared at standoff distance 35 mm. At the nozzle exit, the noise signal of cavitation nozzle is different from the general nozzle. The difference also displayed at the high frequency segment, and no changing with the standoff distance

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3919-3924

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Teddy ARDIANSYAH; Minoru TAKAHASHI; Yoshio YOSHIZAWA; et al.: Journal of Power and Energy Systems Vol. 5 No. 1 Special (2011), pp.33-44.

Google Scholar

[2] Bao F.; Wang X.; Tao Z.; Wang Q.; and Du S.: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol. 126 No. 6 (2009), pp.3106-3113.

Google Scholar

[3] Cheolsoo Park; Hanshin Seol; Kwangsoo Kim; and Woojae Seong: Ocean Engineering Vol. 36 No. 9-10 (2009), pp.754-762.

Google Scholar

[4] Wojs, K, Gudra, T, and Redzicki, R: Ultrasonics Vol. 44 NO. 4 (2006), pp.350-359.

Google Scholar

[5] Tuziuti T, Yasui K, Sivakumar M, Iida Y and Miyoshi N: The Journal of Physical Chemistry A Vol. 109 No. 21 (2005), pp.4869-4872.

DOI: 10.1021/jp0503516

Google Scholar

[6] Tomaz Rus, Matevz Dular, Brane Sirok, Marko Hocevar and Igor Kern: Journal of Fluids Engineering Vol. 129 No. 9 (2007), pp.1112-1122.

Google Scholar

[7] Jan Černetič: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol. 123 No. 5 (2008), pp.3316-3321.

Google Scholar

[8] Qi Dingman, Lu Chuanjing, and He Yousheng: Shanghai Journal of Mechanics Vol. 20 No. 1 (1999), pp.1-9.

Google Scholar

[9] ZHANG Feng-hua, TANG Chuan-lin, YANG Lin and LIAO Zhen-fang: Mechanical Science and Technology Vol. 23 No. 8 (2004), pp.979-981.

Google Scholar

[10] Zhang Fenghua, Liao Zhenfang, and Tang Chuanlin: Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics Vol. 18 No. 3 (2001), pp.14-19.

Google Scholar

[11] Yang S., Zhang X., and Zhao C.: Acta Physica Sinica Vol. 49 No. 4 (2000), p.636~640.

Google Scholar