Nonlinear Analysis of Transmission Tower Structure by Three FEM Models

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, three kinds of FEM models, i.e., the truss element model, the beam element model and the mixed beam-solid element model are utilized to simulate the full-scale field test of transmission tower. Based on Abaqus software, the geometric and material nonlinearity of the structure is considered. Comparing the numerical results with test data, it is found that the truss element model is no longer suitable and the mixed beam-solid element model is more accurate than the beam element model. Thus, using solid element to discrete the key nodes of the tower can greatly enhance the accuracy and reliability of the numerical prediction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

914-917

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Barsoum. R. S, Gallagher. R. H. in: Finite element analysis of torsional flexural stability problems [J]. Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1970, 2: 335-352.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620020304

Google Scholar

[2] Bathe. K. J, Bolourchi. S. in: Large displacement analysis of three-dimensional beam structures [J]. Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1979, 14: 961-986.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620140703

Google Scholar

[3] Bazant. Z. P, El-Nimeiri. M. E. in: Large deflection spatial buckling of thin-walled beams and frames [J]. Engineering Mechanics Division, 1973, 99(6): 1259-1281.

DOI: 10.1061/jmcea3.0001837

Google Scholar

[4] Chan. S. L, Kitipornchai. S. in: Geometric nonlinear analysis of asymmetric thin-walled beam-columns [J]. Engineering Structures, 1987, 9(4): 243-254.

DOI: 10.1016/0141-0296(87)90023-x

Google Scholar

[5] S. Roy, Shu-Jin Fang and A. M. ASCE et al. in: Secondary stresses on transmission tower structures [J]. Energy Engineering, 1984, 110(2): 157-172.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9402(1984)110:2(157)

Google Scholar

[6] N. Prasad Rao, V. Kalyanaraman. in: Non-linear behaviour of lattice panel of angle towers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research [J]. Constructional Steel Research, 2001, 57: 1337-1357.

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(01)00054-2

Google Scholar

[7] Jaka Dujc, Boštjan Brank and Adnan Ibrahimbegovic. in: Multi-scale computational model for failure analysis of metal frames that includes softening and local buckling [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. Methods, 2010, 133: 1371-1385.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.09.003

Google Scholar

[8] G. M. S. Knight, A. R. Santhakumar. in: Joint effects on behavior of transmission towers [J]. Structural Engineering, 1993, 119(3): 698-712.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1993)119:3(698)

Google Scholar

[9] Phill-Seung Lee, Ghyslaine McClure. in: Elastoplastic large deformation analysis of a lattice steel tower structure and comparison with full-scale tests [J]. Constructional Steel Research, 2007, 63: 709-717.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.041

Google Scholar

[10] N. Ungkurapinan, S.R. De S. Chandrakeerthy and R.K.N.D. Rajapakse et al. in: Joint slip in steel electric transmission towers [J]. Engineering Structures, 2003, 25: 779-788.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(03)00003-8

Google Scholar