Collision Simulation Analysis for Space Flexible Probe-Cone Docking Mechanism

Abstract:

The nature of buffer system is a very important factor of determining the dynamic properties for the success of docking operation in space. The current buffer system is too large and highly complicated, which is not suitable for microspacecraft for On Orbit Servicing (OOS). In this paper, a new type of probe-cone docking mechanism with flexible docking cone as buffer system was presented, and the impact force was simulated using the explicit finite element code, LS-DYNA. Then, the time history of the impact process such as the velocity of docking probe and the docking cone’s displacement was computed under the given impact velocity and initial deviation. In the end, the influence of the wall thickness of docking cone on the impact force was analyzed. The conclusion that the flexible docking cone can greatly help to reduce the maximum impact force by more than 50% provides a basis for the engineering design of the buffer system.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 138-139)
• Pages: 111-116
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.138-139.111
• Online since: November 2011
• Authors: Wei Han, Yi Yong Huang, Xiang Zhang, Xiao Qian Chen
• Keywords: Buffer System, Docking Simulation, Impact, LS-DYNA

References

[1] Saleh J H, Lamassoure E, Hastings D E. Space systems flexibility provided by on-orbit servicing: part 2 [J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2002, 39(4): 561-570.

DOI: 10.2514/2.3845

[2] Motaghedi P, Stamm S. 6 DOF testing of the orbital express capture system [C]/The International Society for Optical Engineering. Proceedings of the SPIE-Modeling, Simulation, and Verification of Space-based System II, Orlando, FL, USA, March 30-31, 2005: 66-81.

DOI: 10.1117/12.606222

[3] Kawano I, Mokuno M, Kasai T, et al. Result of autonomous rendezvous and docking experiment of enineering test satellite-VII [J]. AIAA Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2001, 38(1): 105-111.

DOI: 10.2514/2.3661

[4] Underwood C, Richaedson G, Savignol J. In-orbit results from the SNAP-1 nano-satellite and its future potential [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 2003, 361: 199-203.

DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1123

[5] A. Aryaei, K. Hashemnia, K. Jafarpur. Experimental and numerical study of ball size effect on restitution coefficient in low velocity impacts [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2010, 37: 1037-1044.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.04.005

[6] Zukas, Jonas A. Introduction to Penetration Mechanics. High Velocity Impact Dynamics. Ed. Jonas A. Zukas. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1990, pp.65-126.

[7] Chin-Cheng Huang, Tung-Yueh Wu. A study on dynamic impact of vertical concrete cask tip-over using explicit finite element analysis procedures [J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2009, 36: 213-221.

DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2008.11.014

[8] Zhang X, Vu-Quoc L. Modeling the dependence of the coefficient of restitution on the impact velocity in elasto-plastic collisions [J]. Int J Impact Eng 2002, 27: 317-341.

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(01)00052-5

[9] Teng, T.L., Chu, Y.A., Chang, F.A., Chin, H.S., Lee, M.C. The dynamic analysis of nuclear waste cask under impact loading [J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2003, 30: 1473-1485.

DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4549(03)00080-x

[10] Lee, Y.S., Ryu, C.H., Kim, H.S., Choi, Y.J. A study on the free drop impact of a cask using commercial FEA codes [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2005, 235: 2219-2226.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.03.009

[11] Y. Duan, M. Keefe, T.A. Bogetti, B. Powers. Finite element modeling of transverse impact on a ballistic fabric [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2006, 48: 33-43.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.09.007