Data Exchange Method between ADAMS, CATIA and Solid Works Software

Article Preview

Abstract:

Three kinds of data transmission standards of IGES, parasolid and STEP on the SolidWorks and ADAMS software were contrasted to get the Parasolid for the most suitable software standards. CATIA 3D software has powerful function of modeling, but ADAMS has poor function of modeling. It has built the four feet completion institutions of 3D modeling by CATIA, then through among the middle media of SolidWorks software format to conversion and import CATIA 3D entity modeling into ADAMS/View environment to make up for the problem of insufficient ADAMS modeling ability. This paper focused on the discussion of data exchange process among ADAMS, CATIA and SolidWorks software.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

422-427

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yu Feipeng, Jia Hongshe: Data Exchange of Between ADAMS And CAD Software UG And SolidWords[J]. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, pp.37-39, 2005, (10).

Google Scholar

[2] Gu Cheng-zhong,Wu Xin-yue: Skill of 3D data exchange[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture,pp.62-64, 2007, (5).

Google Scholar

[3] Li Hong: Skill of 3D model data format exchange [J]. Journal of Jinhua College of Profession And Technology, pp.15-17, 2008, 8(6).

Google Scholar

[4] Zhang Yi, Li Changhua: Research on Realization of IGES Postprocessors[J]. Modern Electronics Technique, pp.119-121, 130, 2009, 32(5).

Google Scholar

[5] Geng T, Porr B, Worgotter F: Fast biped walking with a sensor-driven neuronal controller and real-time online learning [J]. The International Journal of Robotics Research,pp.243-259, 2006,25(3).

DOI: 10.1177/0278364906063822

Google Scholar

[6] P. S. Pa: Design of a modular assembly of four-footed robots with multiple functions[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, pp.97-105, 2009, 25(4/5).

DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2008.12.001

Google Scholar